Fascism American Style; The Takeover of The U.S.


USA Today
Miami Herald
Boston Globe
Washington Post
Washington Monthly
The New York Times
The Los Angeles Times
The Guardian Unlimited
The Baltimore Chronicle
Seattle Post Intelligencer
The Washington Independent
U.S. News
The Nation
Mother Jones
The New Yorker
The Rolling Stone
The New York Observer
Intel Daily
The Exiled
Scoop News
Media Roots
The Raw Story
Al Jazeera News
Democracy Now
Global Research
Blacklisted News
The Daily Censored
Information Clearinghouse
David Corn
David Sirota
Joe Conason
Eric Alterman

Helen Thomas
Paul Krugman
Maureen Dowd
Thom Hartmann
Glenn Greenwald
Arianna Huffington
George Will
Peggy Noonan
Michael Barone
Christopher Hitchens
Charles Krauthammer
Online Journal
Counter Punch
The Consortium
Common Dreams
The News Dissector
The Daily Howler
Crooks & Liars
The Brad Blog
Boiling Frogs
Daily Kos
The Hill
Roll Call
American Politics Journal
Mark Fiore
The Daily Show
The Colbert Report

Saturday Night Live
Michael Moore
Media Matters For America
Media Channel
PBS News
BBC News
CNN News
ABC News
CBS News
NBC News

Countdown with Keith Olbermann
The Rachel Maddow Show

Air America
Oracle Broadcasting
NewsFocus Radio Online
Brave New Films
Snowshoe Films
James Burke Productions
John Pilger
Greg Palast

Daniel Hopsicker
Project Censored
Center for Public Integrity

Pilots for 9/11 Truth
World For 9/11 Truth
Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Lawyers For 9/11 Truth
Firefighters For 9/11 Truth
Political Leaders For 9/11 Truth
Scholars for 911 Truth & Justice
Religious Leaders For 9/11 Truth
Medical Professionals For 9/11 Truth
Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth
This op/ed is an as yet unfinished observation regarding the real power that runs not only the U.S., but most of the world as well. Chapters as yet unfinished are set in blue-text, with bullet points or loose notes as to the direction of the forthcoming information. This message isn't for Democrats and Republicans, it is submitted for all Americans that truly value our United States Constitution and our forefather's intent of a Republic specifically governed "of the people, by the people, and for the people." This article is a wake up call to all Americans, asking for unity and one purpose, preserve our nation and protect and defend our Constitution.


The founding fathers laid the foundation for a free republic.

The Hidden Coup On America

Many Americans think they have it all, the best country, a free republic, and the finest form of government the world has ever known. While that very well may have been true at one time, sadly enough it is no longer, and hasn’t been the case for quite some time. Many would take issue with that assessment, but unfortunately they would be naively mistaken because they have never been properly educated on American history, nor have they ever personally looked into the reality of the hidden history of the United States and the long winding fascist coup of the 20th century that stole the dream of our forefathers. 

Some would say, Impossible! How could such a thing happen without millions of Americans being none the wiser?  

The truth is that we are a very young country and as a result are quite ingenuous and most gullible when it comes to trusting not only our government, but also our overly esteemed media, the latter whose job it is to safeguard our republic by keeping us informed of the truth.  

What the unsuspecting populace needs to understand is a very basic concept; the only way to usurp a republic is to fool the people. The only way to fool the people is to take their news and entertainment media. The way to steal their media is to simply buy it

That is exactly what has happened in this country, and as a result, a fascist coup has been perpetrated by an elite few, without most being none the wiser.

Unsuspecting to many, we have been fooled and kept in the dark for decades now by nefarious forces of greed, primarily through a highly controlled corporate media. The media alliance is absolutely imperative to a successful coup, and is also invaluable to the powers that be in hiding criminal misdeeds and political secrets from the public. The media ownership by the powers that be is more valuable than any standing army, for you can subdue an opponent without a fight, through the indoctrination of propaganda and disinformation. When the masses are unsuspecting and still fully trusting of their media, the effects of this type of attack are perhaps far more potent than a physical attack, because those influenced will gullibly accept the misinformation voluntarily on their own, never knowing any better.

Certainly one person who understood this concept quite well was Sir Winston Churchill who once said, "History is written by the victors."  

That simple statement is the essential key to understanding how a large population can be deceived en masse. Our publishing houses, along with our bought and paid for corporately owned American media, have been and still are, owned by those who wish to keep us in the dark on matters of truth, relating to their behind the scenes corporate endeavors for monopoly, as well as their pernicious political forays for influence and power. Whenever the wealthy seek to profit unfairly at the public’s expense, it is most always done in a clandestine manner. 

But please don’t take this author’s word for it, turn off the television and look into the facts of our American history on your own. No one ever said freedom was supposed to be easy. You have to fight to keep it.  

A woman once asked Benjamin Franklin after the Philadelphia constitutional convention, “Sir, what type of government have you given us?” Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it,”  for he knew all too well of the money powers that would prey upon a government of the people, by the people and for the people.

Notice that Franklin never said a "democracy." He said we were given a "republic," for the forefathers knew that it was under a republic that all people would be free. Nowhere in our Constitution does it say the word "democracy." A simple word search of the document will show that it is just not in there.

We have been brainwashed to believe that democracy is the right of the people, but democracy is essentially mob rule, the greater portion of the population rules the rest.

The Constitution is not about what's best for left or right, for liberals or conservations, or for that matter, the majority. It's about what's best for all Americans.

Unfortunately, "mob rule" has become the essence of our very political system, the majority, 51% get to make the laws for the minority, the other 49%. That was not at all the dream of our forefathers, for they wanted to protect even 1% from the other 99%. So long as you were a decent moral, law abiding citizen, you had the inalienable right to live your life the way you wanted to, not according to the majority rules concept.

Definition: re-pub-lic, a government in which supreme power resides in its citizens. A form of government in which the people hold supreme control over the government, and in which the head of government is not a monarch. The word "republic" is derived from the Latin phrase res publica, which can be translated as "a public affair".

Definition: de-moc-ra-cy, government by the people; especially, rule of the majority.

Again, "democracy" was not the form of government that our forefathers wanted for us. They organized a "republic." We have been brainwashed to think a democracy is best, when it truly is contrary to the vision of a republic, freedom for everyone.

Due diligence is continually necessary to preserve the dream of a fair republic, which was envisioned and meticulously planned and laid out by our forefathers.

We have been led astray and most haven't even the slightest inkling whatsoever. We have been purposefully divided and politically enslaved into a system of left versus right, liberals and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans. It's an "us against them" mentality that keeps us divided, a Hatfields and McCoys mindset that our neighbor is our enemy. Nothing could be further from the truth, but it's in someone's best interest to keep us this way.

Remember the old saying... "United we stand, divided we fall." -John Dickinson

I am making an earnest personal plea to all of you, not as Democrats or Republicans, but as Americans, to please look on your own and seek the real truth, while you still have a chance to find it.

Who Has The Capability For Absolute Control? 

One thought to consider is that the most successful coups don’t come from the outside, but from within, where people least expect them, and that is why most are blind to the takeover that has taken place in this country, because well financed traitors from within have deceived us and surreptitiously stolen our Constitutional freedoms from an unsuspecting populace.

The first thing to understand is, who has the power to manipulate government, to entice our politicians, to steal our media and fool an entire nation, without most of the general populace ever catching on?

For any plan to exist for well over 100 years, you have to ask yourself how it could ever stay together and perpetuate beyond a century. While we may be tied to only two major political parties in the U.S., faces and names do change. The organizational body does not remain fully intact as it changes through elected terms. Even religious organizations initiate some change over the course of time. Ideals may shift amongst these various control groups, somewhat, as decades go by, so what possible faction could not only maintain a steadfast ideology, but also a consistent membership over the long haul? The only two groupings that could possibly hold the most consistency would have to be occult secret societies and ultra-wealthy elite bloodlines.

While this author is not a fan of occult organizations, they do indeed exist, but they too need a consistent membership to maintain their order. The one segment of society that appears most obvious is the ultra-rich oligarchs and aristocracies of the world. We're not talking about simply those who are well off enough to be above the middle class, but the absolute filthy rich, those who have stolen or inherited vast fortunes, for whom money is indeed no object. On the international scene it could be families of nobility, such as kings, queens and assorted monarchs, but for a country as young as the United States it would have to be the 1% of Americans who control the majority of wealth in this country… the absolutely filthy rich, the Rockefellers, the Morgans, the Waltons, the Koch brothers, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, etc. It is enormous wealth of these proportions that is able to usurp our political system, especially when a cabal of many is present. It is massive wealth in the hands of a few that allows control of the rest. It’s as simple as that.

The elite ultra-wealthy that own it all, the 1,011 billionaires of the world, are the ones to keep a watchful eye on. The U.S. has 403 of those billionaires, a disproportionate figure when compared to the rest of the world. Despite having only 5.2 percent of the world’s population, the U.S. has 41 percent of the world’s millionaires. That is an inordinate percentage of total international wealth to come from one country.

The top 400 in American wealth are all billionaires. From William Ford Sr. (Ford Motor Company) with $1-billion, to Bill Gates (Microsoft) with $54-billion, the richest 400 are but only 0.00013029037979808572 percent of the U.S. population. This isn't even close to the 1% figure that is said to own it all, yet these 400 individuals are without a doubt the wealthiest of all.

These wealthy elite are clearly a diminutive figure in comparison to the 307-million plus Americans who inhabit the U.S., but they clearly own an overwhelming vast majority of the nation's wealth.

The danger that exists is, what happens if two or more of these members of outlandish wealth should ever ally together in a criminal cause? The disposable income that they can afford to lose on a cause or for an agenda is an imposing and dangerous figure, one which is offset and made possible due to the tremendous money stream of continual income that they receive. They can throw millions into a project, knowing full well that they literally have many millions more coming right back in, without ever jeopardizing their overall total wealth.

It is with this premise in mind, the power of great wealth, that this article takes a look at an enduring ideology for total world domination, as well as a look at the families of great wealth who not only have the riches to fulfill such an endeavor, but also the perpetual seed to carry such a plan forward.

Some might claim this to be a fruitless venture of paranoid delusion, but they would be remiss in recognizing that such a threat from the wealthy has already presented itself and has been documented at least twice in the last one hundred years, both times with significant adverse consequences for the poor and middle class of the U.S. If this is all new to you, don't feel bad. Those that control this world have worked very hard so that you don't know the real truth, but if you'd like to know more about the hidden history of the United States in the 20th century, please read on.

Beware The Banker

Bankers have always been at the seat of all endeavors of state. The bankers have the greatest influence of all, because of their access to big money and their ability to fund agendas and political policies, but without a moral center they are the absolute worst of all influences.

"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws."
-Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812) Founder of the House of Rothschild.

Sentiment such as this seems to have prevailed over the ages and is what causes many to not trust the big bankers. In those days, bankers were not widely trusted by a great many. Consider the following quotes:

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power (of money) should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs." -Thomas Jefferson.

"History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and it's issuance." -James Madison

Consider this quote from another historical leader…

"When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain." -Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France.

Wise words indeed when it comes to those of great wealth.

Bankers are not the only figures of immense wealth, but they do indeed control the fortunes of nations. Precious metal and jewel magnates, railroad and shipping barons, not to mention industrialists capitalizing on technology or valuable raw materials, such as steel, they too are all significant forces of wealth to be reckoned with.

Money has deviously been employed as the new slave master, which, combined with an unchecked system of capitalism, has become a powerful tool within an empowering web of greed that enriches an elite few, while oppressing the greater majority.

It is the greater forces of immense wealth, and their applied effects and influence on society, that this article will attempt to examine.

As the old saying goes, "Money is power and power is control."

With that age old adage in mind, we begin this journey with another more contemporary quote in mind, the infamous wisdom of Watergate mole "Deep Throat" who was reported to have told Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward, "follow the money."

The Monetary Struggle For America

It has often been said that man is a slave to money. Nothing could literally be more true. The money system has for years been a rigged game which only benefits those who control it. Money is used to enslave those who have little of it. It has become a form of slavery that few recognize, but most become entrapped in.

Money is the possibility or the right to exploit the labours of others. Money is a new form of slavery, which differs form the old only in being impersonal, and in freeing people from all the human relations of the slave. –Leo Tolstoy

Of the many reasons that our forefathers left England for, religious freedom, or to escape the oppression and tyranny of the monarchy, perhaps none stood out more prominently than its unfair interest bearing system of banking.

In the new American colonies, the Virginia colonists were given their own self government. They devised their own system of currency, free from the taxing money system of the crown, but after time, the long arm of oppression from the British government eventually reached out back across the Atlantic and imposed their monetary rule once again.

The Currency Act of 1751 was the start of the British crackdown on the colonial money system, with the final Currency Act of 1764 actually forbidding the colonies from issuing their own paper money. This forced the colonists to once again borrow money from the central bank of England, with interest, which soon created debt for the colonists. The very same swindle they had escaped from was now being levied on them once again, only this time in the new colonies of America. The colonists were once again slaves to the monetary system of the monarchy.

This long struggle between Britain and the American colonies over the right to issue their own paper money was a significant factor in bringing about the American Revolution.

"The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George the III and the international bankers was the prime reason for the Revolutionary War." -Benjamin Franklin

With the aforementioned in mind, we flash forward to the 1860s.

A Civil War, Or An Orchestrated Attack?

Before you can understand this takeover, we need to start at the beginning, the genesis of the coup, in the late 19th century.

We’ve all been taught that one of the main reasons for the civil war was over the issue of slavery, among other reasons, but consider for a moment the possibility of another cause, that of foreign intervention. Many have postulated over outside influences, to foment a divide among the states, to conquer under a weakened state. Some have theorized that the English crown wanted its colony back and had a hand in dividing our nation, so as to conquer it through financial means, rather than outright war.

There have been rumors throughout history that the civil war was brought about by the wealthy bankers of Europe in an attempt to divide the nation and then conquer it through its banking system. Their intent was a new central banking system which would have total monetary control over the U.S.

Before the birth of the Federal Reserve, we had a national bank, created in 1791 with the support of Alexander Hamilton. It lasted until 1811 when it officially lapsed. Banks were given limited charters at that time, because like corporations, our forefathers knew the immense power that could grow out of them to threaten the state.

The second national bank came into being in 1816 under President James Madison, supposedly to help offset the financial pains of the nation after the war of 1812.

Andrew Jackson opposed the creation of a national bank for ideological reasons. Jackson said it was unconstitutional and gave an excessive amount of power to one single entity. He claimed that it wielded too much control over the Congress, but most of all, it threatened the government through usurpation by private foreign entities, the wealthy elite of Europe.

"If Congress has the right to issue paper money, it was given to them to be used by themselves... and not to be delegated to individuals or corporations"
-President Andrew Jackson, Vetoed Bank Bill of 1836 

Jackson argued that a national bank only increased the fortunes of an elite wealthy inner circle, at the expense of the common man, farmers and laborers. In 1832, Jackson won his banking battle, successfully vetoing an attempt to re-charter the bank, and withdrawing the government’s money one year later.

Jackson had killed the National Bank. The European House of Rothschild was greatly upset that they had lost their fierce battle with Jackson over their lucrative Central Bank.

A few years later, in 1835, an assassination attempt was made on Jackson, alleged by many as the result of the banking issue, but Jackson survived the attack, due luckily enough when both of the assassin’s pistols misfired. This was the first ever attempted assassination of a U.S. President. It unfortunately would not be the last.

The Rothschilds did not give up though and persisted in their quest for financial control of the U.S. Please consider the following comments, written by the Rothschilds in a letter to New York banking interests, proposing a new “system” to the wealthy elite of our country, just two years before Lincoln’s assassination.

"The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests." -The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

The “system” that the Rothschilds were referring to was a new proposed monetary control scheme, capable of toppling government through the takeover of its banking and currency. The “system,” as it was described, would eventually become known as the Federal Reserve System.

It would appear that the issues we have been taught about regarding the origins of the civil war may not be as we were led to believe. Slavery was merely a guise for motives far more sinister in the division of the union.

Abraham Lincoln is quoted as saying at the time, "combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary machinery of peacetime government have assumed control of various southern states."

The Coup Begins

Assassinated U.S. Presidents, Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield and William McKinley.

If ever there was a significant moment in history where our country was the most vulnerable, it was clearly during the civil war era and the reconstruction period. We were a divided nation in conflict. The animosity from this domestic war certainly didn’t end abruptly overnight with the final  surrender document at Appomattox. Even to this very day, we still have residual sentiment left over in the South, so it is not hard to understand that we were not functioning at our political best as a unified government during that time. To coin an old phrase, we were most likely ripe for the picking.

During this reconstruction period, a dramatic challenge took place as we had three sitting United States Presidents murdered. Three!

All were assassinated within a very short 36 year period. This is a disturbing historical fact which is quite alarming, yet seldom dealt with in American history books.  

  • 1865 - Assassination of President Lincoln
  • 1881 - Assassination of President Garfield
  • 1901 - Assassination of President McKinley

Suspiciously enough, all of those presidential murders coincidentally occurred within a very narrow window of history that was ideal with opportunity for disaster capitalism. The reconstruction period was indeed a period as tumultuous as the war itself.

Three U.S. presidents killed in just 36 years. That is an incredibly short time span to have the most highly guarded leader in the U.S. murdered, three times!

Was it all just a wild coincidence, or was it a calculated criminal collusion for control of the United States?

How did the Secret Service fail on three separate occasions to protect three different presidents?

A single person, one lone gunmen, is able to penetrate Secret Service protection and successfully pull off the assassination each time.


One thing is without doubt, all of this took place during the weakest possible moment in our nation’s history, while we were healing from a civil war, yet very much still politically divided. It was the perfect chance for a coup.

Many would openly agree that three assassinated presidents in a span of just 36 years, a period of only nine possible presidential terms, is quite alarming and certainly very questionable, considering the extreme security.

If you were to witness firsthand the assassination of not one, not two, but three American president’s in your lifetime, specifically in a very short 36 year period, you would have to ask yourself, what behind the scenes struggle was taking place at that time in our nation’s history? 

For those old enough to realize the time frame, this period would be the same duration as 1974 until 2010, and yet we still grieve for one president killed beyond that, over 40 years ago in 1963. (No disrespect intended to JFK.)

So what are the odds that three presidents would fall in such a short amount of time?

This is a startling fact, not explored well enough in American history books and our classrooms, perhaps because of the powerful goliath that grew out of this great turmoil. We don't study this period as much as we probably should because those who stole the power don't want us to look. They control everything, including the major publishing houses that print our history books. Again, we defer to the wisdom of Churchill, that history is indeed written by the victors. If the unscrupulous ultra-rich own the publishing houses, where is the untainted reference for future generations to understand an accurate record of history?

As with every major political assassination, we’ve been taught to believe it was all merely the work of one lone assailant, someone mentally unstable, or full of political hate. It’s a discomforting thought to think that one single person was capable of easily circumventing presidential security in order to murder the President of the United States on three separate occasions!

Is it possible that all three of these presidential assassinations were not the work of a single person, nor separate isolated occurrences all to themselves? Is it possible that something far more sinister might have been at work? Given the short time span involved, it certainly seems plausible, if not perfectly reasonable, that perhaps there was a cabal in place, a well funded aggressive political adversary instigating an internal struggle with the U.S. government.

One Possible Motive: Opposition To Bank Control

President Lincoln had angered the powerful banking institutions when he said,

"The money power preys upon the nation in times of peace and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in the hands of a few and the Republic is destroyed ... I feel at the moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war." -Abraham Lincoln

Lincoln was greatly upset by the banks’ extremely high interest rates (24% to 36%), in return for funding of the civil war. This would have plunged the nation into extreme debt, if not a national bankruptcy. Lincoln refused and passed the Legal Tender Act of 1862, issuing the first "green backs," a new national currency that was interest free.

Lincoln had proclaimed, "The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest."

The bankers were angered by this and also Lincoln’s new greenbacks, and for it Lincoln paid a horrible price.

The London Times wrote about Lincoln's new greenbacks: "If that mischievous financial policy which had its origin in the North America Republic during the late war in that country, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off its debts and be without debt. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government (the Lincoln administration) must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

After his assassination Congress passed the Contraction Act on April 12, 1866 which called for the retiring of Lincoln's green backs from circulation.

President James A. Garfield was also said to understand the danger presented by the wealthy bankers. Two quotes are attributed to Garfield:

"Whoever controls the money of a nation, controls that nation."

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."

Garfield was alleged to have made a statement to the effect that the bankers can create a depression whenever they want.

Garfield was also assassinated, in 1881, during his first year in office.

President  William McKinley also had his run in with the banks. In 1893, he faced a personal crisis that almost sidetracked his political career. He had co-signed bank notes totaling more than $100,000.00 to help a friend start a business. The business failed and McKinley was expected to repay the bank loans. McKinley did not have the money. His friends, raised enough funds to repay the loans and a sympathetic public re-elected him as governor in 1893.

In 1896 the banks came under attack from William Jennings Bryan, so the rich bankers supported McKinley who was elected president. He was then re-elected in 1900 on a gold standard platform. McKinley was known as a “hard money” man, because he was in favor of a gold standard backing our currency, instead of the fiat money that pays handsome fortunes to the banking elite. McKinley was against “easy money”  that had no backing, lent by bankers at a sizable interest to the borrower. This type of currency was to become the eventual backbone of the soon to be Federal Reserve system.

McKinley's stance on the gold standard was obviously an adversarial position to the new "system" proposed by the European Rothschild bankers. This very likely caused a problem for the Rothschild's plans.

In light of the positions of Lincoln, Garfield and McKinley over U.S. currency, it does indeed seem altogether plausible that elite men of wealth may have conspired to remove these officials from office. Once you recognize what soon followed these political exterminations, the possibility of an orchestrated coup becomes all the more possible, if not inevitable.

It should be noted that when McKinley ran for President, Republican powers were adamant that he choose wealthy New York socialite and banking friend Teddy Roosevelt as his running mate. This would play a key role later for creation of the Fed, once Roosevelt assumed office for the murdered McKinley.

In 1907, with the bankers annoyed at Congress and their refusal to institute a new central bank, the bankers took matters into their own hands, with JP Morgan Sr., at the forefront of the cause. Morgan was said to have started a rumor that the Trust Company of America was about to go under. This created a panic and an ensuing run on the banks, triggering a huge financial crisis, but with banking friend Roosevelt taking over for the murdered McKinley, the fix was in.

Roosevelt signed into law the National Monetary Commission, a ruse to calm a panic stricken public. Senator Nelson Aldrich would become the head of this new agency and the machinations for the greatest financial coup ever were suddenly in place.

A 'Fowl' Endeavor

(L-R) Jekyll Island, off the coast of Georgia, as well as the Jekyll Island Hunt Club.

Just nine years after the third presidential assassination, a group of six very powerful and wealthy men met on November 22nd, 1910, in a then secret meeting off the coast of Georgia, on Jekyll Island, owned by a group of multi-millionaires, led by JP Morgan Sr., all of whom were said to comprise 1/6th of the world’s total wealth at that time. The meeting was clandestinely arranged under the guise of a duck hunting trip, but these wealthy elite were in actuality planning the takeover of this nation's banking and monetary system; in essence, a coup on the United States of America.

These magnates of wealth represented a vast majority of the world's mega-rich, such as the Rockefellers, the Morgans, the Warburgs and the Rothschilds, with a heavy attendance from JP Morgan interests. They were invited to the meeting by Senator Nelson Aldrich, the head of the National Monetary Commission, with all of them refusing to use their last names in the hopes of not being found out or implicated in their treasonous takeover plan.

For this meeting, all of the servants were said to be given two weeks off and removed from the island, with new replacement servants brought in, so as to lessen the chances of recognition over its secret wealthy guests. Afterwards, when word leaked out, none of the wealthy attendees would admit to being there, until the Federal Reserve was finally enacted a few years later.

As a result of this secret meeting in 1910, the Federal Reserve System was born and instituted just a few years later in 1913, the same year that JP Morgan Sr. would die.

It was on Woodrow Wilson’s watch that the Federal Reserve coup was perpetrated against our country, but before it could happen, Wilson had to be coerced.

President Taft, like Jackson and others before him, was against establishing a central bank, vowing to veto any such move, so the banking elite, led by Bernard Baruch, approached Wilson and assured him of their support in the upcoming election, but only if he would support their plans for the Federal Reserve System, as well as a new income tax. They would also help staff Wilson's cabinet, filling it with supporters of their plan. Wilson agreed to go along with the plan and was elected president.

The plot becomes very interesting through the appointment of one of Wilson's new advisors, Colonel Edward M. House, an operative of the wealthy elite who was put in place to steer their plan through the Wilson administration and Congress. House was at the very least antithetical to U.S. government, as it was envisioned and set forth by our forefathers. At the worst, House could arguably be considered a treasonous individual, due to his radical belief that the Constitution was a product of 18th century thinking and was no longer viable, requiring a drastic change from a government of the people.

House was already the infamous author of a heretical futuristic novel titled, "Philip Dru: Administrator, A Story of Tomorrow, 1920-1935." The story details a coup against the U.S. government and a rewriting of the Constitution, favoring a central bank, a graduated income tax, and a new world order under a 'League of Nations." House was without question a dubious administration appointment, one with adverse political ideology to the nation, with indisputable contrarian Constitutional views.

In hindsight, a case could arguably be made that House's novel was a premeditated blueprint for restructuring the nation. His actions and those of the Wilson administration appeared to follow the novel so closely that at the end of WW I, Wilson's fourteen points included the formation of an "association of nations." Just as in House's book, the League of Nations was born, however it failed to lead to a world government because the U.S. refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles.

At the end of his term, President Wilson held such great remorse over the decision to allow the Federal Reserve into being, that upon leaving office, he sadly admitted his gullibility in allowing the cabal to take control over our nation’s monetary system.

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the world--no longer a government of free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men." -President Woodrow Wilson

Think about having the power to control a nation's currency. Seriously. How much power would you have at your fingertips? Think about the concept of that kind of power, not in the hands or control of government, but in the hands of private bankers. That is exactly what we have under the Federal Reserve Act.

This is probably one of the best kept secrets in the United States, that the Federal Reserve is not owned by the US Federal Government and there is no reserve. Again, it is a private institution, a cartel of ultra-wealthy owners of the banking community.

When those of great financial wealth hold that much control over our monetary system, a power far greater than that of nations is created. Our country is a slave to their interests as long as we remain part of the Federal Reserve “system.”

It is interesting to note that in 1926 the United States Congress banned the use of the words "Reserve", "United States" and "Federal" in any bank names. Only those institutions with the words already in use, such as The Federal Reserve, were allowed a grandfather clause to keep them in their titles.

When money speaks, the truth keeps silent. -Russian Proverb

A "Federal Reserve Note," worthless paper with a value assigned, despite no gold or silver backing.
The Federal Reserve Seal with its Masonic all-seeing eye and pyramid.

A Historical Side Note: It should be mentioned that while the secret planning for the Federal Reserve was taking place, another calculated takeover was drawing discussion as well, the break-up of Rockefeller's Standard Oil through the Sherman Antitrust Act. The irony is that both the US government and Standard Oil each tried to undermine the other, but apparently the power of overwhelming wealth and political influence eventually won out for Rockefeller in the end.

The First Billionaire & First Monopoly: Rockefeller & Standard Oil

Before we can go forward, we have to take a step back in order to allow a complete picture of the complexity with the US government and Rockefeller's Standard Oil. The dynamic between the two entities made for a combustible relationship which came to a head in 1910 and 1911. The first year showed Rockefeller in a treasonous scheme with other multi-millionaires for control of the U.S. currency system. The latter year notes the U.S. ruling to break up the Standard Oil Trust.

Founded in 1870 as a corporation from Ohio, Standard Oil was the first true corporate juggernaut at the time and wielded tremendous influence and power, controlling 88% of the refined oil produced early on in America. As the largest oil refiner in the world, the company took a lion's share of the market in oil production, transportation, and refining.

Standard Oil and it interests is a Rockefeller company. Not only did the Rockefellers  give birth to America's first multinational corporation, but also America's first billionaire as well.

William Avery Rockefeller was said to be a "snake-oil" salesman, however his family would prosper far beyond him. It was John Davidson Rockefeller Sr. (1839-1937) who was America's first billionaire, but it was his son, John D. Rockefeller Jr. (1874-1960) who defined the family empire. The junior Rockefeller would eventually sire a daughter, Abby, as well as five sons, John D the III, Nelson, Laurance, Winthrop, and David. It is David Rockefeller (1915) who has carried the family legacy forward. He will leave it in the hands of his namesake, David Rockefeller Jr.

Standard Oil is alive through Exxon-Mobil and Chevron.

In 1892 the state of Ohio went after Standard Oil in court and won, forcing the break-up of the trust. It wasn't much of a drastic restructuring though. Standard merely spun off Standard Oil of Ohio, but they kept control.

Due to a loosening of the New Jersey incorporation laws Standard Oil Trust was reborn in 1899 at 26 Broadway in New York as a holding company, Standard Oil Company of New Jersey (SOCNJ). The company held stock in 41 companies, which in turn held stock in many other companies, and so on. The public was said to openly grow suspicious and worried about accountability to the government.

The Federal Commissioner of Corporations ruled unequivocally that Standard's dominant position in the oil refining industry was due "to unfair practices, to abuse of the control of pipe-lines, to railroad discriminations, and to unfair methods of competition."

In 1904 Standard Oil controlled 91% of US production.

In 1909 the Department of Justice sued Standard Oil under federal law through the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. It was the government's position that Standard had developed a monopoly and was influencing interstate commerce. The company was forced to break into 34 smaller companies in 1911.

In 1911 Standard's share of US refining had diminished to 64%. This was hundreds of millions in lost revenue versus the turn of the century, however, Rockefeller became far wealthier after the break up due to the rise in stock prices afterwards.

When he was informed of the US Supreme Court's decision to breakup of Standard Oil, Mr. Rockefeller turned to his golfing partner and said, "Father Lennon, have you some money?" And the priest was very startled by the question and said, "No." And then he asked, "Why?" And Rockefeller replied, "Buy Standard Oil."

The government's 1911 decision to bust up the Trust had the direct affect and end result of making the individual company pieces more valuable than the single corporate entity. As a direct result stock prices rose tremendously. Rockefeller ended up a far wealthier man as a result. Some might say that anyone who can engineer their own destruction by gaining billions more in profit is either most fortunate and a very lucky person indeed, or perhaps is the most cunning of all.

Potentially the most significant American company ever set forth, beaten back by government intervention. Chairman John D. Rockefeller was no doubt outraged at the ruling, but was forced to submit to the break-up.

Two of these companies were Jersey Standard (Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Socony (Standard Oil Company of New York). Within thirty years, both companies grew significantly. One of the original spin-off companies, Jersey Standard, would re-acquire the world title as the largest single oil producer in the world. (It also acquired a 50% share in Humble Oil & Refining Co., a Texas oil producer.) The company eventually changed its name to Exxon.

Socony purchased a 45 percent interest in Magnolia Petroleum Co., a major refiner, marketer and pipeline transporter. (In 1931, Socony merged with Vacuum Oil Co., an industry pioneer dating back to 1866, and a growing Standard Oil spin-off in its own right.) The company was changed to Mobil.

On November 30th, 1999, Exxon and Mobil were allowed to reunite under legal merger, becoming Exxon-Mobil, arguably, once again, the top oil company in the world.

Tracking The Standard Oil Breakup:

  • Exxon and Mobil merge to reunite.
  • Standard Oil of Indiana, became Amoco
  • Standard Oil of Ohio (SOHIO) ...now owned, along with Amoco, by BP.
  • Standard Oil of California became the Chevron Corporation

Of the 34 "Baby Standards", only 11 were given rights to the Standard Oil name, based on the state they were in. Conoco and Atlantic elected to use their respective names instead of the Standard name, and their rights would be claimed by other companies.

Currently, three super-major companies own the rights to the Standard brand name in the United States: Exxon-Mobil, Chevron Corporation, and BP.

BP acquired it's US rights through acquiring Standard Oil of Ohio and Amoco, and has a small handful of stations in the Midwestern United States using the Standard name.

Chevron has one station in each state it owns the rights to branded as Standard except in Kentucky, which it withdrew from in July 2010.

Exxon-Mobil keeps the initial Standard corporate entity still alive. While Exxon-Mobil has full international rights to the Standard name, it continues to use the Esso name overseas.

The Standard Oil of yesterday is essentially alive and well today through its progeny, Chevron and Exxon-Mobile, with both companies once again dominating the industry as their parent company did for so long.

Attack / Counterattack

It would seem apparent that the U.S. government went after Rockefeller first, filing against him as much as perhaps a year before his alleged duck hunting trip to Jekyll Island. It would appear that Rockefeller fought back quite hard as a result, resorting to a treasonous coup.

Much like Europe and the Rothschilds, the U.S. did not see the danger coming until it was too late, such an enormous private wealth to contend with, holding far too much power and influence.

Could part of Rockefeller's motive for the Federal Reserve coup be based on revenge for the government going after his Standard Oil?

The U.S. government was successful in breaking up Standard Oil company, although allowing Rockefeller to get even richer in the process while his stocks were splitting.

The coup from the Money Trust though would be even grander yet, allowing them total control over printing of the nation's currency.

It would appear that Rockefeller came out ahead on all fronts.

Repercussions From The Fed

The Federal Reserve is not Federal and there is no reserve.

The Federal Reserve has had a devastating and disastrous effect on not only the United States, but also the world.

World Wars I and II were both made possible through the financial aid from the Fed, including all wars since.

The Agricultural Depression of 1920 is attributed to Federal Reserve policies, as well as the 1929 Black Friday Wall Street Crash and the resulting Great Depression.

Before the great financial crash, Paul Warburg was said to issue an insider tip to those of the wealthy elite so that they could pull out of the market in time, without losing their vast wealth. This in turn put them in the advantageous position to buy out companies for mere pennies on the dollar, increasing their fortunes and industrial power. (This was written about by Gary Allen and Larry Abraham in "None Dare Call it Conspiracy,") It is interesting to note that this is the exact same scenario that just recently occurred with the orchestrated financial collapse of 2008.

Another repercussion of the Fed was the dissolution of the gold standard, instigating the transference of the people’s wealth into worthless paper assets.

Under this system, our money is no longer backed by anything other than faith. It is literally a rich man’s shell game. There is no longer gold or silver backing every dollar. Our money is now called “legal tender.” It is a manufactured currency.

The obvious biggest pitfall of this unscrupulous financial system is an ever growing debt, due to the extortion-type system of interest due to those who print the money.

The other disadvantage, once the U.S. left the gold system, was runaway inflation.

These two damaging drawbacks would bankrupt and eventually enslave the nation.

Opposition Against The Federal Reserve

Many notable American Congressman and political leaders had much to say about the Federal Reserve System and have given dire warnings immediately upon its inception. They knew of the dangers presented by this powerful cartel.

"This [Federal Reserve] act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth... When the President signs this act the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized..."

"I have seen these forces exerted during the different stages of this bill" and "The money power overawes the legislative and executive forces of the Nation and of the States." -Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., December 22, 1913, [Congressional Record dated vol. 51]

"From now on, depressions will be scientifically created." -Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. , 1913

"The [Federal Reserve Act] as it stands seems to me to open the way to a vast inflation of the currency... I do not like to think that any law can be passed that will make it possible to submerge the gold standard in a flood of irredeemable paper currency."
-Henry Cabot Lodge Sr., 1913

"The Money Trust ... caused the 1907 panic, and thereby forced Congress to create a National Monetary Commission." -Congressman Charles Lindberg, [Congressional Record, December 22, 1913, vol. 51]

"The financial system has been turned over to the Federal Reserve Board. That Board administers the finance system by authority of a purely profiteering group. The system is Private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people's money." -Charles A. Lindbergh Sr., 1923

"We have, in this country, one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board. This evil institution has impoverished the people of the United States and has practically bankrupted our government. It has done this through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it." -Congressman Louis T. McFadden in 1932 (Rep. Pa)

"The Federal Reserve banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this nation is run by the International bankers.” -Congressman Louis T. McFadden

"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are the United States government's institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign swindlers" -Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the Committee on Banking and Currency, June 10, 1932 [ Congressional Record 12595-12603. ]

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back again. However, take it away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits". -Sir Josiah Stamp, (President of the Bank of England in the 1920's, the second richest man in Britain)

"It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
-Henry Ford   

"To expose a 15-Trillion dollar rip-off of the American people by the stockholders of the 1000 largest corporations over the last 100 years will be a tall order of business."
-Buckminster Fuller

"In my lectures throughout this nation, and in my appearances on many radio and television programs, I have sounded the toxin that the Federal Reserve System is not Federal; it has no reserves; and it is not a system at all, but rather, a criminal syndicate." –Eustace Mullins

"Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States." -Sen. Barry Goldwater (Rep. AZ)

For those that have a hard time fathoming the absolute power of the Fed over our government, please consider this arrogant response from Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan when asked by PBS news anchor Jim Lehrer about what should be the proper relationship between the Fed Chairman and the President of the United States.

“Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means basically that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. So long as that is in place and there is no evidence that the administration or the Congress or anybody else is requesting that we do things other than what we think is the appropriate thing, then, what the relationships are don’t frankly matter.” –Alan Greenspan, Federal Reserve Chairman

The opposition to the Federal Reserve is also well noted by former President John F. Kennedy who is said to have wanted to break away from the Federal Reserve system. On June 4th, 1963, President Kennedy signed into law presidential Executive Order number 11110, which amended Executive order 10289 of September 19th, 1951. Executive Order 11110 was said to give the treasury the power to create and issue currency, without having to go through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. The Treasury Department was given the new authority to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars within the Treasury. Kennedy was assassinated only five months later.

Kennedy’s sentiment regarding the Federal Reserve still echoes to this very day. Brave Congressmen such as Dennis Kucinich (D) and Ron Paul (R), both from opposite sides of the political spectrum, are very much opposed to the Federal Reserve System scam on the American people.

After the economic collapse of 2008, an American groundswell began, asking for an audit of the Federal Reserve for the first time ever in its history. The movement continued to grow and still has much solid support to back it, however, the distraction of the Gulf oil spill gave the media the perfect excuse to drop the story altogether, getting the public to become apathetic to the cause, or lose interest altogether.

The Fascist Coup of 1934

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the bonus army and General Smedley D. Butler.

The Council on Foreign Relations became very prominent in government and politics during the FDR administration, holding the following positions: Secretary of State, Assistant Secretary of State, Secretary of War, and maybe most importantly, Treasury Secretary.

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."
-President Franklin D. Roosevelt [letter dated November 21, 1933]

Another of Colonel Edward M. House's plot lines from his novel was about to come into play.

After their resounding success with the formation of the Federal Reserve System, the wealthy elite were reported to take their treason to a whole new level, with a heinous crime more egregious than their first. Just as before, select ultra-rich American families conspired together to instigate yet another coup against the United States government, but this time it was to be a total overthrow, an armed revolution against a sitting president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Many of the rich were said to be furious over the New Deal and the notion that the lower classes might be lifted up from the servitude that the upper class had forced Americans into. They were unhappy with what they perceived as the socialist reform of the U.S. and a redistribution of its wealth. (Sound familiar with the current economic collapse?)

While Roosevelt's new deal may not have been liked by many of the wealthy, it was a boon for the elite bankers who were able to able to loan money at a profitable interest. It was a win-win for the banking families, such as the JP Morgan banks, run now by JP Morgan Jr. Those who orchestrated the crash could now profit heavily from it.

Roosevelt was not exactly popular with all Americans. His presidency is a bit more convoluted than most realize. Again, the victors are writing, or re-writing, the history. Roosevelt's family was reported to be heavily invested in New York banking since the 1800s. Roosevelt also certainly had influence from his uncle Frederic Delano, who was the first vice-chairman of the Federal Reserve. He was also a noted Wall Street executive and was said to sit on the board of directors for eleven corporations. So Roosevelt was no rube when it came to the Federal Reserve and its cartel of wealthy elite owners.

In fact, despite the New Deal, Roosevelt helped to put a final nail in the coffin of this country's national sovereignty by listening to the Fed cartel and taking the U.S. off the gold standard, opening the door to national debt and runaway inflation.

Many of the insiders from the money elite moved from the Wilson administration and were heavily involved in the FDR administration, such as Bernard Baruch and the infamous Colonel Edward M. House.

It was through the Baruch proposed National Recovery Administration in 1930 that many of the key money insiders were allowed the power to regulate the economy. Baruch protégé Hugh Johnson was appointed to oversee the NRA. Johnson was assisted by CFR member Gerard Swope and together they had the power to regulate wages, prices, and working conditions. Herbert Herbert Hoover viewed these endeavors as nothing more than pure fascism. According to Hoover, it was nothing more than the reconstruction of Benito Mussolini's model for a corporate state. Fortunately the U.S. Supreme Court later handed down a ruling that the National Recovery Administration was unconstitutional.

Nevertheless, despite his ties to big money, FDR had his biggest detractors there.

In an October 31st, 1936 speech, FDR acknowledged this divide:

For nearly four years you have had an Administration which instead of twirling its thumbs has rolled up its sleeves. We will keep our sleeves rolled up.

We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace—business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.

They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.

Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me—and I welcome their hatred.

I should like to have it said of my first Administration that in it the forces of selfishness and of lust for power met their match. I should like to have it said of my second Administration that in it these forces met their master.

The American people know from a four-year record that today there is only one entrance to the White House—by the front door. Since March 4, 1933, there has been only one pass-key to the White House. I have carried that key in my pocket. It is there tonight. So long as I am President, it will remain in my pocket.

Those who used to have pass-keys are not happy. Some of them are desperate.
--Franklin Delano Roosevelt

A cabal of the rich elite formed together to conspire against FDR and our government. Among those implicated in the treasonous coup were the DuPont, Remington and Bush families, executives of Goodyear Tire, General Motors, US Steel, and once again, the JP Morgan empire. Since the prominent wealthy elite were in on the coup, one can only surmise that FDR had angered them in some fashion, possibly going along with part of their plan, but not the whole plan.

An emissary was set up as a go-between, to buffer the wealthy from the physical machinations of the plot. Gerald C. MacGuire, a bond salesman for a prominent Wall Street broker, Grayson MP Murphy, was selected as the puppet to implement the daily execution of the plan.

The orchestration of the plot was to use the “bonus army,” a 500,000 man militia of disgruntled WWI veterans who had marched on Washington DC over grievances with the payment of bonuses due to them from the war. All that was needed was to find a charismatic military leader to martial them together against FDR and force him from the White House. The coup leaders originally wanted General Douglas MacArthur, but he was already used to help bust up the encampments of the bonus army, driving them from Washington by force. So the group settled on retired General Smedley D. Butler, who had originally visited the bonus army encampment, showing support for their efforts. The plotters thought he would be a good choice because he was well liked and very popular with the soldiers, but also because he had become an outspoken critic of government and its use of the military, claiming that his service was nothing more than a racketeer to protect corporate overseas financial interests.

What the wealthy plotters underestimated was the devout patriotism of Butler, a self professed Republican, but one who would eventually stand against their coup in defense of the Democrat Roosevelt.

In 1933, Butler was approached by Gerald C. MacGuire and William Doyle, in an attempt to get him to run for the post of American Legion Commander, an initial step towards commandeering a veterans army to move against Roosevelt. After meeting with the two men, Butler declined the invitation.

Butler was later approached many times afterwards by MacGuire, who claimed to represent the Committee for a Sound Dollar. MacGuire tried to entice Butler into the coup during several meetings with him, flashing enormous sums of money while telling of powerful financial backers. MacGuire tried to coerce Butler into appearing before the American Legion convention that year, to read a speech that was written for him by John W Davis, a senior attorney for JP Morgan & company. Butler was enraged, but kept his sentiments to himself, instead playing along with MacGuire in order to learn more about those behind the plot. After several meetings, Butler demanded to meet one of the principal backers.

Wealthy millionaire and Singer sewing machine heir Robert Sterling Clark, an ex-army vet who served under Butler during the boxer rebellion in China, was sent to visit the retired general, to try and persuade him to join in the plot. Clark told Butler that he would gladly spend half of his fortune to save the other half. He wanted Butler to address the American Legion convention in regards to Roosevelt policies, however, Butler refused.

In further conversations with MacGuire, Butler was said to have told MacGuire, “If you get these 500,000 soldiers advocating anything smelling of fascism, I am going to get 500,000 more and lick the hell out of you, and we will have a real war right at home."

MacGuire told Butler that soon a new group would be forming, one that would confront Roosevelt while supporting Butler. The American Liberty League soon came into being, the wealthiest lobbying group this country had ever known. It was comprised of extremely wealthy conservative members, as well as some very prominent wealthy Democrats, with major funding from the DuPont family. Herbert Hoover refused to join the new group, saying that their Wall Street model of liberty was not for him. The group included John J. Raskob a member of the DuPont Board of Directors Executive Committee and also the former chairman of the Democratic party, Al Smith, former NY Governor and 1928 presidential candidate, John W. Davis, presidential candidate in 1924, Grayson Murphy, Robert S. Clark, Irenee Dupont, and EF Hutton, to name but just a few.

Arms for the movement would come from the Remington arms company, of which DuPont had a controlling interest. The Remingtons were also said to be intimately involved in the plot as well.

Butler was eventually able to coerce MacGuire into talking to a former serviceman under his command during the war, newspaper journalist Paul Comly French, under the ruse that French would write supportive articles for the coup, to influence the American public. MacGuire opened up even more to French, thinking that he would disseminate propaganda that would aid the coup. He advocated a fascist government and said they might consider keeping FDR as a figurehead, much the same way Mussolini did with the king of Italy. He said funding would come from the JP Morgan banking empire,

French eventually broke the story in the Philadelphia Record newspaper and the New York Post. The New York Times also picked up the story, but interestingly enough the JP Morgan influenced paper tried to dissuade the public from believing Butler and French, calling the entire plot, nothing more than a hoax.

A special Congressional commission was created to investigate the coup, the 1934 McCormack-Dickstein committee, led by John W. McCormack of Massachusetts and Samuel Dickstein of New York. Dickstein had feared that the far right might come to power in the U.S.

The American Liberty League tried to discredit Butler, but the Congressional committee believed Butler, saying that they were able to verify all pertinent statements made by him.

MacGuire denied studying European fascist veterans organizations to the committee, but early letters to Clark implicated him, actually referencing a coup d’ etat.

The Special Committee on Un-American Activities indeed found much evidence of a coup, but mysteriously failed to call one single member of the elite families that were fingered in the testimony from Butler and French. The committee gave a weak excuse of hearsay and refused to bring the wealthy backers before the commission.

Many wealthy Republican families were said to be intimately involved and were willing financial backers, yet the McCormack-Dickstein committee allowed them all to go scot-free. Some have speculated that FDR also allowed the guilty to go unprosecuted in order to utilize a new found political leverage to push through his reforms in the New Deal. Some have even speculated that the guilty were allowed to go free because the committee thought that such a revelation might be too damaging and unsettling for the country, or because most Americans would find such a domestic cabal of the country's elite and wealthy simply too unbelievable to fathom.

Butler claimed that the committee had expunged the official record, omitting the wealthy elite who were fingered in the investigation. He later went on WCAU radio in Philadelphia and broadcast the following comments. "Like most committees it has slaughtered the little and allowed the big to escape. The big shots weren't even called to testify. They were all mentioned in the testimony. Why was all mention of these names suppressed from the testimony?"

MacCormack said he didn’t know why nothing ever came of the investigation. As for Dickstein, he said that he thought it was up to DOJ.

Whatever the reasons, it is an undeniable fact and a historical matter of Congressional record that the McCormack-Dickstein committee did indeed find solid evidence of an organized fascist coup to overthrow FDR and the U.S. government.

Once the plot was revealed, the Liberty League officially disbanded in 1936, after only two years of operation, with it perpetrators pulling back into the shadows to await another opportunity to advance the cause of fascism for the extreme far right in the U.S.

Conveniently enough for the guilty plotters, MacGuire died of alleged natural causes, at the young age of only 37, coincidentally just one month after the final report was sent to Congress.

In a 1937 campaign speech, FDR excoriated those involved, saying, “With the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties thirsting for power (they) reached out for control of our government itself.”

Butler later ended up opposing FDR over the U.S. entry into WWII, saying that American soldiers should no longer fight abroad, but instead remain home to defend only against a domestic attack.

Butler died shortly thereafter of pancreatic cancer, on June 21st, 1940.

You are free to openly wonder in amazement as to why all of this didn't make our school text books, but keep in mind the famous Churchill quote, "the victor always writes the history." When you realize that these ultra-rich Americans owned our publishing houses and newspapers, you can perhaps understand how this story has been stricken from the history books.

Some have suggested that had the plot succeeded, perhaps the U.S. would have aligned with the fascist regimes of Hitler and Mussolini instead of the allies, providing possibly an entirely different outcome for WWII.


An Integral Coup Component: Takeover Of The U.S. Media

The most common argument that arises from those in disbelief as to how such a coup could go unnoticed by the American people is, “Well why hasn’t the media said anything about it?”

To be quite fair, some lesser known media outlets and publications have reported on it, over and over, ad nauseam, however, it is the larger media outlets that have drowned out the truth with their fervent denials, or through their outright refusal to even address the issue at all. To understand why or how something like this could happen, you must have an in-depth knowledge of the American media and its hierarchy.

First and foremost, the media is an extremely invaluable tool used to beguile an unsuspecting and naïve, if not blindly ignorant populace. To repeat what was already mentioned in the opening of this article, the most important premise to understand is that the only way to usurp a free society is to fool the people. The only way to fool the people is to steal their media. The way to steal their media is quite simply to buy it. This is exactly what has happened.

Some in the media have been more than willing to admit their complicity.

“There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.” John Swinton, former Chief of Staff, The New York Times. 

How did the watchdog of our Constitutional freedoms arrive at this sorry state?

The first portion of the plot began in 1917 with the direction from, of all estates, the JP Morgan empire. Once again Morgan interests were at the forefront of another plot when he hired twelve of the top news managers to help him determine the most influential newspapers in America. The idea was to find the key news institutions that other news outlets looked to and were thus influenced by. (This is documented by Congressman Oscar Calloway in the official U.S. Record, volume 54, dated February 9, 1917.)

Once the editors arrived at a consensus, Morgan then bought or infiltrated the top 25 news organizations reported to him by his task force of news managers. An editor was assigned to run each paper, making sure that all news stories were controlled and that the watchdog for freedom was officially castrated.

This was a key step towards total information and news control in the United States, giving birth to censorship, disinformation and propaganda. The guardian of our forefather's dream of Constitutional freedom has been deeply wounded.

As Thomas Jefferson once said, “The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.”

Operation Mockingbird

Years later the CIA would take that media control a step farther by recruiting naive, self proclaimed patriotic reporters to aid in their efforts, as well as installing their own people within the nation's mainstream corporate press. This project was known as "Operation Mockingbird," the name alone was suggestive of the mission's objective, total control of the U.S. media system. Many might naively scoff at such an idea, until perhaps they hear it straight from the horse's mouth.

According to former CIA Director William Colby, "The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media."

If that quote alone isn’t enough to raise a “Spock eyebrow” for some, then please consider this gem from another former CIA Director, William Casey, “We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

There are two surefire methods of recruitment for Operation Mockingbird. One method is through blind patriotism, recruiting those willing to report whatever they are told because it is said to be a National Security matter, or in the best interests of the United States. Others they just bribe, for the ultimate mole, someone who is willing to print absolutely anything, true or not, for the simple price of money.

Many broadcast dignitaries were lured to the cause of Operation Mockingbird, including such venerable icons as Walter Lippmann, Edward R. Murrow, Walter Cronkite, to name but just a few out of hundreds of broadcasters and noted journalists.

In the case of Lippmann, he was considered by some to be the Dean of American Journalism. He was also the editor of a US propaganda unit, and the Secretary of "The Inquiry," a quasi-intelligence agency. He knew both sides of the cover.

The CIA took media manipulation to new heights of disinformation and propaganda, while pushing journalistic integrity to new lows. One thing the CIA understands well is that information is as good as gold, and he who controls information can use that data for political gain, power and wealth. With that premise in mind, the CIA began a project in the late 1940s known as “Operation Mockingbird.” The program was originally under the direction of Frank Wisner, an undercover State Department official who was assigned to the Foreign Service to propagate disinformation in Europe through his Office of Policy Coordination.

It was Wisner who took under his wing a former graduate of the Army Intelligence School, Philip Graham, who was the publisher of the Washington Post. Along with Allen Dulles and Richard Helms, they undertook the genesis of “Operation Mockingbird,” a covert project to infiltrate the American press for the efforts of disinformation and propaganda on domestic soil. They were able to coerce many media members under the guise of “national interests” and patriotic efforts during the early stages of the cold war. Hundreds of reporters, editors and publishers were said to be involved and overseen by then CIA Director Dulles.

FOIA documents were eventually uncovered that showed CIA agents openly bragging through interoffice memos that the agency had in place "important assets" within every major news organization in the U.S. In 1982, the CIA finally admitted to employing reporters on their payroll.

A great many of our hallowed media outlets are alleged to be involved with Project Mockingbird. They are rumored to include, ABC, CBS, and NBC. Other publications said to be involved are Time magazine, Newsweek, Fortune magazine, Business Week, the New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, New York Post, Denver Post, Minneapolis StarTribune, Gannett/USA Today, Knight-Ridder newspapers, the Associated Press, United Press International (UPI), Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, and Copley News Service, not to mention over 400 journalists who have been used for numerous assignments, all according to released FOIA documents.

Many publishing institutions are also rumored to be involved, such as Simon & Schuster, McGraw-Hill, Random House, Doubleday, Harper Bros., Viking Press, and also Book of the Month Club.

Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein was reportedly once told, "One journalist is worth twenty agents." 

The CIA policy is to use and manipulate these “assets” in order to plant disinformation in the U.S., the same way they have done for years overseas through their Office of Strategic Influence. The problem is, it is apparently sanctioned by Congress for them to do so abroad, but expressly illegal to do so domestically.

All of the above once again echoes back to the infamous quote from Churchill on the victor writing the history. It’s easy to see how this could come to fruition when the publishing houses have the power to refuse or accept what actually gets published.

The project did not stop there, but eventually infiltrated Corporate America, as well as many major U.S. universities. The chokehold on America was complete.

The American media furthers the agenda of Operation Mockingbird by simply avoiding stories altogether that are meant to be kept from the public, or else mixes some truth with blatant misinformation to purposefully muddy the facts.

Many books have been written on the subject of Operation Mockingbird:

  • The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence
  • Who Controls the Media?  The Subversion of the Free Press by the CIA, The Depraved Spies and Moguls of the CIA's Operation Mockingbird 
  • The CIA: America's Premier International Terrorist Organization
  • Virtual Government: CIA Mind Control Operations in America

For those that don't believe the CIA would recruit news reporters and media elites, check their new recent recruitment of Wall Street executives. The following excerpt is from a July 12, 2009 article in The Times of London:

CIA hires Wall Street talent
The Sunday Times – July 12, 2009

THE CIA is taking advantage of the financial meltdown to recruit a new generation of financially literate spies with a series of job ads targeting Wall Street workers.

Economics has always been an area of interest for the CIA, and former senior agent David Gordon said financial knowledge had come to the fore during the global crisis. Since February, the CIA has been producing a daily economic intelligence briefing for President Obama in addition to his regular intelligence reports.

“Economics, finance and business professionals — if the quest for the bottom line is just not enough for you, the Central Intelligence Agency has a mission like no other,” one radio advertisement says. “Join CIA’s directorate of intelligence and be a part of our global mission as an economic or financial analyst. Make a difference in your career and for your nation.”

The article can be found at the following link: CIA hires Wall Street talent

As you can see, the ad is not only a personal egocentric tug, but also a patriotic enticement, designed to play on the weakest human character traits. This is exactly how the agency recruits media personnel, by playing on national service and making the recruit feel as if they’re a special part of a grander moral endeavor. The patriotic allure of national pride, as well as the ego serving conjured glamour of being a spy are powerful tools to attract both the weak and the arrogant. Many myopically join for the personal thrill, but also the perceived noble call to duty.

The agency has reached far beyond its organizational boundaries through kidnappings, drug running, terrorist activities, assassinations and government toppling. It has essentially become the antithesis of what is portrayed in its charter. For many, the CIA has indeed become the greatest evil of this world, arrogantly flaunting its power while exercising no moral restraint in achieving its own self prescribed goals. Operation Mockingbird is arguably their most powerful tool as it is the veil that shrouds their heinous misdeeds and covers their abuses.

Make no mistake about it, Operation Mockingbird is indeed alive and still operating as our media continues to mislead the public on everything and anything that those pulling the strings wish their puppets to sell to us. Whether it be the numerous unreported incongruities of 9/11, the illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the orchestrated economic collapse, or the diversion of the gulf oil spill, the media has not told us anything close to the truth. But as the X-Files was famous for pointing out, “The truth is out there.” All we need to do is look.

More On Operation Mockingbird:
Operation Mockingbird: CIA Media Manipulation
Mockingbird - The Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA
Two Dead Presidents And Operation Mockingbird
Walter Cronkite: Most Trusted Asset of Operation Mockingbird
Operation Mockingbird

More On CIA Recruitment of Economists: 
World Economy Becomes Focus For CIA Recruiting
CIA Training, Recruiting Initiatives Highlight Intelligence

Alphabet Intelligence

It's truly sad when you realize that some of the worst organizations on the face of the earth are the intelligence operations that were set up specifically to protect us and our country. The U.S. alphabet agencies are among the most notorious and nefarious of all. The term alphabet agencies refers to those government acronyms of U.S. intelligence, such as the OSS, NSA, FBI, NGIA and most infamous of all, the CIA, to name but just a few.

The CIA sprang forth from the OSS, the Office of Strategic Services, an organization whose formation was promoted by Prescott Bush, with assistance from the notorious Dulles brothers, attorneys for the Rockefeller empire, not to mention direct cousins of the family. Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg once stated that, "The Dulles brothers were traitors."  Some have speculated that Allen Dulles became the head of the CIA in order to cover up the treasonous activities of himself and his clients. 

The CIA has been under CFR control almost continuously since its creation, starting with Allen Dulles, one of the founding members of the CFR, along with brother John Foster Dulles, relatives to JP Morgan.

The CIA is not an organization of truly evil people. Let's make that clear from the start. Like the other aforementioned intelligence units, and our own government, there are hundreds upon hundreds of solid character individuals with the best of intentions and moral fortitude, all with a genuine desire to serve their country with every respect for the law and human rights for all.

There are obviously some people who differ with this assessment, thinking the utter worst of these outfits, our government, and those in their employ, but this author would disagree with this viewpoint wholeheartedly. To believe that every single employee of our government, or operative of these intel organizations, is corrupt, is simply not possible, given the immense volume of people involved, however, like any large organization there are always a few bad apples that fall from the tree. It is these individuals who have given such organizations the poor image and reputation that they have been labeled with by a great many.

With that said, it is indeed a select rogue few who have caused much damage to our government and these intelligence agencies, marring history with illegal political assassinations, government coup d'etats, and untold numbers of brutal civilian murders, all in the name of alleged U.S. national interests, more perverse than they are patriotic.

One horrid example is the CIA's 1953 overthrow of the democratically elected leader of Iran, Mohammad Mossadegh. He took his country's oil back from British Petroleum and Standard Oil, (Rockefellers) nationalizing his country's oil industry. So we murdered the guy and put our puppet in place, the infamous Shah of Iran. This was "Operation Ajax." The Shah was a a brutal dictator, put in place by the U.S., with Britain's blessing. The Shah governed the Iranian people with an iron fist, brutalizing his own people who would resist him. This of course eventually led to the Iran hostage crisis. A vicious circle indeed.

Most every tin-pot dictator in this world has come from the CIA, from Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, to Noriega, Batista, Cordova, Diem, Franco, Marcos, Botha, Saddam Hussein, etc, etc, etc. Add Harmid Karzai to that list now in Afghanistan as well. The wide reach of U.S. alphabet intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA, has brought about much harm in this world, all in the name of "national interests," which, according to General Smedley D. Butler, generally reflected corporate interests, or big money from the wealthy elite.

More often than not, as indicated by Butler, these indiscretions of power have been for corporate espionage or support of the ruling wealthy elite. This abuse of power has indeed created a most regrettable and unshakable tainted global image for the CIA as the most evil organization the world has ever known.

Originally developed as a necessary international "intelligence gathering" operation, the CIA has become infamous for clandestine activity reaching far beyond the scope of its original charter. We can only hope that those from within who are not involved in the nefarious side of this organization are taking note and giving a helpful hand, whenever and wherever possible, to counter their rogue brethren. We sorely need their help badly.

Many politicians, even Presidents, have talked openly of the Central Intelligence Agency and their disdain for its noted criminal operations throughout the world.

"I never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence Agency back in '47, if I had known it would become the American Gestapo." -Harry S Truman (1961)

After the failed Bay of Pigs assault on Cuba, CIA head Allen Dulles was said to be infuriated with Kennedy's refusal to go along with the plan. Likewise, Kennedy was said to have remarked that he wished to "break the CIA into a million pieces and cast it into the wind."

Much has been rumored about possible CIA involvement in Kennedy's assassination, with none other than George Bush Sr. being briefed on the hit. Bush denies that it was indeed him that was briefed, instead pointing to another agent coincidentally having the exact same name within the organization.

To this day we still have many dire warnings remarking on the evils of the CIA. Take this recent comment from Republican Congressman Ron Paul...

"There's been a coup, have you heard? It's the CIA coup. The CIA runs everything, they run the military. They're the ones who are over there lobbing missiles and bombs on countries. ... And of course the CIA is every bit as secretive as the Federal Reserve. ... And yet think of the harm they have done since they were established [after] World War II. They are a government unto themselves. They're in businesses, in drug businesses, they take out dictators ... We need to take out the CIA." -Congressman Ron Paul

Again, not everyone within our alphabet intelligence agencies are bad people, however it is clear that there are those who have taken advantage and criminal license of the power of their affiliation, for purposes far beyond the organizations original stated charter.

Not only do we have the alphabet agencies, we have the Secret Service to think about as well. Created by Abraham Lincoln in 1865, they would be a force to consider since it is under their watch that we have lost four sitting presidents to assassination, plus a presidential contender in RFK. Their record is certainly less than impeccable.

Of all the aforementioned, the hands down least trusted has to be the CIA. Again, there are many good people working for the agency and we desperately need their help, but it is an unscrupulous faction of bad agents that have sullied their reputation in many ways.

Operation Mockingbird, mass population mind control, drug running, and the toppling of international governments seems to be a prominent agenda of this rogue faction from within. As you will soon read, buying into broadcast ownership also became a high priority for some.

A Brief History of Broadcasting In America

Soon it wasn't enough to just own the voices of the media. To obtain total control, the entire media had to be purchased and consolidated. The biggest fish of all at the time was television, the darling of everyday American life. Before the advent of cable and then satellite programming, television was dominated by three major networks, NBC, CBS and ABC. All three television networks originally began as radio networks.

NBC began operations in 1926, owned by RCA and shareholder Westinghouse, along with General Electric. The new company eventually moved to Rockefeller Center in 1933, along with RCA owned RKO Pictures, in a deal arranged by new landlord John D. Rockefeller Jr.

At the time, NBC dominated the airwaves with its "Blue" and "Red" networks, but the newly created Federal Communications Commission of 1934 ruled later in 1939 that NBC held a monopoly over the airwaves and forced NBC to break up its blue and red networks. The blue network was sold and became ABC.

RCA and NBC were the first to broadcast via television at the 1939-1940 World's Fair in New York. Much to the annoyance of the wealthy elite who had previously tried to overthrow his administration, Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the first U.S. president to appear on television while at the fair on April 30, 1939. The first home television sets were actually offered in 1938 so that viewers could be ready in time for the World's Fair broadcast.

RCA and NBC scored another coup as they were able to convince the FCC to approve its color system as the new standard for color TV, beating out rivals CBS and DuMont in December of 1953.

General Electric (GE), a major defense contractor, acquired full ownership of NBC in 1986, but decided in 1987 to sell off its radio properties to Westwood One.

In 2009, Comcast agreed to purchase NBC from General Electric.

CBS was originally Chicago based "United Independent Broadcasters" network, formed on January 21st, 1927 and owned in part by the Columbia Phonographic Manufacturing Company, owners of Columbia Records.

UIB didn't even make it through the year, with Columbia selling the network on September 25, for $500,000 to William S. Paley, a hard right-wing heir of a Philadelphia cigar manufacturer. Paley changed the corporate name to CBS, the "Columbia Broadcasting System". Paley was alleged to be part of Project Mockingbird.

In the early 1940s CBS created "Network of the Americas" and "Voice of America." CBS eventually made its venture into television in 1950.

CBS was sold in 1995 to Westinghouse Electric, another major defense contractor, for $5.4 billion dollars, but in 1999 a subsidiary company, Viacom, announced it was taking over CBS for $37 billion. With the takeover, Viacom became the second-largest media company in the world. Viacom just happens to be owned by Summer Redstone, a strong force within the conservative far-right and a veteran with a WWII intelligence background and alleged ties to the OSS and later the CIA.

Surprisingly enough though, in 2005 Viacom split in two, with CBS becoming the CBS Corporation, while Viacom went with Paramount Pictures.

The only thing that didn't change was that both companies were still owned by Summer Redstone and his company, National Amusements.

This is another network with alleged CIA affiliation. In a move that shocked the media industry ABC was bought in 1985 by CapCities, a company four times smaller than the network Goliath, and one rumored to be a CIA front organization. CapCities had the help of multi-billionaire Warren Buffet in the surprise purchase.

CapCities originally was Hudson Valley Broadcasting, which began after WWII in 1947. It has been reported that in 1954 William Casey, along with veteran broadcaster Lowell Thomas bought HVB. Thomas was said to be a close friend and business partner of CIA Director Allen Dulles. One other partner was Thomas Dewey, another alleged CIA member. William Casey would of course go on to become CIA Director under Ronald Reagan.

Needless to say, the reported CIA connections to this network powerhouse should be of concern to anyone who values freedom of the press and accuracy in news reporting.

Of all the media subversion and manipulation over the years, none might arguably be more threatening than the FOX Network, owned by Australian multi-billionaire media mogul Rupert Murdoch, the owner and CEO of NewsCorp. Previous FCC rules restricted foreign ownership of U.S. media for the simple reason of political indoctrination. The idea was to protect the public airwaves from foreign propaganda and disinformation that might unsettle American values and our ideology of a free republic.

FOX somewhat snuck in the back door to American broadcasting in many ways. In March of 1985 Murdoch's News Corp paid $250-million dollars for a 50% share of 20th Century Fox movie studio. Two months later News Corp coughed up $1.55-billion dollars for independent TV stations in six major markets. Later that year, in October, 20th Century Fox announced that it would enter the network business with a challenge to the big three, ABC, CBS, and NBC. Murdoch paid $325-million dollars to purchase the remaining shares of 20th Century Fox studios.

That same year Fox was accused of not informing the FCC about the extent of its foreign ownership, but somehow was allowed to continue on with its plan for a 4th U.S. television network.

Murdoch and NewsCorp also drew extreme opposition in 2003 to its merger and takeover of DirecTV, but once again The FOX company was able to sidestep the complaints while under a favorable Bush administration and the Michael Powell (R) led FCC.

FOX was able to succeed where others failed, skirting FCC regulations by programming just barely under the required number of hours to be considered a network. FOX broadcasts just two hours of prime time weeknight programming compared to three hours for ABC, CBS and NBC. This allowed Murdoch and FOX to tip-toe around the network requirements of the FCC.

One of the more controversial moves was naming Roger Ailes, former Republican media strategist for Nixon, Reagan and George HW Bush, as the president of the FOX News Channel and chairman of the FOX Television Stations. The biggest criticism of FOX News is that, even though its motto is undeservedly "Fair and Balanced," the news department is anything but, leaning decisively to not just the conservative right, but the extreme far right.

Not only has FOX been routinely criticized for its political news bias, it has continually drawn the ire of the PTC (Parents Television Council), being named for the "Worst TV Show of the Week" more than any other network.

In addition to his NewsCorp, FOX and DirecTV holdings, Murdoch has a vast worldwide media empire that includes satellite TV, cable, newspaper, magazine and internet holdings that make him a media baron to be feared and reconciled with. Murdoch also owns Dow Jones as well as managing the assets of Hughes Electronics.

This Ted Turner news organization was founded in 1980, quickly growing to become a global giant in the news industry and is seen in over 212 countries with a daily audience estimated at 1-billion people worldwide. Turner lost control of CNN after a takeover from Time-Warner in 1996. Turner has since admitted that he regretted allowing the merger with then AOL-Time-Warner.

To Kill A Mockingbird

Over the years, it became increasingly apparent to many observers of the CIA's effort to control the media through Operation Mockingbird. The biggest blow to the project came in 1974 when two ex-CIA agents, John D. Marks and Victor Marchetti published a book entitled "The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence" (ISBN 0440203368). The book opened the door for many questions following the expose on Project Mockingbird. Public scrutiny of the CIA hit a new high and struck a responsive cord among many Americans, including quite a few on Capitol Hill.

Concerned over the possible infiltration of the CIA into the U.S. media, the Senate began an investigation under the Church Committee, the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.

The Church Committee in 1975 revealed even more on Operation Mockingbird. The final 1976 report stated, "The CIA currently maintains a network of several hundred foreign individuals around the world who provide intelligence for the CIA and at times attempt to influence opinion through the use of covert propaganda. These individuals provide the CIA with direct access to a large number of newspapers and periodicals, scores of press services and news agencies, radio and television stations, commercial book publishers, and other foreign media outlets." Senator Frank Church (D-ID) testified that the expense of disinformation had cost American taxpayers an estimated $265 million a year. That number has grown exponentially since the 70s.

The Church report found that
“over a thousand books were produced, subsidized or sponsored by the CIA before the end of 1967”.

Church quoted from a document which was written by the Chief of the Covert Action Staff on how the CIA executed its operation.

“Get books published or distributed abroad without revealing any U.S. influence, by covertly subsidizing foreign publicans or booksellers.” The report also stated that they would “get books published for operational reasons, regardless of commercial viability”.

Church quoted Thomas H. Karamessines as saying, “If you plant an article in some paper overseas, and it is a hard-hitting article, or a revelation, there is no way of guaranteeing that it is not going to be picked up and published by the Associated Press in this country.”

For all that was uncovered, the commission was stopped in its tracks by none other than CIA Directors William Colby (73-76) and George HW Bush (76-77). The report from Frank Church's committee was said to have been deliberately buried, including all mention of CapCities' acquisition of ABC.

Learning To Use The Power of The Media

CBS' William Paley was in later years linked to the CIA's Operation Mockingbird, so perhaps it's not surprising that his network was chosen to be one of the forerunners for an alleged secret intelligence project in the late 1930s, possibly linked to U.S. Naval intelligence, since the OSS, and ensuing CIA were not yet in existence. The Mercury Theatre broadcast of "The War of the Worlds" on October 30th, 1938 was rumored to be a test to study the psychological effect of fear based conditioning on a mass population.

The adaptation of H.G. Wells' classic alien invasion tale, performed by Orson Welles, was broadcast as if it were actual breaking news, with realistic bulletins. An estimated six million people heard the broadcast, with nearly two million actually believing that the Earth was being invaded by Martians. Hundreds of thousands were reported to have become hysterical and panic stricken, fleeing immediately to escape the imaginary invasion. Many missed the broadcast disclaimer saying that it was all nothing more than a Halloween prank. This obviously angered many, with furious feedback for CBS, but it did catch the attention of some for further analytical study.

What followed after was a Rockefeller funded study from psychologist Hadley Cantril, titled, "The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic." Conveniently, the research focused directly on the media power of influencing the human animal through fear based programming. Coincidentally enough, one of the people involved in the project was CBS executive Frank Stanton, also a member of the infamous CFR (Council On Foreign Relations). Stanton would later go on to undertake research efforts on mass brainwashing, as the chairman of the board for the Rand Corporation.

As for Cantril, he accepted more Rockefeller money two years later when he founded the Office of Public Opinion Research (OPOR), at Princeton University. While there he later helped conduct research on the effectiveness of "psycho-political operations" for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the predecessor of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). In short, he helped study the effectiveness of propaganda

During Word War II, he once again used Rockefeller money to study Nazi propaganda in an effort to employ the Nazi techniques to bolster the OSS propaganda program. From this came the Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service (FBIS) which later became the United States Information Agency (USIA), the propaganda arm of the NSC (National Security Council).

Coupled with the research amassed from Edward Bernays' studies of the human subconscious and his 1928 book "Propaganda," the research from Cantril and others after him was now readily available for the exploitation of the new age of electronic media.

The Orchestrated Takeover of the Media

Like its print and radio cousins, the United States television industry has been bought out and consolidated.

The beloved Reagan Administration was the evil behind the 1988 deregulation of our media. It was under Reagan and Bush Sr., that the genesis for media monopolization began. They also did away with the Fairness Doctrine, Federal requirements that governed our political debates, equal time, and the personal attack rule. This essentially made it easier for the right to lie and spread political propaganda without fear of accountability or retaliation.

The advent of the 1980s Reagan-era deregulation, along with recent commission rulings of the 90s and new millennium, has allowed a select group of major corporations to now purchase a domineering control of mass media throughout the country, bringing about a dangerous and unprecedented far right influence over the American media. The FCC was allowed to scrap broadcast ownership limitations, allowing dangerous monopolies that the law was originally intended to prevent. Under the new ruling, broadcast owners  were able to freely sell their licenses as commodities, with no longer any regard for the public trust.

The Reagan deregulation of our media has arguably been the death knell for our highly revered republic. Our watchdog of democracy has, as a result, been taken from us. The license to broadcast used to always be held in the "public interest." Sadly, that is no longer the case. It is now in the "corporate interest," with an undeniable financial bottom line which governs its direction and purpose. Before deregulation, a broadcast licensee was made to hold their license in the first term for a minimum of five years and then for every renewal afterwards, a duration of three years, whether the license holder was making a profit or losing their shirt entirely. It was for the "public good."

What we have now is what this author refers to as "Century-21 broadcasting," for you can now buy a media outlet and immediately turn around the next minute and hang a for sale sign on that license, with the sole interest of nothing more than profit, with no longer any regard for the public interest. This is what has allowed our broadcast media to now be boiled down to a mere six corporations. SIX corporations! A mere half dozen CEOs tell us all what news is, and conversely, what news isn’t.


All it took to seize total US media control was money and 8 years time.
From 50 large media companies to just six in eight years.

(Viacom and CBS split gives us six corporations since this printing.)
Graph courtesy of the Corporate Accountability Project www.corporations.org/media

"The gathering of more and more outlets under one owner clearly can be an impediment to a free and independent press." Former CBS News anchorman Walter Cronkite 

Aside from the loss of varied and distinctive viewpoints that are now missing from our society, we have also greatly diminished our ability to safeguard our republic and the freedoms for which it was intended. With no one asking the tough questions, who is actually protecting our rights and our Constitution anymore?

Once deregulation was allowed, the plan for the takeover of the U.S. was finally able to accelerate by having big money buy up and consolidate all of the American media.

One huge winner was Clear Channel Communications, owned by George W. Bush buddy Tom Hicks. Since the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Hicks' company has been able to buy up 1,200 radio stations across the United States, in many markets giving him an unfair monopoly. This was something expressly forbidden under the original FCC charter due to the danger of ideological indoctrination and a diminishing opposing viewpoint available to the public.

The deregulation of the protector of our Constitution is often called by many now as “short sided thinking,” one with dire consequences for our republic, but others challenge that it was a very calculated step towards the orchestrated take over of our media.

The Reagan-era deregulation of broadcasting brought about media consolidation to the point where news and information in our country is now able to be controlled. Sadly for our nation, our media ownership has dropped from 50 major ownership organizations in 1983 to just six groups today. That’s a very dangerous precedent for the vaunted protector of our Constitution. Each of these media giants is also a multi-BILLION dollar enterprise with numerous media outlets in their fold. (TV, radio, newspapers, movies, etc.)

Taking over the media is a necessary phase in toppling a government “by the people” because it is an invaluable tool in shaping the public’s opinion. Our overly credulous acceptance of the news as gospel should punctuate easily enough why people fell for the Iraq 9/11 connection. Even though President Bush II later admitted publicly that Iraq had no ties, one third of Americans still believe the Iraq lie. That is the all powerful persuasion of the media. (Being a lemming helps too.)

Rupert Murdoch says that the remaining six corporations controlling our media will eventually be pared down to just three and he fully expects to be one of the three left standing. That’s a very scary thought for those that know the truth about FOX News. For those that have been in the industry, FOX News, or Faux News as it is often called, is nothing more than a conservative political tool that cares less about telling the truth than it does pushing far right political ideology and a conservative fascist agenda for the New World Order.

The current media of the United States is controlled by a mere half dozen men. Those six individuals have total control over what you see and how your news and information in the world is shaped and presented to you. See for yourself in the following table.    

General Electric – NBC
Jeffrey Immelt
CBS Corporation - CBS 
Les Moonves
NewsCorp – FOX 
Rupert Murdoch
Disney – ABC 
Robert Iger
Time Warner-CNN
Richard Parsons
Viacom – UPN
Philippe Dauman
Six major corporations now own all of the U.S. media. Everything you watch is from one of them.

This conglomeration of media has a very dangerous concrete affect on media coverage.

With six companies in charge of our current media, including two that are defense contractors, it is now all too easy to propagandize and manipulate the people through the press. Until people give up their longstanding, naive faith in our corporate news media, they will never find their way out of oppression, nor ever know the real truth.

“If media moguls control media content and media distribution, then they have a lock on the extent and range of diverse views and information. That kind of grip on commercial and political power is potentially dangerous for any democracy.” -Chuck Lewis, Executive Director of the Centre for Public Integrity

With the media unified now under consolidated corporate ownership, literally in lock-step with each other, it’s much easier to propagandize with disinformation, such as the infamous 9/11 link to Iraq, or non-existent weapons of mass destruction to encourage our entry into an oil war.

Today's media has become nothing more than a propaganda and disinformation tool for political party rhetoric and government exploitation. Aside from that, it has become sensationalized with an eye towards ratings, instead of hard journalism and critical reporting. Celebrity gossip receives more press and airtime than buried truths.

Right Wing Talkers

Right behind our hallowed "boob tube" would be radio, specifically right-wing talk radio. The advent of the deregulation of radio by the Reagan-Bush administration brought about the one thing expressly prohibited by the FCC, market monopolization. It is now possible for one owner to buy up not only an entire market, but an entire region. This brings about the inherent danger that was feared early on by the FCC, the pushing of radical or extreme political ideology across a broad area of the population. This has become especially prolific now through the syndication of extreme right-wing programs, such as Rush Limbaugh, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck and many others. Inflammatory talkers such as these are making it onto more and more stations, mainly due to the newly relaxed ownership rules of deregulation.

With ownership groups now controlling so many stations, they are free to populate their broadcast programming with ideology that may not be comfortable to many listeners, but because of the "Asch Effect," people start thinking that perhaps this radical thinking is the norm and that they are the ones that may be out of line with society. People begin to conform because they want to be perceived as part of the cultural norm.

The deregulation of radio and the relaxation of the once stringent ownership rules has become a significant impedance for our forefathers vision of our republic.

Media Used Against Us

When George W. Bush took control of the Presidency, he made numerous attempts to develop a specific office for domestic information dissemination. Call it disinformation, propaganda, or both, the one thing you cannot call it is news.

Congress voted down the use of a domestic disinformation program many times under the Bush administration, yet the bill kept continually resurfacing under different language, but with the same expressed intent as the previously defeated bills.

Since when have we ever needed a formal publicly acknowledged government agency to aid in the direction and dissemination of news in the United States? Journalists are to help safeguard our republic, not defame or jeopardize it. Our news organizations are to protect us from bad government, not be in bed with it.

A popular tactic nowadays is the use of so-called "expert" guest commentators in the guise of news analysts. These are the same people who are used weekly, if not daily, to add their alleged “expert” opinion and analysis, telling Americans what they should believe. Their main mantra being, anything less than their opinion is pure hogwash and political rhetoric. Have you ever asked yourself how these same so-called analysts can be experts at everything? The simple answer is, they aren't. They are merely given talking points to persuade the public into a line of thinking that those controlling the situation would like you to believe.

The Bush-Cheney administration went so far as to further exploit the media through the use of retired military analysts and ex-officials to sell their post-9/11 war agenda to the American public on numerous news programs, even though many of the officials had vested interests with financial gain in selling false wars to a naïve public.

According to the Center for Public Integrity and its affiliated group, the Fund for Independence in Journalism, President Bush and his top aides publicly made 935 false statements about the security risk posed by Iraq in the two years following September 11, 2001.” Over 900 lies and our media was incapable of finding the truth? Seriously?

Our media was used against us to sell the blatant lie(s) that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction (WMD), foregoing their duty as investigative reporters and fact checkers, even though our own government sources such, as UN inspector Hans Blix, reported to the contrary. Even more dubiously, the Bush administration removed Blix from his task in Iraq and then tried to feebly claim that he was thrown out of the country by the Iraqis.

Ambassador Joe Wilson went so far as to testify that the Bush-Cheney administration manipulated intelligence, if not manufactured false evidence, in an effort to sell war to the American people and the international community, a story largely ignored by our media as it chose to focus instead on his ousted CIA wife, Valerie Plame.

We were even sold the biggest lie of all, that Saddam had much to do with the 9/11 attacks, a bogus claim that has since been admitted to be false by both Bush and Cheney, but a great portion of Americans never saw that admission as the media never ran the real truth incessantly, as it did the original lie.

These so-called professional analysts were used over 4500 times in the media, as part of a massive disinformation and propaganda campaign against an unsuspecting and most gullible public.

Even though his father claimed that journalists would no longer be paid by the CIA, Bush Jr., was caught red handed employing several reporters to push his agenda in the mainstream corporate media.

Armstrong Williams was paid $240,000 to push Bush's no child left behind agenda, a bill which actually was the antithesis of what it was sold as with the American public.

Syndicated columnist Maggie Gallagher was also bribed to push the Bush agenda. Gallagher was paid $21,500 by Health and Human Services (HHS) to peddle the White House's $300 million initiative to encourage marriage.

Mike McManus received $53,000, also to promote marriage (to unwed couples who are having children) through his non-profit agency Marriage Savers. McManus had boosted the Bush marriage initiative in his column on several occasions since he began receiving government money in 2003.

These are but a few examples where our government was caught manipulating public opinion, but the greater point would be, how many other instances was it not caught, and for what larger political purpose? What greater agendas have been pushed through the use of Operation Mockingbird?

Disinformation Is Control

As discussed previously, the control of information is a vital key to controlling people. We are essentially what we know. If our source of knowledge is corrupt, then our foundation for understanding the world around us is jaded and corrupted as well. Those in positions of power understand this all to well and they use our media against us every single day, 365 days a year, to influence us and control us.

Media is a powerful tool. It is a dangerous tool when exploited by those with agendas working against us all.

If you take issue with this, then please consider the following.

According to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report, the Bush-Cheney administration spent $1.6 billion dollars of our taxpayer money on PR contracts with advertising agencies, 137 firms to be exact. More than likely the total is hundreds of millions more, as the initial figures were only over a two-and-a-half year period, prior to 2006. The outrageousness of it all is that our government spent our hard earned tax paid dollars to spin us their version of the truth. We are essentially paying to be lied to.

And to be perfectly non-partisan, it isn't just one political party. They both lie to us.

Even when it is not being purposefully manipulated, it has been watered down to the point where journalists have lost sight of their purpose, to ask the hard questions and demand straight truthful answers.

In an OpEd News interview conducted by Rob Kall, veteran journalist and former New York Times reporter Chris Hedges summed up the media this way when asked about the depth of questioning by reporters:

"Well, I think first we have to understand that the media has evolved. Certainly, during the trajectory of my own professional life as a journalist.

The print media is dying -- is anemic. Television no longer makes any serious attempt to report news in the sense that a traditional journalist would understand it. We are diverted by trivia, gossip, celebrity scandal, whether that is revolved around a lunatic fringe figure that want to burn Korans, or Tiger Woods' sexual escapades, or John Edwards' meltdown. There are these constant narratives that dominate the news cycles and make it impossible for those of us who care about actually reporting news and investigating serious issues to even find a place any more.

I spent the last fifteen years of my life as a journalist with the New York Times, which I think attempts to retain those values of news gathering. When you talk about the traditional media -- what's left of it -- they lie, the commercial media, but they are primarily lies of omission. It's what they don't tell you, it's not what they do tell you. It's what they leave out. And they leave it out for a reason. They leave it out in the name of objectivity. They leave it out in the name of impartiality because it would anger the power elite."

Hedges went even further, stating, "Most people receive their information passively. They rely on roughly a half dozen corporations: Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, Disney, Viacom, General Electric, (etc) who control almost everything Americans watch, see, listen to, or read. And that's what's so dangerous.

For those of us who seek out independent sources of information, the internet is a valuable tool, but I think most people use the internet to reinforce their own belief systems. They retreat into intellectual ghettos where verifiable fact is irrelevant. Anything that bolsters their own world view or their own opinions is accepted as true. And that's very dangerous. It is part of the deterioration of a print-based society and by that I mean, a society where reporters report fact, investigate. Editors edit fact, and that you work to put out information that, while it may be incomplete, and while there may be things you leave out, at least is basically trustworthy.

And that is -- as print dies, as print is replaced by an image-based culture, we essentially have a culture where we confuse knowledge with how we are made to feel. And that really, if you read great philosophers like Hannah Arendt is the definition of a totalitarian system. So I think we're in the midst of a huge cultural shift, which is extremely detrimental for those of us who value the sanctity of truth, and believe that truth is a possibility. We live in a culture where opinion and fact are interchangeable. Where lies have become true, where people believe only what they want to believe. And that's exceedingly dangerous, because it's very hard to penetrate."

Hedges then hits upon a most salient point with regards to today's dumbed down corporate media: "But essentially -- the electronic media, which only cares about rating, attracting viewers and attracting of course, most importantly corporate advertisers, have jettisoned the news for trash, junk, tabloid-like garbage. And you know, as soon as this one blows over, they'll find another one."

Hedges is completely right. The media has not only been manipulated from the top down, it has also been turned inside out, with actual news content forsaken for trash journalism. With that, far too much deference has also been given to corporate sponsors and the big money that they represent.

So what truths do we really know? We certainly aren't getting it from Washington, nor our pathetic excuse for a news media.

The Most Powerful Tool: The Brainwash Box

The television has scientifically documented brainwashing abilities.

The worst of all media is probably the one common appliance in each and every home, the television, the so-called wonder of the 20th century, referred to by this author as the brainwashing box. As a society, we place far too much faith in television, and because of that misguided faith we are losing our Constitutional freedoms to corporatism, a 21st century word for old fashioned fascism.

Television is a medium with literal mind numbing properties, yet most have no clue of the interaction that takes place between the brain and television. Contrarily, there are others who have known for quite some time, and they have done their best to exploit the technology to serve their own agenda.

One of the most highly nominated films in recent history, the 1976 film "Network," dealt with the virtues and impact of television on people, as well as the often unscrupulous and immoral intentions of those behind the scenes who control it. The film received ten nominations, including best picture, while winning four Oscars for best screenplay writing, actor, actress and supporting actress.

In the movie, fictitious newscaster Howard Beale described television in the following manner...

“The only truth you know is what you get over this tube. Right now, there is a whole... an entire generation, that never knew anything that didn't come out of this tube. This tube is the gospel, the ultimate revelation. This tube can make or break presidents, popes, prime ministers; this tube is the most awesome goddam force in the whole godless world, and woe is us if it ever falls into the hands of the wrong people."

"And when the 12th largest company in the world controls the most awesome goddam propaganda force in the whole godless world who knows what shit we'll be pedaling for truth on this network. So you listen to me, listen to me...television is not the truth. Television is a goddamned amusement park. Television is a circus, a carnival, a traveling troupe of acrobats, storytellers, dancers, singers, jugglers, sideshow freaks, lion tamers, and football players. We're in the boredom killing business. So if you want the truth, go to God. Go to your gurus. Go to yourselves. But man, you're never going to get any truth from us. We'll tell you anything you want to hear. We'll lie like hell."

"We’ll tell you any shit you want to hear. We deal in illusions man. None of it is true. But you people sit there day after day, night after night, all ages, colors, creeds, we're all you know. You're beginning to believe the illusions we're spinning here. You're beginning to believe your own lives are unreal. You do whatever the tube tells you. You dress like the tube. You eat like the tube. You raise your children like the tube. You even think like the tube. This is mass madness, you maniacs. In God's name, you people are the real thing, we are the illusion. So turn off your television set. Turn them off now. Turn them off right now. Turn them off and leave them off. Turn them off right in the middle of the sentence that I'm speaking to you now. Turn them off!”

As it turn out, the 1976 movie was in actuality parroting actual conclusive data from a television research study done only seven years prior. Data we should all be aware of.

In November of 1969, researcher Herbert Krugman wanted to further explore the research of Canadian professor and communication theorist Herbert Marshall McLuhan.

The work of McLuhan had come to be regarded as the cornerstone of media theory, a study on the influence of communication and mass media. Professor McLuhan was fascinated with the intrinsic effect of communications media, unrelated to its content. It was McLuhan who first coined the term, "the medium is the message," which he wrote about in his 1964 book, "Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man." McLuhan had also done earlier work, accepting a two-year grant from the Ford Foundation in 1953 to carry out communication research at the University of Toronto. McLuhan was indeed considered a preeminent pioneer in the field.

So Krugman undertook a study to measure the effects of television on the human brain. With the help of his 22-year old secretary, he taped an electrode to the back of her head, connecting it to a Grass Model 7 Polygraph which was interfaced with a Honeywell 7600 computer and a CAT 400B computer.

After turning on the television Krugman immediately discovered something very startling. Within 30-seconds his secretary's brain waves had switched from beta waves to alpha waves. Beta waves indicate an alert conscious attention span, while alpha waves represent an unfocused, yet receptive lack of attention, similar to daydreaming. This discovery was born out through repeated test trials.

Krugman then gave his secretary a magazine and had her start to read. The cognizant beta waves suddenly reappeared, showing a rejuvenated, alert, attentive brain function.

One of the biggest surprises for Krugman was how rapidly the alpha-state emerged.

According to Krugman, brain activity flips from left to right while watching TV, from logical thought to emotional thought. The brain's left hemisphere, the side known for the logical and analytical processing of information, tunes out while the person is watching television, allowing the right hemisphere of the brain, which controls emotional response, to function unimpeded by logic. Krugman discovered that the higher brain activity of the neo-cortex decreases while watching TV. Conversely, lower brain activity, the limbic system, increases.

During this process, it is reported that endorphins are released which are thought to be like natural opiates, essentially making it possible to become addicted to television.

The limbic system is referred to as the "reptile brain" and is related to primitive mental processing, the inability to distinguish reality from fantasy. The work of Edward Bernays dealt specifically with this unconscious level of brain function. The unconscious level is what leaves us susceptible to commercial and subliminal programming.

In his findings Krugman wrote, "It appears that the mode of response to television is more or less constant and very different from the response to print. That is, the basic electrical response of the brain is clearly to the medium and not to content difference.... (Television is) a communication medium that effortlessly transmits huge quantities of information not thought about at the time of exposure."

It didn't take long for ad agencies, corporations and intelligence operations to undertake their own research into the reaction of television on the human brain.

The key phrase in Krugman's findings was that TV "transmits huge quantities of information not thought about at the time of exposure."

Krugman noted in his landmark findings, "We do not consciously or rationally attend to the material resonating with our unconscious depths at the time of transmission. Later, however, when we encounter a store display, or a real-life situation like one in an ad, or a name on a ballot that conjures up our television experience of the candidate, a wealth of associations is triggered. Schwartz explains: 'The function of a display in the store is to recall the consumer's experience of the product in the commercial.... You don't ask for a product: The product asks for you! That is, a person's recall of a commercial is evoked by the product itself, visible on a shelf or island display, interacting with the stored data in his brain.' Just as in Julian Jaynes' ancient cultures, where the internally heard speech of the gods was prompted by props like the corpse of a chieftain or a statue, so, too, our internalized media echoes are triggered by products, props, or situations in the environment."

It should be noted that Mr. Krugman later became manager of public-opinion research at General Electric. (Owner of NBC television, as well as being a large defense contractor.)

The early research of McLuhan, along with the later follow-up from Krugman, should be regarded as not only a significant warning regarding the use of television, but also it's inherent dangers as well.

"As real-life experience is increasingly replaced by the mediated 'experience' of television-viewing, it becomes easy for politicians and market-researchers of all sorts to rely on a base of mediated mass experience that can be evoked by appropriate triggers. The TV 'world' becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy: the mass mind takes shape, its participants acting according to media-derived impulses and believing them to be their own personal volition arising out of their own desires and needs. In such a situation, whoever controls the screen controls the future, the past, and the present." -Joyce Nelson, The Perfect Machine

Television programs and news broadcasts are programmed to reach us much the same way commercials do. News programs and propaganda attempt to play on our emotions, with fear, compassion, sorrow and anger acting as principle right-brain motivators.

When it comes to news or entertainment programming, physical attraction is a natural psychological trigger for trust. Humorous and charismatic figures also affect us in much the same way. It's all about trust and our comfort level with the subject that allows us to lower our mental guard and psychological defensive barriers.

Few among us are able to think past their emotional reptilian right brain and rationally reason with their left brain. Those trying to influence our minds know this all too well.

Oftentimes news programs disingenuously expose us to horrific atrocities to motivate us through fear. Whether it's war, or terrorist events such as 9/11 or 7/7, the bulk of people are rendered emotionally helpless, thus seeking authority figures to offer strength and solutions to make them feel safe again.

The invention of television is viewed by many as the most wonderful entertainment and information invention of the 20th century, but for others, it is the ultimate tool for disinformation and control of mass populations.

Another extremely disturbing threat from broadcast television is a December 16, 1997 incident in Japan where hundreds of children suddenly had physically sickening reactions while watching the cartoon Pokemon, episode # 38.

Twenty minutes into the broadcast there was a scene with an exploding rocket that flashed red and blue lights at a frequency rate of around 12 flashes per second. The scene also contained a five second period where one of the central characters, "Pikachu," started to flash lights from its eyes. At that point viewers started having adverse reactions, ranging from loss of consciousness, convulsions, seizures, dizziness, headaches, nausea and blurred vision.

A total of 685 children (310 boys, 375 girls) were taken by ambulance to the hospital. While many children recovered during the ambulance trip, more than 150 of them had to be admitted into the hospital. Two kids actually spent over two weeks in the hospital because of the episode.

Many doctors and scientists think the children suffered from "photosensitive seizures" triggered by the flashing lights. They theorized that visual stimuli from the flashing lights initiated an altered consciousness.

According to medical science, approximately 1 in 4000 children between 4-14 years old are susceptible to these types of seizures, however, the large simultaneous number of kids affected by this particular episode was an unprecedented event.

Since then, doctors and medical researchers have collaborated with Japanese television broadcasters in an effort to find ways to make sure this never happens again. The following guidelines for future animated programs were set forth:

  • Flashing images, especially those with red, should not flicker faster than three times per second. If the image does not have red, it still should not flicker faster than five times per second.
  • Flashing images should never be displayed for more than two seconds.
  • Stripes, whorls and concentric circles should not take up a large part of the TV screen.

This is yet another proven example of the hidden power of television and its direct effects on the human mind. Television is clearly not the benign instrument that we have all been led to place our trust in.

Digital Danger

And now we are in the digital television age, an era of new technology far superior in its capability to hide and deliver low aural frequencies and new digital subliminal messages. If the antiquated cathode ray tube technology of the 50s and 60s was able to alter the state of the human brain, then what can we possibly expect, or fear, from the dawn of the digital age?

Ask yourself this, since when has our government ever been so concerned that we have the best toaster, the best lawn mower, or the best stereo equipment for listening to music? The question might sound ridiculous at face value, but then you seriously need to reconsider why for the first time ever in our technological history that an entire nation has been mandated to make the switch to a new technology, digital television. Since when has our government ever been worried about how clear the picture was when we watched Bonanza, MASH, or Seinfeld?

We've made technological advances before, AM radio to FM, and even now to satellite radio. We've gone from record players to CD players and now MP3 players as well, but when has it ever been in the government interest to mandate that we all make the switch to the new superior technology?

The national mandate to switch from standard broadcast television to digital TV is indeed a curious phenomenon, unmatched in our technological history. So why the push for digital television? Is our government really concerned that we get to watch "Dancing With The Stars" or "American Idol" in a high-definition display format? Seriously? Are they concerned so much that they would give out nearly $2-billion dollars in coupons for digital receivers to those that couldn't purchase them?

Perhaps now that you understand the premise of the preceding chapter, the influence of an older antiquated television technology and its effects on the human brain, you might be interested to do some looking yourself into how much effort has been spent on population mind control. Do a search for MKULTRA, a long running CIA effort into the study of methods and technology to influence and brainwash the human animal. While you're at it, do a Google search for SSSS, or Silent Sound Spread Spectrum, also known as "subliminal carrier technology." The Sound of Silence, nicknamed S-Quad or "Squad," was said to be discovered as long ago as the 1950s, perfected in the 70s and then put into limited field test operation in the 1990s.

Remember the first Gulf War and the mass surrender of thousands of battle hardened Iraqi soldiers and their elite Republican Guard during "Operation Desert Storm?" They laid down their weapons and simply gave up, just like that. No fight. No resistance. Just a meek and fearful surrender. This wasn't reported as much in the American press as it was the foreign press. Maybe because the testing of this new non-lethal weaponry wasn't entirely meant for battle, but rather for population crowd control. Once they knew it worked, why endanger letting the secret out anymore than it already had? Why wasn't it used during the latest Iraq War if it was to be a military offensive weapon?

The Sound of Silence was reportedly developed for military use by Dr. Oliver Lowery of Norcross, Georgia. The technology is documented in US Patent # 5,159,703: “Silent Subliminal Presentation System” for commercial use in 1992. According to the patent abstract:

“A silent communications system in which non-aural carriers, in the very low (ELF) or very high audio-frequency (VHF) range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum are amplitude – or frequency- modulated with the desired intelligence and propagated acoustically or vibrationally, for inducement in to the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers. The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or optical media for delayed or repeated transmission to the listener.”

Essentially, this new technology has the ability to implant thoughts, emotions, and even dictated actions into unsuspecting human beings. Yeah, that's pretty scary stuff in the wrong hands of those hell-bent on world domination.

Another frightening aspect of digital TV is that it has so many lines of resolution now, easily able to hide and clandestinely bury subliminal visual cues and signals to affect subconscious behavior. This isn't the old days of splicing one frame of a "Coke ad" into the movie theater film. We are entering a very dangerous era of technology that could hold grave implications for humanity if placed into the wrong hands.

And now that we have digital television, we're moving fast to 3D, a whole new can of worms is opening up for us to worry about in regards to mass population mind control. Indeed, the days of Orwell are here.

Not everyone in the media is out to use television against us, but unfortunately there are too many documented adverse mental reactions and significant behavioral side effects associated with its use for us to ignore. Couple that with an extremely well funded, nefarious segment of society that appears more than willing to exploit these detrimental human effects to gain control over us, and the public truly has something to think about when it comes to a condensed and tightly controlled media, owned by greed based corporations and a select few of the ultra-wealthy elite.

Influencing Our Consent

With help from the CIA and Project MKULTRA, brainwashing has become a documented human science.

We saw the herding of America through the media immediately after 9/11 by those who shamelessly exploited a horrible national disaster for a jaded political ideology and new imperialism. The far right manipulated the people of America with the greatest tool of all, fear.

Many people simply do not know how easily they can be influenced. The art of persuasion has become a formidable science that few understand, let alone know anything about. The science of marketing and the art of spin have become king. The saying "perception is reality" has become the new dogma of marketing, and it is, for all intents and purposes, quite true.

It all started with Sigmund Freud's work of the unconscious mind. Freud had some revolutionary ideas on how the human animal thinks and what motivates us all, however, it was his unscrupulous nephew, Edward Bernays, who took his famous uncle's theories and applied them for commercial gain (no pun intended).

Bernays (1891-1995) and Ivy Lee (1877-1934) are both arguably the co-fathers of today's modern day marketing. Though their work was separate, they both figured out how to directly coerce people. Lee, employed by the Rockefellers, understood the power of perception and the need for public relations early on, but it was Bernays who would immerse the industry into a study of the human subconscious, using the techniques and teachings of his famous uncle Sigmund Freud. Out of Bernays' work would come modern day advertising, marketing, and public relations.

The PR business has become a $200-billion per year industry, with the number of PR people sadly outnumbering journalists in today's burgeoning world. Spin is in.

Bernays was the first to combine the theories of his uncle, along with those of Gustave Le Bon (crowd psychology) and also William Trotter (herd mentality), as well as the works of Ivan Pavlov (classical conditioning), to form powerful precepts for manipulating the human subconscious. What Bernays discovered was a direct link to the human subconscious. It was a Eureka moment in psychology; the mother lode for human mind control.

His revolutionary application of these ideas became a powerful tool of public influence and persuasion, for Bernays had learned how to reach peoples' subconscious desires. He triumphantly claimed that it was possible to discern the desires and fears of others and then use it for your own purposes.

Even though he wrote a book in 1928 called "Propaganda," Bernays opted instead to employ his own subtle techniques by settling on a more publicly acceptable term for his discovery, "public relations." It quickly became one of the most powerful psychological and social tools in the history of mankind. Soon thereafter, governments, intelligence organizations and politicians all adopted his concepts for their own interests.

To this day, major media doesn't make a move without first discerning the thoughts and perceptions of the masses, through the use of individual research and focus groups.

We are all being subconsciously affected with powerful advertising and marketing tools that many do not understand. The work of Bernays has continued on and is used widely today, with research people such as Frank Luntz and Clotaire Rapaille at the forefront of this most persuasive and influential industry.

Even leaders are affected by this subconscious tool, but followers are the easiest of all to manipulate. By nature, leaders and followers are obvious contrary opposites. Leaders are generally secure with themselves, strong, intelligent, educated and informed, while followers tend to be somewhat insecure, weak, ignorant, uneducated and uninformed.

Getting people to go along with a particular ideology is not such a hard thing to do, especially when you target subsets of followers. These followers end up being leaders in a sense due to their overwhelming numbers when coalesced into a unified group.

For government officials, politicians and social authority figures, it is a fairly easy undertaking to gather a crowd of followers, even without Bernays' guiding principles of persuasion.

In 1963, psychologist Stanley Milgram published his breakthrough research, the "Behavioral study of Obedience" and its relationship with authority. Milgram showed how people were willing to listen to authority figures who would instruct them to perform acts against others, even though those acts conflicted with their own personal morals. Milgram concluded that people justified their immoral actions by shifting the blame to the authority figure. In short, they claimed they were following orders, or just doing their job.

Milgram stated, "Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority."

It is not surprising at all that Milgram was also an ardent admirer of the work of another noted psychologist, Solomon Asch. It was Asch's experiments in the 1950s that dealt with group conformity and its affect on the individual (the Solomon Asch experiments).

Asch proved that social group pressure could make a person say or admit to something that was factually incorrect. He would take a group of people and test one individual, with the others in the group being in on the experiment. For the first couple tests, Asch would ask them questions that were sure to elicit the same response from all. For the third test, the members of the group who were in on the experiment would all give the wrong answer. Even though the individual who was unknowingly being tested knew the correct answer, they would also give the wrong answer, simply because they did not want to be different from the group. They wanted to be alike and conform with the group.

Asch found that 37% of the tested subjects would conform in the critical trials with 75% conforming at least once and 5% conforming every time. Only 25% of the tested subjects did not conform on any trial.

One could surmise that those conforming were followers, while the 25% that did not conform were more apt to be leaders.

So people in general do seem to fall into various categories and groups, with one subset able to be defined between leaders and followers.

A big fan of both Le Bon and Bernays' work was Adolph Hitler, as well as his Minister of Propaganda, Joseph Goebbels. Hitler based much of his book Mein Kampf on the work of Le Bon, who was considered a pioneer in the study of propaganda.

It was Goebbels who said, "The bigger the lie, the more it is accepted. If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

This is sadly true and is born out in the Milgram experiments regarding obedience to authority. It is also due to the fact that people find it too hard to believe that anyone could ever truly be capable of such a tremendous and blatant lie. This mindset thus enables the lie.

Goebbels was also known for the following...

Propaganda must be planned and executed by only one authority.

Credibility alone must determine whether propaganda output should be true or false.

Propaganda must label events and people with distinctive phrases or slogans.

Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.

Black rather than white propaganda may be employed when the latter is less credible or produces undesirable effects.

To be perceived, propaganda must evoke the interest of an audience and must be transmitted through an attention-getting communications medium.

Propaganda to the home front must create an optimum anxiety level.

It is clear that many of these Goebbels precepts are alive and well to this very day.

Another historical quote, often incorrectly attributed to President Abraham Lincoln was, "You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."

While Lincoln very well may have used the quote, it originated from circus show master  PT Barnum. Another quote from Barnum carries considerable weight as well, "There's a sucker born every minute."

It was another American President, George W. Bush, who twisted Barnum's first quote in a fashion that was blatantly transparent and very telling in regards to its intended usage. "You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on."

The Tool of Mass Control: The Focus Group

Americans would be shocked if they only knew how easily they can be controlled and steered en masse.

Many people scoff at the notion that individuals or entire populations can be influenced or controlled, but they would be sadly mistaken because they have no understanding of the research tools available to those who study the human animal. We are indeed far more predictable than many would comfortably admit.

While television, radio and printed press are the mediums for the dissemination of disinformation and propaganda, the primary tool used against us all is the focus group.

To employ all of the psychological tools outlined above, the focus group is a key research resource in ascertaining the likes and dislikes of people. Originally used by big business, it has now branched out to politicians and the media, in an effort to keep up or stay ahead of social trends. The focus group, when done correctly, is a very powerful tool in learning about the psychology of people, specifically groups of people.

A "focus group" is merely a gathering of people, usually defined into specific subsets for study, often by demographic targets or through social psychographics. The idea is to query these groups with questions regarding matters important to not only them, but particularly those leading the focus group.

By gathering specific demographics or psychographics of people into a room together, researchers can ask questions that focus on the model of personal behavior they are trying to understand and influence. It works almost too well.

Focus groups have been used since the 1930s. At first they were used for business and marketing efforts, but they soon became an accepted and most preferred tool for government. It didn't take long for intelligence agencies to see the huge benefit, but the first nefarious foray into the field was from none other than Adolph Hitler. Soon after, the CIA would become master of the craft, taking the field of social research to new heights, or perhaps, in deference to humanity, new lows.

With the advent of radio and then television, the focus group became gospel in determining the likes and dislikes of mass audiences. It taught broadcasters how to target specific demographics and psychographics and to employ narrow casting to specific preferred groups.

Today, not one move is made in television or radio without the use of focus groups and research, giving broadcasters a clearer picture as to whether they are indeed on target with their programming. Like corporate big business, it isn't as much about pleasing the consumer as it is about being cost effective and profitable with their bottom line.

With big business and the media reaping the benefits of perceptive research, it didn't take long for the practice to find its way into politics. This gave politicians a decisive edge in determining the likes and dislikes of potential voters and constituents. As in the corporate world and the media, not one move is made in big politics without the use of social research and focus groups. As mentioned previously, people like Frank Luntz and his ilk have exploited the field for personal gain, while enhancing the political prospects of their clients, whether they're morally fit to serve or not.

By understanding what the target thinks or feels about a particular product or a social issue, those employing the research have an invaluable upper hand in addressing and dealing with individuals or large groups of people. In a way, it's almost an unfair advantage. Powerful techniques such as these make it possible for people to be controlled and manipulated. It happens every single day.

Social research and focus groups are one of the single biggest keys to addressing the likes and dislikes of a society, but they are also undeniably one of the biggest evils.

Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely

As Mayer Amschel Rothschild said, "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws." It was certainly quite obvious what he meant by that, but when a man of such enormous wealth believes as much, you can bet that he also practices what he preaches. With Rothschild and his American counterparts calling the shots through their cartel of central banks, they literally have the world on its knees before them.

Hopefully at this point you have an idea of what enormous wealth can do, the immense power that it possesses, and the tremendous danger that it brings when it is in the wrong hands. It’s no wonder that Jesus once said, “It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven.”

Another wise man once said, “All power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority: still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority.” –Lord Acton (John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton)

Why is it that when huge wealth comes to some they divest themselves of humanity in the divulgence of false supremacy? What is it about the ability to have it all, the power to control your environment and immediate destiny, that causes man to forsake good conscience and morality? How is it that spiritual character is so easily replaced with arrogance and the air of omnipotence? The old saying that money is the root of all evil is a debatable premise. What seems apparent is that devotion to money and the misuse of the power that it brings are the most corruptible qualities of all.

“If money be not thy servant, it will be thy master.” -Sir Francis Bacon

"Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who possess it" – William Pitt, the Elder, The Earl of Chatham and British Prime Minister (1766-1778)

Not all persons of great wealth are evil or of moral inequity, but as noted previously, those that are can bring much havoc to the world in a short amount of time. Consider then what is possible when persons of immense wealth and deficient character coalesce together, united in a common purpose and cause. This is a very scary thought and sadly enough one that has already come to fruition.


While cabals of the unscrupulous wealthy wield tremendous power, they are still a minority and as such are subject to the scrutiny of the majority. With this deterrent in mind, they do their planning in secret, so as to avoid public judgment and the judicial repercussions that would be imposed due to their selfish greed-based actions.


As we have clearly seen, such has been the case in recent history and is still the course of deceit to this very day. The secrecy surrounding the birth and ownership of the Federal Reserve, the fascist coup against FDR, and the usurpation of our Constitution through the stealing of our media, all are clear examples of the danger that threatens society when great wealth coalesces together in the shadows, for the sake of their own personal agendas.


If the Federal Reserve was a benign and beneficent entity that was to be under government rule, why was its formation kept a secret from the press and the public?


If Congress and the McCormack-Dickstein committee indeed found solid evidence of a coup to overthrow FDR, why was much of General Smedley Butler's official testimony stricken from the Congressional record, along with the names of the wealthy families who were directly implicated in the attempted overthrow?

“Every thing secret degenerates, even the administration of justice; nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity.” –Lord Acton (John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton)

“Truth is the only merit that gives dignity and worth to history.” –Lord Acton (John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton)

One thing seems very clear, the ultra-wealthy of our nation have misused their power to usurp not only our Republic and its Constitutional authority, but the very freedoms that our forefathers fought and died for. The ultra-wealthy have committed historical high crimes against the U.S. and its people, for which they are all guilty of treason.

Beyond The Ballot Box: Organizations of Control

The CFR, Trilateral Commission, and Bilderberg Group. (BG logo taken from hotel, the same as the name)

Out of these now well financed billionaire moguls has come the creation of powerful groups that have not only worked to control the domestic affairs of the United States, but also those of the world.

Three such entities are the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the super-three. The Bohemian Grove Society also plays a planning role, albeit to a lesser extent of the larger trifecta. These groups are formed to plan and perpetrate the nefarious deeds of its members, while giving the guise of legitimate institutions of government. These organizations set the agenda which the international G-8 and G-20 then initiate into each relative nation.

The heat has been on the money-moguls for some time, so they have shifted tactics by organizing these official sounding consortiums to do their bidding. They task each of them with their marching orders, but under the guise of bettering world relations, while working steadfastly toward world peace, yet history will show the exact opposite to be true. They have failed at every level, not once preventing international conflict or war. What they have done instead is to foster and instigate international upheaval, with only their own goals of financial prosperity in their sights.

History has shown that these groups have failed miserably at their charter to promote peace and prevent warfare, but let's just take a contemporary look at their more recent failures, for the sake of truth and clarity.

How did they do in Kosovo? Milosevic was falsely sold as the tyrant. It started with "ethnic cleansing," as in, get rid of the opposition first and intimidate the rest of the populace into submission. The end result was an economic corridor of opportunity for the wealthy. Yugoslavia has since fallen in line for the new world order.

So how did they do in Iraq? A falsely accused country was horribly and brutally savaged in a campaign called "shock & awe" by the U.S. and Britain, for not only oil interests, but also to bring them in line for the New World Order. The "shock & awe" part was nothing more than a perverted PR campaign, a lesson to the rest of the middle east as to what would happen to them if they should step out of line. There were no weapons of mass destruction and the U.S. knew that going in after they pulled U.N. inspector Hans Blix from the country. Iraq had no ties to 9/11 either. All of this admitted by G.W. Bush. Saddam was a CIA installed puppet and the U.S. decided to cut his strings when he refused to continue playing their game.

How about Afghanistan? Once again, the interests of the powers that be lay in profits through a direct oil and gas pipeline route, more convenient and less costly than others. They have actually perpetuated the conflict by secretly funding the Taliban, as they once did the Mujahideen. They bribe the Taliban to join the NWO, or else keep getting their country bombarded until they are completely destroyed, or they capitulate.

The mindset of those behind the New World Order is much like "The Borg" from the popular Gene Roddenberry sci-fi program, Star Trek: The next Generation. The intimidating motto is that "resistance is futile," but as that program clearly showed, even the most threatening and seemingly omnipotent of enemies has an Achilles' heel to be exploited and conquered.

The eventual course in the middle east is to bring all of those countries under their heel for the New World Order. As we've seen openly suggested already, Iran will be next. Those resisting will be smart-bombed, invaded, and conquered, unless of course they can outwit the international elitists before they strike.

When looking historically, and even most recently, essentially what we see from the big super-three organizations is an abysmal failure on all fronts in the promotion of peace and the prevention of warfare, although contrarily, it has been a huge perverted success in making money for the ultra-wealthy elite.

Gee, what a horrific profitable coincidence.

The head of this cartel appears to be the super-secretive Bilderberg Group, a cabal of the world's wealthiest and political elite. A support wing of the Bilderberg Group is another highly secretive group, the Bohemian Grove Society. The meeting discussions and agendas of these two groups are kept from media dissemination to the general public. Such an alliance is treason under U.S. law and its Constitutionally appointed government of the people, by the people and for the people. This irrefutably makes these organizations Constitutionally illegal under U.S. law, for they conspire together privately, in secret, without the consent of the American people.

Not surprisingly, J.P. Morgan just happened to be one of the original forces behind the CFR, the Council on Foreign Relations. Morgan it seems was a man, ironically enough for the term itself, "hell bent" on using his vast wealth to usurp and undo all the dreams and hard fought achievements of our forefathers.

Admiral Chester Ward, a former CFR member once said, "They control or own major newspapers, magazines, radio and television networks," and "the most powerful companies in the book publishing business." 

Once again, we're back to the Churchill quote about the victor writing the history.

He also said, "The most powerful cliques in these elitist groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and national independence of the United States." -Admiral Chester Ward, 1975

This was a serious charge for Ward to make, one that cannot in good conscience be discounted out of hand. This was a person of military distinction, as well as an admitted CFR member, not just a crazed lunatic off the street. His comments are to be taken note of, for they echo substantial evidence of related fact. To corroborate the comments of Admiral Ward, we also have the following most disturbing admission from none other than David Rockefeller himself.

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." -David Rockefeller, Bilderberg Meeting, Baden-Baden Germany, 1991

It's interesting that this quote ever made its way into the public light. It is a horribly spectacular admission to make, but once again, when you are ultra-wealthy, a mistaken sense of superiority and omnipotence can oftentimes bring about an arrogant candor.

So under Operation Mockingbird, American journalists unwittingly helped to deceive the American public under a misguided notion of patriotism, hiding the truth while advancing a scheme of the ultra-wealthy elite. The proverbial cat was out of the bag though in regards to Mockingbird and the exploitation of the media. A new mechanism of media disinformation was needed. The CFR has since proven to be that next step of media manipulation.

The Council On Foreign Relations

The CFR is considered to be the nation's most influential foreign-policy think tanks, but as you will see, it is more than just that. It coincidentally got its start only seven short years after the takeover of the U.S. monetary system. It was simply the next step in a meticulously calculated plan.

It began in 1921 under the guidance of, once again, the JP Morgan empire, one of the driving forces in the Federal Reserve cabal. Its headquarters were first established in New York City, coinciding with the presence of JP Morgan Jr., and also the key office of the Federal Reserve. The CFR now also has an office in Washington DC, for easy access to the seat of our nation's power.

Allen Dulles joined the CFR in 1926, and would eventually become its president. John Foster Dulles, a former Woodrow Wilson's protégé, was Chairman of the Board of the Rockefeller Foundation. We've already seen the positions of power obtained by both.

Since that time nearly ALL presidential candidates have been CFR members. except for President Harry Truman, but he was advised by a group of six men who were CFR members.

Since 1934, nearly every U.S. Secretary of State has also been a CFR member, including all Secretaries of War and Defense.

Noted Americans who were instrumental in helping draft the charter for the United Nations in 1949 were CFR members John Foster Dulles, Nelson Rockefeller and John McCloy. It has been rumored that as many as 47 CFR members had a hand in the final draft of the UN.

Billed today as "an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher," the CFR more recently has veiled itself as a sort of social geo-political fraternity, self described as a "membership organization."

From the CFR website:

"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is first and foremost a membership organization. With more than 4,300 members, CFR's ranks include top government officials, renowned scholars, business leaders, acclaimed journalists, prominent attorneys, and a host of distinguished nonprofit professionals. Members participate in meetings, panel discussions, interviews, lectures, book clubs, and film screenings to discuss and debate the major foreign policy issues of our time. Members have unparalleled access to world leaders, senior government officials, members of Congress, and prominent thinkers. Included among CFR members are a group of term members. Term members must be between the ages of thirty and thirty-six, and term memberships are limited to five years."

Many intriguing observations and questions come to mind over this public admission. First off, it is noteworthy that those chosen are indeed influential figures with an impact over both government, political and social domains. Number two, the areas of discussion are also noteworthy, forming a "focus group" of contemporary thought and its dissemination. Third, that these members have unfettered access to world leaders is also quite notable and most telling.

It is interesting that term members are not chosen due to intellectual distinction, but rather by age, a characteristic seemingly irrelevant, unless of course you're interested in contemporary cultural icons of influence to sway a younger populace.

CFR members must be native born or naturalized U.S. citizens.

According to their website: CFR members, including Brian Williams, Fareed Zakaria, Angelina Jolie, Chuck Hagel, and Erin Burnett, explain why the Council on Foreign Relations is an indispensable resource in a complex world.

Perhaps indispensable "influence" is a more appropriate term to describe its members.

Taking then in order, (1) an NBC network news anchor, (2) a CNN analyst, columnist and Newsweek editor, (3) a top movie actress and sex icon, (4) a former Senator, and (5) a CNBC business anchor and reporter.

From just the brief glimpse that CFR itself provides in their website introduction, it would appear that Operation Mockingbird has been upgraded through the new CFR fraternity of influence.

The official CFR official roster of members can be obtained two ways on their website:

The CFR has often been accused by many over the years of working to usurp our Constitution and U.S. sovereignty, in exchange for international rule, a new world order, one that will be run by the wealthy elite and the large powerful central banks.

Georgetown professor Dr. Carroll Quigley is one of the few said to be allowed access to the documents of the CFR. Upon examining these documents, Quigley, a mentor of Bill Clinton, assessed their purpose as, "... nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole... controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences."

Most of the past presidential administrations have been infiltrated with numerous CFR members, including up to present day.

Official website: www.cfr.org

The Trilateral Commission

Another organization long accused of having powerful, if not improper influence over U.S. and world politics. The organization is the brainchild of none other than ultra-wealthy David Rockefeller and instituted by Zbigniew Brzezinski.

The Trilateral Commission consists of powerful leaders in business, banking, government, and mass media from North America, Western Europe, and Japan. David Rockefeller was founding chairman, and Brzezinski founding director of the North American branch, most of whose members are also in the CFR.

According to their own statements, "The European Community, North America (US and Canada), and Japan - the three main democratic industrialized areas of the world - are the three sides of the Trilateral Commission. The Commission’s members are about 325 distinguished citizens, with a variety of leadership responsibilities, from these three regions."

Many view this as just another Rockefeller vehicle for the New World Order. It is most interesting to note that Rockefeller is a significant key member in each off the alleged New World Order organizations, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the Trilateral Commission, the infamous Bilderberg Group, as well as the Bohemian Grove Society. Forget the daily-double or the trifecta. This guy is the cornerstone of the quad-squad for the New World Order.

Like the CFR, the Trilateral Commission understands the bad press and scrutiny they have been receiving over the years, hence the pro-active approach with a public website, to give the impression of an above board organization with everything out in the open. Nothing could be further from the truth with this organization. You can bet your last dollar there is much kept in secret and not published on their so-called public website. Nevertheless, here is the latest PR spin from their site:

"The Commission was originally created in 1973 to bring together experienced leaders within the private sector to discuss issues of global concern at a time when communication and cooperation between Europe, North America, and Asia were lacking. The Commission has grown since its early days to include members from more countries in these regions, and it continues to find that study and dialogue about the pressing problems facing our planet remain as important today as in 1973. Problems and threats have changed, but their importance has only increased due to the more interconnected and interdependent world in which we now live."

In a July 1977 article in the Atlantic, Jeremiah Novak, had this to say:

‘The Trilateralists’ emphasis on international economics is not entirely disinterested, for the oil crisis forced many developing nations, with doubtful repayment abilities, to borrow excessively. All told, private multinational banks, particularly Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan, have loaned nearly $52 billion to developing countries. An overhauled IMF would provide another source of credit for these nations, and would take the big private banks off the hook. This proposal is the cornerstone of the Trilateral plan.

Senator Barry Goldwater wrote in his in his book "With No Apologies," that the Trilateral Commission was ‘David Rockefeller’s newest international cabal." Goldwater also stated, ‘It is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial, and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States.’

Wow. No mincing of words for Goldwater.

The Trilateral Commission even put a man in the oval office, with Jimmy Carter being the first member elected as president in 1976.

With that in mind, it is often difficult to understand the "October Surprise" from the Reagan-Bush team in 1980. An interesting time to switch horses to the image icon, puppet Reagan, with ex-CIA Director George HW Bush actually behind the scenes running the show (Iran-Contra, CIA drug running, etc).

Official website: www.trilateral.org

(More to come...)

The Bilderberg Group

Probably the most nefarious of all, considered by many to be the head, or upper echelon of the plot for a New World Order is the highly secretive Bilderberg Group, once again with the ultra-wealthy David Rockefeller in a leading role.

The Bilderberg Group was formed in 1954 and derives its name from the Bilderberg Hotel in Oosterbeek, Holland, where the first meeting took place. The annual Bilderberg conference is a highly secretive event by invitation only, comprised of powerful and influential leaders from high finance, banking, corporate business, politics, the military and even very select members of the media.

According to a 1989 publicly released Bilderberg document, "That (1954) pioneering meeting grew out of the concern expressed by many leading citizens on both sides of the Atlantic that Western Europe and North America were not working together as closely as they should on matters of critical importance. It was felt that regular, off-the-record discussions would help create a better understanding of the complex forces and major trends affecting Western nations in the difficult post-war period."

The operative word in that official announcement is "off-the-record discussions," as in secretive, or not for public scrutiny. Attendees are not allowed to divulge the topics or conversations discussed. With this in mind, it leads one to believe that any select media members present are there specifically for indoctrination on upcoming, future group efforts, with spin control and disinformation as the primary focus.

Bilderberg meetings are held in secure, remote places. Those attending try to evade identification and are told to leave aides, secretaries and spouses at home.

It is at these meetings that future political leaders and members are said to be vetted, to assess their abilities and loyalty to following the group's aims for a New World Order.

A most interesting twist is that military security is used for these private meetings, a notable point which is highly suggestive, if not blatantly indicative, of the tremendous influence and power that is wielded by this super-secretive group. No private security force or hired thugs with guns, but rather military power is employed to protect these clandestine meetings. That in itself speaks volumes about those wielding the power, but it also says a great deal about the personal concerns of this secretive cabal. Such extreme security measures suggest that this group indeed has its own paranoid fear, and seemingly is not without its own enemies.

Official website: None

The Bohemian Grove Society

This California secret society is an exclusive club of the powerful elite, most with ties to the Trilateral Commission, the CFR and also the Bilderberg Group. Based in a secluded 2,700 acre retreat in the Monte Rio Redwood forests of Sonoma County, the powerful elite have met here every July since 1873, with the top figures of finance, government, politics, and corporate business in attendance, very much the same as for the aforementioned super-three secret power organizations. High stakes international policy is discussed at the meetings, but rumors of debauchery, sexual deviancy and occult ceremonies have also followed this elite retreat for many years.

A significant feature of the grove is a massive 40 foot concrete owl which symbolizes knowledge and is also the backdrop for the occult-like cremation of care ceremony where mock sacrifices are said to take place.

The grove sits along River Road, between interstate 101 and coastal highway 1. This author has witnessed firsthand the numerous armored limousines making the trek to the annual event. Political figures in attendance over the years include Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, George HW Bush, Dick Cheney, Casper Weinberger, George Schultz, James Baker, David Gergen, William F. Buckley Jr., Arnold Schwarzenegger, as well as wealthy elite such as David Rockefeller, Rupert Murdoch, and more than likely JP Morgan in his day. It is a who's who of the power elite.

Consider this quote from Richard M. Nixon:

"If I were to choose the speech that gave me the most pleasure and satisfaction in my political career, it would be my Lakeside Speech at the Bohemian Grove in July 1967. Because this speech traditionally was off the record it received no publicity at the time. But in many important ways it marked the first milestone on my road to the presidency." -President Richard Nixon, Memoirs (1978).

Since these meetings are held in secret, this could once again be considered as a treasonous affair since it out of the purview of Congress and the American public.

Official website: None

Common Links

If you're wondering how many elitist groups it takes to screw in an NWO light bulb, the answer would be, as many as it takes to deflect attention from just one source.

It would appear that the more organizations there are working for a global agenda, it gives the appearance that the cause is a common universal effort, justified by the sheer volume of those working towards the goal.

Having multiple organizations working for the banker's cause clearly takes the heat off of the elite central bankers. This is the reason they created these institutions in the first place. It was JP Morgan Jr. who was behind the CFR and it was David Rockefeller who created the Trilateral Commission. With larger organizations to steer the effort, the spotlight would thus be cast elsewhere, instead of shining so brightly on Morgan or Rockefeller. The Bilderberg group might also be said to do the same for the Rothschilds.

What is most troubling among these big super-three institutions are the common personnel links that you find throughout these organizations, providing an undeniable, centralized, yet diminutive cartel of authority, a tightly controlled base of power held by an elite few. By dictionary definition, a cabal.

David Rockefeller

Once again we have one common name in a leading position in the top four most secret organizations, the ultra-wealthy David Rockefeller. Rather than cast unfair aspersions, we'll simply quote Mr. Rockefeller in his own words:

“Some even believe we (Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” -David Rockefeller, 2002 Memoirs

Like JP Morgan and Paul Warburg, Rockefeller is committed to an international order, one in which only the uber-rich will wield control. So much for the sovereignty of the U.S. and the republic of our forefathers. Under men such as these, government of the people, by the people and for the people is an irresponsible notion, one that needs to be done away with, according to them.

Rothschild Family

The Rothschild family has been accused of much over the years, but unlike their American counterparts, this dynasty has done its best to keep it family name off the official rosters of the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderbergs. Instead they will send lieutenants of the family to do their bidding, such as General The Lord Guthrie, Director, N M Rothschild & Sons, London;  Member of the House of Lords; former Chief of the Defence Staff, London, and also Alfonso Cortina, Vice Chairman of Rothschild Europe, and Senior Advisor for Spain and Latin America Rothschild.

Since the CFR is an American only group, the Rothschilds have no known involvement there, but one can only assume they have paid emissaries representing their interests.

Henry Kissinger

This foreign born, yet naturalized citizen has had his hands in the admittedly corrupt Nixon administration, the arguably inept Ford administration, plus the treasonous Reagan-Bush administration.

Most should understand the corrupt label for Nixon. That by itself should stand without challenge. Nixon was also a fawning protégé of Prescott Bush, so he learned from one of the best when it came to unscrupulous clandestine activity. Kissinger was devoutly loyal to Nixon, which certainly leads some to question his moral judgment.

As for Ford, he was part of the Warren Commission cover-up of the assassination of JFK. His commission had the first crack at fresh evidence, yet they horribly bungled, or purposefully covered up the investigation. The second commission that investigated many years later disagreed with Ford and his Commission peers, stating unequivocally that there was more than one shooter and there was indeed more than likely an organized conspiracy. Many have speculated that Ford was given his presence in the administration as payback for his role in the Warren Commission.

For those taking issue with a treason charge for Reagan-Bush, they should re-examine their history books, specifically the Walsh Commission and the highly illegal Iran-Contra affair. Brokering a deal with Iran to hold American hostages until the Reagan-Bush team was in office is clear treason. The arms sale to the Contras was also an illegal activity. Reagan disavowed the entire operation on national television, but eventually was forced to come clean, only after it was proven that his administration was indeed guilty as charged. Numerous indictments and convictions were rendered, however George HW Bush pardoned them all. Many have said that Reagan himself was an unwitting pawn during his two terms, a figurehead for Americans to rally around, with ex-CIA operative and former Director George HW Bush as the engine inside the administration.

Kissinger has freely associated himself with highly questionable infamous figureheads and presidential administrations, as well as being a longtime member in the trifecta of NWO organizations, just like Rockefeller. They, however, are not alone in this cabal.

Zbigniew Brzezinski

Like Rockefeller and Kissinger, Mr. Brzezinski has also had his hand in far too many cookie jars, also earning the NWO trifecta by being part of the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, and the Bilderberg Group. Like Kissinger he is foreign born. He served in the JFK, LBJ, Carter and George HW Bush administrations. A former director of the CFR as well as a former trustee of the Trilateral Commission, he is also long rumored to be a member of the Bilderberg Group. Brzezinski is said to be a protégé of Nelson A. Rockefeller.

Brzezinski, was interviewed once for a French publication, Le Nouvel Observateur, and he was most candid, if not arrogantly boastful, about coercing the Soviet Union to initiate a military intervention to support their allied government in Kabul, Afghanistan.

Brezinski was asked if he regretted coercing the Soviet incursion, to which he replied, "Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire."

When asked if he regretted having supported and armed Islamic terrorists, he matter of factly stated, "What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?"

Some might argue that the present evil has now eclipsed the former threat, but it is of no matter to Brzezinski. Afghanistan was merely wanted for it oil and gas routes. The U.S. has been secretly funding the Taliban, so all is going according to plan if you were to ask  Brzezinski.

George HW Bush

Not only was he the Director for the world's most inauspicious intelligence agency, the CIA, he has also served in the super-three of New World Order organizations.

He was part of the Iran-Contra scandal and has been linked by some to not only the Bay of Pigs invasion, but also the JFK assassination. His family also had a most coincidental link to the Hinckley family, as in would-be assassin John Hinkley, who would have handed the presidency to HW much sooner if Reagan had died in the bungled assassination attempt. To be fair to Hinckley though, reporter and now news anchor Judy Woodruff testified that the shots that hit Reagan did not come from down the sidewalk near Hinckley, but from overhead, from a nearby balcony.

Bush also is infamous for making many New World Order speeches, particularly September 11th, 1991, just ten years to the date from the actual 9/11 event. What an extraordinary coincidence.

Other notables included just so happen to be the heads of the Federal Reserve System, representing the cartel responsible for the greatest coup ever perpetrated upon America.

Tim Geithner - Federal Reserve Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Commission.

Alan Greenspan - Federal Reserve Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Commission

Paul Volcker - Federal Reserve Chairman, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Commission, as well as chairman of the prominent New York investment banking firm, J. Rothschild & Wolfensohn Company.

There are almost too many to list showing cross membership in these super-three NWO organizations. This very much leads a great many to cry collusion, for which they would certainly have a very strong case to make, in light of the evidence to support the claim.

The Point Is...

We could go on and on citing select members who belong to all three of these groups, however, this piece would also be remiss in not mentioning one other important link that these individuals share in, they are all past participants and members of the Bohemian Grove Society as well.

The gist of these name mentions is not only to highlight orchestrated collusion from key ultra-wealthy and politically influential individuals, but also to point out un-American and un-Constitutional activity by U.S. political leaders and government employees, Our U.S. Constitution does not allow for U.S. political figures to become involved in entangling foreign alliances which set about to usurp U.S. law and the sovereignty of the nation. Again, to do so is by definition, a treasonous affair.

Secret Societies

Ritual ceremonies, like this one, take place among the elite at the private Bohemian Grove retreat.

Many who question the behind the scenes power elite will quite often refer to the secret societies, long rumored to exist amongst us, such as the fabled Illuminati, the Masons, and the Skull & Bones Society of Yale University. This author can offer no historical proof to substantiate the Illuminati, however the Masons and Skull & Bones are publicly acknowledged organizations.

This author does not wish to delve into these so-called secret societies, for their membership still has to come from the influential elite. Instead I would rather offer a few links for your personal review, and continue on instead with following the money trail.

Skull & Bones

Skull and Bones is said to be the oldest of Yale's secret societies and by far the most determinedly secretive. I guess the question is, just how many secret societies does Yale have?

Skull & Bones is indeed an acknowledged fraternity of Yale University, however its membership and meetings are highly secretive. Many of the wealthy and political elite Yale graduates have been named, such as the Bush lineage, Prescott, George HW and George W Bush. John Kerry is also said to be a "Bonesman." Both he and George W. Bush were asked point blank about the order during the 2004 presidential campaign, with both coyly answering with a smile on their face, "it's a secret."

(More to come...)

Skull and Bones, The Yale Secret Society

Official website: None

Society of the Elect

Another alleged secret society was formed by gold and diamond magnate Cecil Rhodes in 1891, appropriately enough named, the "Society of the Elect." According to Rhodes, their mission was to "absorb the wealth of the world" and "to take the government of the whole world." The Rhodes Trust was established in 1902 with a total of 90 Rhodes Scholarships awarded each year by the Rhodes foundation.

According to Prof. Carroll Quigley, in The Anglo-American Establishment, Rhodes' secret society will have more than enough members holding key positions within the areas of education, journalism, politics, economics, thus giving the society a political foothold in the world through a network of the elite. These individuals share the cause of a one world government.

"The (Rhodes) scholarships were merely a façade to conceal the secret society, or, more accurately, they were to be one of the instruments by which members of the secret society could carry out Rhodes' purpose." -Professor Carroll Quigley

The Washington Post wrote a piece on Prof. Quigley regarding his ability to befriend such powerful, secret societies. The article was titled "The Professor Who Knew Too Much," (March 23, 1975). The article wrote about Quigley and his information which is said to have been obtained from the power elite's "secret records."

Official website: http://www.rhodesscholar.org

Masonic Order

A group that has been around for centuries, so you know they have devotion and allegiance. The Masonic Order is said to be open, however allegations of an upper tier of elders has long been rumored, with 33 degrees of hierarchy to the order, with only those of the 33rd degree possessing the full knowledge and purpose of the group.

Some of our founding fathers were said to be Masons, Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, John Paul Jones, Robert Livingston, Paul Revere, and George Washington. Of the 56 signers of The Declaration of Independence, eight were known Masons.

Few know that the design of the streets in Washington are laid out in Masonic symbols that can be viewed from overhead. Many of the monuments are designed after Masonic symbols. The Washington monument is most prominent and traces back to early Egypt. It is an ancient obelisk of specific proportions, often recalled to in ancient times as the shaft of Baal. You can find more information on the Masonic symbols and layout of Washington DC here... http://dcsymbols.com/index.htm

Official website: http://www.freemason.org/index.htm


The Illuminati are akin to occult groups much the same way the Bilderbergs are to the Trilateral Commission and the CFR, they are the top rung of the ladder. Much has been written about this group, with very little of a benign nature. Some claim the Illuminati were founded in Bavaria, Germany in 1776, while others claim much older ancestry lasting for millennia. They were originally said to be called Perfectibilists, but the name was allegedly changed at a later date to the Illuminati, short for the illuminated ones, or the enlightened.

The group is said to comprise thirteen elite bloodline families of great wealth, knowledge and power, with control over much of society. They are rumored to be linked to many secret societies that commonly link back to the ancient world. They are said to possess great ancient wisdom which they strive to keep to themselves, all the while withholding knowledge for their own exploitation and to keep the vast populace in the dark.

The pyramid has long been a symbol for this group, with the all seeing eye of Ra at its top. You have seen this represented many times in your life, most specifically on the back of U.S. currency and other financial institutions.

Very little is known about the people at the very top of the Illuminati, due to their extreme emphasis on secrecy.

You are free to search on your own for more on this group and their occult historical connections for your own enlightenment.

Official website: none

The Iluminati

Illuminati – Enlightened Society

Illuminati Conspiracy Archive

Truth & Consequences

The organizations of the elite, the Bilderbergs, the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, and even the Bohemian Grove Society, are all earnestly working for an international order. The question is, will this global focus usurp the sovereignty of nations, including the United states, and our forefathers dream of a republic governed "of the people, by the people and for the people?"

Much of the subject matter in this article you won't of course get from our bought and paid for corporate controlled media. This is information you need to research extensively on your own, while it is still available, before the victor rewrites history.

Many try to write it all off as "conspiracy theory," but that is one of the greatest ruses of all. Much is greatly diminished or simply washed away through the purposeful and calculated conditioned brainwashing of this highly marketed and much maligned phrase.

The "Conspiracy Theory" Fallacy

When those within government are implicated or caught in the act of heinous deeds, they immediately paint those making the allegations as conspiracy theorists. In a calculated fashion they carefully insinuate that any charges are totally unfounded and without merit. The inference they intentionally work to convey is that those who have uncovered the truth are mentally unstable and not reliable sources to be believed. Whether it be Pearl Harbor, MLK, JFK, RFK, or 9/11, the tactic is always the same, discredit the messenger.

Two little words, "conspiracy theory," that’s all it seems to take these days to discount the truth, but if you consider the nonsense in the argument, or therein the actual lack of a tenable argument, it’s quite easy to see the absurdity in such a weak premise.

Why is it okay for some in the government to cry conspiracy whenever they want, yet at the same time negate the theory and belittle the term when others make the same claim against the government?

The point here is, conspiracy, by its definition, is okay with the government when it is assigned by official sources, but clearly it is not considered plausible when suggested by those that are not in a position of power. How is this justified?

Conspiracy is a valid word with definitive meaning. It says absolutely nothing about having a contrarian point of view. It merely denotes a sad fact of life.

To all the myriad parrots in the mainstream media…from the Chronicle, the Examiner, the Post and the Times, to CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, FOX and the likes of corporate mouthpieces such as Ted Koppel, Diane Sawyer, Charlie Gibson, Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Cooper, Campbell Brown, Joe Scarborough and a countless horde of others, to talk blowhards like Rush Limbaugh, as well as numerous shills such as Neil Cavuto, Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity… conspiracy is a legitimate word. If only they would take the time to look it up between their make-up and blow-comb sessions. If they continue to refuse to entertain it, or give it the proper respect with which it is owed, then just maybe, quite possibly, they are also part of it.

Great men and women have died trying to expose it, while the weak and evil have killed in an effort to hide it.

The point is, conspiracy is real, especially so within the halls of government power. To claim that conspiracies can only come from foreign enemies is contrary to reality. To believe that there are no political groups with nefarious, grandiose agendas is extremely naïve. (see the PNAC)

So enough with the “conspiracy theory” belittlement. Those that have an issue with 9/11 truthers, try refuting the facts for once, rather than attack those who actually investigate and understand them.

Get past the deception. Conspiracy absolutely does happen in this world. As long as huge money is available to unscrupulous men of greed, anything is possible. As long as irrefutable power is sought by man, all theories must be entertained to assess legitimate potential and likely probability for the epic plot. To discount legitimate possibilities out of hand because someone else deems them to be inappropriate or too outlandish, plays only to the advantage of those with something to hide.

Maybe the next time someone yells "conspiracy theory" we should turn and look for once, rather than follow our conditioned response of turning away.

The truth is, the real conspiracy theory generally comes from the government, whether it be a lone gunman with a slow to fire bolt-action rifle from the far away book depository, or three free falling skyscrapers collapsing in ten seconds or less like a controlled demolition, the official version is quite often the hardest to swallow.

Historically it would appear that the "official story," with it’s magic bullet or the hotter than normal burning jet fuel, that is the story that historically tends to stretch all credibility of the truth, more so than those accounts which are deemed as actual "conspiracy theory."

The next time you hear someone claim it's all a conspiracy theory, think about taking a second look and make sure you're not just creating the environment for the perfect crime, by not looking at all.

As long as mankind holds onto its insatiable greed and thirst for power, the elements for criminal conspiracy are now, and will continue to be, a given in our society.

Conspiracy theory is real. Two publications will enlighten you, the dictionary and a history book. All you need to do us look it up.

The Big Money

Banking & Wall Street: $1-Trillion+
How do you figure the net worth of Wall Street? According to Forbes, the net worth of the major houses is valued at $20-billion to $40-billion. In terms of the combined money of the major industry leaders, the total figure has to dwarf all others, essentially because many of the other industries named just below, are part of Wall Street as well.

It is has been remarked about for years by statesman and scholars, that those who control the money supply control the world. The people behind the money supply are the people behind the large central banks, the most powerful corporations, and the one group who are able to manipulate governments at their will.

The Big Money: Bank of America, CitiBank, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan-Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo.

The big money institutions made $580-billion from the top six in banking, like B of A, and also holding companies, such as Berkshire Hathaway.

What Is Wall Street Worth? Forbes.com
Wall Street bankers are still raking in billions in bonuses
All premium reports for Banking Industry Analysis and Statistics, September 2010

Big Pharma: $315-Billion annually
The United States has the largest pharmaceutical industry in the world, with annual pharmaceutical revenue at roughly $315-billion. Compare that to overall global sales of $825-billion in 2010 and you can see that the "American war on drugs" is one of the biggest oxymorons running. In the US alone, drug sales have increased nearly $30-billion in just three years. That is a staggering increase and a most alarming social trend to take note of.

By 2013, the global sale of pharmaceutical drugs is expected to be near $1-trillion dollars per year.

Most revealing and perhaps quite telling is the fact that antidepressants rank at the top of the big pharma drug churning machine. To some, this probably isn't too surprising, since they understand that a drugged down populace is much easier to control.

The top five drug categories overall, antidepressants, lipid regulators, codeine & combination pain medications, ace inhibitors and beta blockers, continue to lead the prescription drug market.

War On Drugs, My Ass: 2009 Big Pharma, By Drug

Insurance Industry (Health): $333-Billion annually
The health insurance industry alone is worth $333-billion each year, reaping huge profits through 1/3rd of an annual trillion dollar industry.

According to Health Care for America Now, in 2009, during the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, the five biggest health insurance companies set new industry profit records with over $12-billion! The five largest for-profit health insurance companies were able to fill their bank accounts with a whopping and immoral increase of 56% from the year before. CEOs, executives and shareholders of , UnitedHealthGroup Inc., WellPoint Inc., Aetna Inc., Humana Inc., and Cigna Corp., These insurance parasites owe much of their disgusting and excessive profit to dumping their sickest policy holders, according to Health Care for America Now. To reach this greed-based achievement, they left behind 2.7 million Americans who had been in private health plans. Those loyal customers who kept their benefits, had their rates raised, while cutting the share of premiums spent on medical care.

The insurance pariahs also skim off 15-20 percent of premium dollars for administrative costs and profits. A Washington Post study which examined the insurers’ medical loss ratio, the percentage of revenue from a plan’s premiums that actually pays out for medical services, shows that during the last decade, health insurance companies are spending less on medical care and more on administrative costs or profits.

According to Andrew Kurz, former chief financial officer of Wisconsin Blue Cross-Blue Shield, "Insurance company profit margins put the industry in the top 10% of all industries, up there with cigarette manufacturers. Insurers price their products like a discretionary luxury, not something essential for health and well-being."

Health Insurance Companies Increased Profits By 56% In 2009
Forbes Fortune 500: Health Insurance

US Oil Companies: $600-billion
Standard Oil was arguably the first US multinational corporation. The Rockefeller fortune reached far and wide. While the Standard brand is not currently trumpeted, it is represented by the top two U.S. oil producers, Exxon and Chevron, both holdovers from the original Standard Oil breakup of 1911.

The top three alone had yearly earnings worth collectively $588-billion, so a few more added on further down the list should get this group at or over $600-billion in receipts. The profits for the top companies were...

Top 50 Most Profitable Businesses OIL 2009 PROFIT
Exxon $45.2-billion
Chevron $23.9-billion
Conoco/Phillips $17-billion
Occidental Petroleum $6.8-billion
Marathon Oil $3.5-billion
Total Oil (Companies noted)
Source: CNN Money / Fortune

For alleged struggling companies in an oil crisis, and the worst economy ever, this is abhorrent profit, no matter how you look at it. They gouged us at the pump and hit us hard, all for their excessive profit. The top three companies shown above took home a little over $35-billion in profit. Huge, even more so, in light of the miserable economy.

See also: Top 50 companies: Most profitable  |  2010 Fortune 500 By Rank

Military Industrial Complex: $708-Billion annually
Arguably one of the largest for profit industries in the corporate world is the defense industry. The enormous amount of money spent in the name of national defense dwarfs everything else in the federal budget. Most notable is the fact that the United States far and away outspends all other country's combined. (See the 2004 graph below)

Huge contractors such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing,  Northrup Gruman, Raytheon, General Dynamics, United Technologies, Honeywell, GE, Hughes, etc, lead the military industrial complex. (Top 100 US Defense Contractors)

The Worldwide Network of US Military Bases
How Much Military Spending is Enough?

2004 chart when spending was near $400-billion

US Defense Spending Since 1998

Consider now that the Obama administration has asked for a record $708-billion for 2011.

A budget of $708-billion would make the above 2004 graph nearly twice as wide!

Unfathomable Corporate Wealth (Power)

As you can see from just a quick look at the big money industries such as Wall Street, banking, health insurance, big pharma, or the military industrial complex, unfathomable sums of money can now be readily coalesced through a 21st century version of the "Money Trust."

There is clearly a considerable amount of "agenda capitol" available out there in the corporate world to buy votes with, to help further the corporate agenda for the wealthy elite. Enormous amounts of money can be coalesced to support political candidates, as well as line the pockets of those willing to "play for pay." John Q Public is seriously out financed when it comes to defending against the overwhelming tremendous wealth of the corporate giants. It is a supreme understatement to say that we have much to fear from the corporate goliaths who have taken hold of society.

Our forefathers feared these forces as well. That is why they had the good sense to do one other thing, to restrict the years of operation for not only the large central banks, but also for corporations as well. They knew that big money could grow excessively large, as in a threat to the state, so they limited these institutions.

Our forefathers were not only very restrictive when it came to large corporations, but they were also highly selective.

A look at the previous corporate structure reveals a judicial environment totally contrary to the present. Few today could exist under these early corporate rules.

Early Corporate Guidelines:

Limited corporation to strictly a business role.

Corporations were prohibited from influencing elections, public policy and other aspects of society.

The powers of incorporation were used "selectively" early on, choosing only those businesses who could help benefit the public the most.

Corporations were not well liked by the public. Few corporate charters were allowed, and only after a public debate. Corporations were allowed a set number of years for operation. The only thing that could save the corporation from a breakup would be an oftentimes hard to get charter renewal.

Not only were corporate charters granted for a limited amount of time, they could also be revoked at any time for a violation of law. Corporations were subject to terminations if they exceeded authority and/or caused the public to be harmed.

There were no personal limitations on matters of corporate liability. Back then, managers, directors, and shareholders were all liable for total debts and any harm. In some states, corporations were actually held doubly or triply liable.

  • Had to be chartered for a specific purpose, not for everything, and/or anything.
  • Corporations had limited duration, ten, twenty and thirty years was the norm. Unlike today, they were not ongoing charters with limitless life.
  • Corporations could only initiate action that was needed to fulfill their charter.
  • Corporations could not hold stock in any other corporations.
  • Interlocking directorates were forbidden. (Members couldn't sit on other boards.)
  • The amount of capitalization a corporation could have was restricted.
  • Corporations could not own property that was not needed to fulfill their charter.
  • Owners, executives, were held responsible for any and all criminal activity.
  • Political and charitable contributions were absolutely forbidden.
  • Expressly forbidden from attempting to influence our judicial or political system.
  • Shareholders had far more rights than they have today.Shareholders had the right to remove directors at will.
  • The states reserved the right to amend the charters, or to revoke them, for any reason they felt necessary. 

Prevention of large shareholders was achieved through limited scaled voting. This way, both the large and small investors each had equal voting rights.

Citizens used to help govern corporations by helping to set operating conditions for the charters. They also did this for state constitutions and state laws.

Special citizen authority clauses helped limit capitalization, debt, land holdings, and even company profits.

Incorporated businesses were prohibited from taking any action that legislators did not specifically allow.

For an expiring charter, the corporation was dissolved and all assets were divided up among its shareholders.

A corporation's accounting books were to be turned over to any legislature upon request.

Wow, talk about a 180 degree polar opposite change in the corporate world.

Today's Corporations: Antithesis of their Predecessor

Now, contrast the previously outlined corporate guidelines with what we currently know and understand about corporations. They are as dichotomous as could be.

We need to make owners and operators liable again. Corporations should not have rights as individuals. They are manufactured industries of corporate control, all enabled through high-paid officers and executives that should be held liable for their calculated guidance of such entities.

The rights of an individual should come with the same punitive liabilities of an individual, otherwise a distinction is made which highlights the disparity of a human versus a cold corporate entity. Justice must be served. Someone at the corporation has to be accountable.

A corporation is a legal fiction, a government-created/regulated identity for a conjured entity that does not exist in reality. A corporation cannot personally interact as a physical human being, yet it is given the civil rights of a person. This is a rule that quite arguably needs to be changed.

John D. Rockefeller, along with Andrew Carnegie, were at the forefront of the effort to get state legislatures to recognize private ventures as corporations. Up until then, only public (government-driven) ventures had received corporate charters in the U.S.

Corporations are now allowed to donate freely, in large amounts, to various political candidates that would offer them legislative services in return. This is completely contrary to the original restriction and goes against a free republic.

You can see that the corporations our forefathers tried to restrict, have taken over and threatened their dream of a free republic.

Somewhere along the line, someone thought that restricting corporations was a bad idea, so the original restrictions are sadly no more, giving way to untold corporate trillions that can now be amassed and marshaled against the state.

Our forefathers are no doubt rolling in their graves over our ignorance and stupidity.

The megalithic titans of the corporate world all have ultra-rich owners and shareholders, all for whom it is in their best interest to have the system continue to run "as is" for their benefit.

There are obscene profits to be made for those who bankroll war. The ability of unlimited money can decisively help steer the outcome of a war, especially when the most unscrupulous of all plays both sides of the conflict.

As we know, there are vast pools of great corporate wealth in this world, each company subject only to the moral guidance of its officers. These vast, deep pocket engines of commerce and/or their rich families have their own personal goals. When two or more of these corporate titans gather together for the same ideal, it is wise to cast an ever watchful eye.

The Corporate Goliaths that have risen are exactly what our forefathers feared the most. Their worst nightmare for America has been slowly coming true. Corporate hegemony has delivered a serious blow to "government of the people, by the people, and for the people." The corporation, as it exists today, is not structured to be productive to society. Its goals and ambitions are unto itself, with little or no regard for anything outside of its target market.

The Misuse of Power: False Flag Operations

Pearl Harbor, December 7th, 1941, "A day that shall live in infamy."

As General Smedley D. Butler wrote about in his book, "War Is A Racket," it was his contention that all wars were generally orchestrated out of corporate geed and/or for imperialism. As you will read below, U.S. war became plentiful after the creation of the Federal Reserve. The twentieth century has recorded the effects of the Federal Reserve bankers, with the most egregious arguably being its "wars for profit."

The average American is tragically unaware of “manufactured war.” Many have no clue of, nor understand the term, “false flag operation.” This is a morally deplorable clandestine plot which describes an orchestrated illegal offensive effort which is meant to deceive the public, so that they think other outside entities are involved. Sadly enough, there are many instances of proven false flag operations.

Americans would do well to enlighten their historical understanding of the following deplorable events.

Sinking of the Lusitania – (leading to World War I) The US is said to have given the Germans information that the Lusitania was carrying a secret cargo of weapons. A German U-boat then sank the ship, giving the US the excuse to enter into World War I.

Pearl Harbor – (leading to World War II) Some claim this as the first ever sacrifice with full knowledge of an impending enemy attack. This horrific 9/11-type event was said to be used by those wanting U.S. war involvement, to form and then galvanize U.S. opinion into backing involvement in World War II.

According to Admiral Kimmel, the US had broken the Japanese codes and knew well in advance exactly when and where the attack would begin. The US moved key ships out to sea and is said to have allowed the attacks to take place, justifying its war presence and the eventual use of nuclear weapons which resulted in a long-sought place of world military prominence for the U.S.

Gulf of Tonkin – (expanding US involvement in the Viet Nam War) The US claimed that the North Vietnamese launched torpedoes at the destroyer Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin. Former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara later admitted that the attack had never happened. Essentially, the LBJ expansion of U.S., involvement in the Viet Nam War was based on a lie.

First Iraq War – (leading to the Gulf War) The US told Saddam it was okay to take over Kuwait and seize their oil fields. We even sold them the poison gas to attack Kuwait with. The Kuwaiti Ambassador’s daughter in Washington falsely posed as an Iraqi nurse, claiming babies were taken from incubators and left to die on the cold floor. She was said to be coached by DC ad firm, Hill & Knowlton.

1995 World Trade Center Bombing - The FBI was intimately involved, using Ramzi Youseff as bait to coerce a terrorist attack. The FBI supplied real bomb material, rather than fake explosives. Youseff became alarmed and contacted others in regards to this.

9/11 Attacks – (leading to Afghanistan War and Iraq War) The Project For a New American Century (PNAC), a treatise detailing a plan for US dominance in the world. A neo-con group wrote that this plan would take years to achieve, unless of course there was a new Pearl Harbor-type event. Shortly after, we had the 9/11 attacks. This event has produced numerous evidentiary oddities that question how Osama bin Laden or Al Qaeda could have pulled off the attacks and the controlled demolition of three WTC towers, one not hit by airplane, none burning from top to bottom, yet all collapsing conveniently into their own basements at near free fall speed, through the path of most resistance. One of them collapsed in less than an hour of total fire, the other one took just one hour and forty-two minutes.

Note: The Afghanistan War and Iraq War were both planned long before 9/11.

Second Iraq War – Iraq had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. They also had no WMD. The war plans were actually drawn up before September 11th. It’s a well documented fact that the U.S. pulled Hans Blix out of Iraq, after he found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction.

Afghanistan War – They too also had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks, but like the Iraq War it is a well documented fact that the U.S. invasion plans were mysteriously drawn up long before September 11th.

Selling War For Profit

Looking at these past aggressions in their totality, it would seem that every one of these events was purposefully planned, aggressively initiated and staged for profit, as well as U.S. domination.

Do not be lulled into the mistaken premise that large false flag operations such as these could not have been kept from the public by those involved. Secrets are kept by hundreds and even thousands of people within the U.S. government. A compartmentalized chain of command is all it takes to allow nefarious agendas and provide a sanctioned cover for dubious deeds. If you have even the slightest doubt that this could be true, you are encouraged to examine but only a small list of grandiose historical secrets which involved a great many individuals, all no doubt working under the implied notion of patriotic devotion, while hiding within the guise of national secrecy.

  • Manhattan Project
  • Gulf of Tonkin Incident
  • Secret Medical Testing on Military and Civilian Population
  • MKULTRA (CIA mind control experiments)
  • Iran-Contra Scandal (Treasonous Reagan-Bush deal)

Pearl Harbor Deceit…

Much has been written about U.S. military foreknowledge of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, using the event as a catalyst to enter the war against Japan, but most notably to use the situation to establish a post WWII world supremacy through the feigned legitimate use of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The event has been charged as a “Don’t tread on us, or you’ll get more of the same” moment, for other countries to take notice of.

  • We broke the Japanese code early on.
  • Were warned of Japanese warships early on.
  • We pulled our best ships out of Pearl Harbor before the attack.

These are all valid points that implicate the exploitation of Japanese aggression for the sole purpose of U.S. world hegemony.

During the 1946 Congressional hearings on Pearl Harbor, Admiral Kimmel testified that, "We needed one thing, which our own resources could not make available to us. That vital need was the information available in Washington, from the intercepted dispatches, which told when and where Japan would mostly strike. I did not get this information."

Kimmel's testimony was common knowledge at the time, when Congress held hearings on the matter, but since then has not been openly discussed by corporate media. The fact that Pearl Harbor could have been avoided, but was allowed to happen in order to stir a nation to anger, to further an agenda for war, was the sickest of all ideas to ever consider, until 9/11.

Looking at the two events in hindsight, and their resulting wars, it is not unreasonable for anyone to question the authenticity of the history that Americans have been led to believe regarding either event.

Like the JFK assassination, neither event is anything that the U.S. government wishes to openly discuss. Usually when the government goes out of its way to stifle ideas or discussion, it is because they are threatened by the truth that is presented by them.

Spying On Our Own Citizens (TIA)

Keeping tabs on foreign nationals is one thing, but the CIA has from its inception continually broken its charter by spying domestically as well, a job reserved for the FBI and the police. The CIA is supposed to be an international data gathering organization only, reporting back to the President of the United States. Only the FBI has the legal jurisdiction to surveil Americans and suspicious individuals on U.S. soil.

The Bush II administration took domestic spying to a whole new level through a program called TIA, the Total Information Awareness program. As part of the treacherous Patriot Act, it strikes a mandate of domestic spying on U.S. citizens while claiming to aid in counterintelligence for foreign terrorist activities. What most people don’t realize is that this function has been covered quite well for many years by the FBI. There was no need for the Patriot Act, nor its Homeland Security.

Perceived intel lapses leading up to 9/11 have purposefully and falsely been sold to the American public to mislead us into believing that our domestic intelligence services have been inadequate up to that point. For those who have extensively studied the 9/11 event, nothing could be further from the truth. FBI agent Colleen Rowley has openly expressed her personal experiences of an agency that was forced to sit on key evidence which arguably helped facilitate the success of the 9/11 plot. The only lapse in our domestic intelligence came from key individuals at the top who helped create a vulnerable environment for others to exploit.

The U.S. Senate claimed that TIA would not be allowed without meticulous Congressional scrutiny to protect law abiding citizens from illegal snooping, yet as we have now found out, the program has been misused against us on a massive scale, despite assurances to the contrary.

One end around used by the Bush-Cheney administration was the employment of corporate institutions to pool public information into government databases. Financial institutions, communications companies and even insurance corporations have been used to collect data illegally. This expressly flies in the face of our Constitutional rights, not to mention the Privacy Act of 1974. A National Data Center was originally proposed as far back as 1965, but a massive public uproar led to its defeat and the creation of the Privacy Act. TIA is a direct violation of this protective act.

According to the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), "Total Information Awareness" may be the closest thing to a true "Big Brother" program that has ever been seriously contemplated in the United States. TIA is based on a vision of pulling together as much information as possible about as many people as possible into an "ultra-large-scale" database, making that information available to government officials, and sorting through it to try to identify terrorists.”

The problem with this, as has already been proven, the system is not being used to just look for terrorists.

The ACLU raised grave concerns over TIA, citing five points of major concern.

  • It would kill privacy in America.  Under this program, every aspect of our lives would be catalogued and made available to government officials.  Americans have the right to expect that their lives will not become an open book when they have not done, and are not even suspected of doing, anything wrong.                                           

  • It harbors a tremendous potential for abuse. The motto of the TIA program is that "knowledge is power," and in fact the keepers of the TIA database would gain a tremendous amount of power over American citizens.  Inevitably, some of them will abuse that power.  An example of the kind of abuses that can happen were chronicled in a July 2001 investigation by the Detroit Free Press (and December 2001 follow-up): the newspaper found that police officers with access to a database for Michigan law enforcement had used it to help their friends or themselves stalk women, threaten motorists, track estranged spouses - even to intimidate political opponents.  Experience has shown that when large numbers of Americans challenge the government's policy (for example in Vietnam), some parts of the government react by conducting surveillance and using it against critics.  The unavoidable truth is that a super-database like TIA will lead to super-abuses.                                            

  • It is based on virtual dragnets instead of individualized suspicion. TIA would represent a radical departure from the centuries-old Anglo-American tradition that the police conduct surveillance only where there is evidence of involvement in wrongdoing.  It would seek to protect us by monitoring everyone for signs of wrongdoing - by instituting a giant dragnet capable of sifting through the personal lives of Americans.   It would ruin the very American values that our government is supposed to be protecting.                                           

  • It would not be effective. The program is based on highly speculative assumptions about how databases can be tapped to stop terrorism, and there are good reasons to suspect that it would not work at all (see below).                                          

  • It fails basic balancing tests.  The benefits of this program in stopping terrorism are highly speculative, but the damage that it would do to American freedom is certain.

Notice that a specific entity is given the power to eavesdrop.

It is even more notable to point out for such a sensitive issue, that Bush appointed none other than the infamous and morally questionable John Poindexter to head up the TIA program. Poindexter is indeed quite a character. A retired American naval officer, as well as President Reagan's national security adviser, Poindexter was best known for his role in the Iran-Contra scandal. He was convicted on multiple felony counts on April 7, 1990. An interesting selection for the head of TIA.

TIA is also known as the Information Awareness Office (IAO). The original choice of the Masonic "eye-in-pyramid" symbol for its logo raised immediate concerns for many, due to its Illuminati-esque features. It also carries the Latin motto "scientia est potentia," meaning "knowledge is power". After much criticism and public outcry the pyramid logo was removed due its occult overtones.  It is through DARPA that TIA is run.

The IAO's (TIA) admitted mission is to gather as much information as it can on every single person possible through financial records, medical records, internet activity, library records and any other personal data collection for use in a centralized database for access by the U.S. government. The ACLU maintains that this is a blatant disregard of private personal information and an unwarranted invasion of privacy, unmatched in the annals of history. This information is ripe for abuse and has already been exploited on hundreds, if not thousands of occasions in its short history under the Bush-Cheney regime alone.

Fortunately there have been some within Congress who have fought against TIA and its exploitation. Senator Russ Feingold introduced S.188, the Data-Mining Moratorium Act of 2003,  which called for a cessation on public data-mining under TIA and "any other program." Feingold’s bill mandated that the Secretary of Defense, Attorney General, and all other agencies, make full disclosure to Congress of any future data-mining activities.

Congress mysteriously did not pass Feingold’s bill, but did pull the funding for TIA in 2003, however, the Bush-Cheney regime skirted the Congress and went ahead with the program anyway, with black money through clandestine means.

Operation Echelon
Imagine a system so powerful that it can intercept all electronic communications... in the world. All phone calls, emails, texts, faxes, cell phones, pagers, etc. If it's an electronic communication, it will be run through the Echelon system.

The U.S. used to openly deny the existence of such a program, let any alone in-place technology, until the EU proved its existence when it went after the U.S. for corporate espionage. Operation Echelon exists.

This is one of the key reasons why many do not believe that the U.S. had no idea 9/11 was about to happen, even after numerous foreign warnings. With Echelon in place, how could they have possibly missed the years of planning leading up to 9/11?

AT&T Room # 641A
A secure room in San Francisco that contains access to all public phone records.

In San Francisco there have been numerous reports on the existence of a secured room where all phone records are said to be routed, stored, or accessible. The room resides in the SBC building at 611 Folsom Street. AT&T maintains three floors in the building, six, seven and eight. The 8th floor is reported to be high-speed fiber-optic circuits that run down to the 7th floor where they connect to routers for the "common backbone" of AT&T's WorldNet service. All data is said to be funneled to the 6th floor, to room 641A, to monitor data and all calls on the service.

Same As Before
For anyone to possibly think that communications surveillance began under the Bush-Cheney regime, they would be sadly mistaken. This has been going on for some time now, at least since the 1990s. It is clear that Echelon was in use as early as the Clinton administration. With Room 641A storing all your phone calls, and now TIA digging into our personal records, it's clear that Uncle Sam not only likes to watch, but likes to listen as well.

The Greater Power That Is

As the old saying going, once power is gained it is hard to take it away. Many presidents have commented on the greater power that exists in this country since the formation of the Federal Reserve.

"They know that there is a power somewhere, so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." -Woodrow Wilson

President Calvin Coolidge once remarked that despite being the most powerful man in the world, "I am only in the clutch of forces that are greater than I am."

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."
-President Franklin D. Roosevelt [letter dated November 21, 1933]

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes." -U.S. Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter

"Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded."
-Senator William Jenner (February 23, 1954)

And of all the people to comment on power and authority, read what Richard Nixon had to say about this secret, hidden power:

"The nation's immediate problem is that while the common man fights America's wars, the intellectual elite sets its agenda. Today, whether the West lives or dies is in the hands of its new power elite: those who set the terms of public debate, who manipulate the symbols, who decide whether nations or leaders will be depicted on 100 million television sets as 'good' or 'bad.' This power elite sets the limits of the possible for Presidents and Congress. It molds the impressions that move the nation, or that mire it." -President Richard Nixon, from "The Real War."

Even Ronald Reagan was said to have remarked in his second term that he suspected that he was not in control of the nation, that there was indeed a greater power of influence that prevailed over the country.

Deny the existence of such a power base if you like, but far greater men seem to have known better for years now.

We've seen Woodrow Wilson grieve over allowing the birth of the Federal Reserve, and we've also seen Harry Truman lament his allowance of the CIA.

The ruling power of the United States doesn't come from Pennsylvania Avenue, it comes from Wall Street.

One Family's Threat To The Power Elite

(L-R) Attorney General Robert Kennedy confers outside the White House with President John Kennedy.

One president in particular understood all of these evils and openly spoke of dismantling these powerful pariahs of our government. President John F. Kennedy was the first to stand against the entrenched powers that be, and for it he sadly paid the ultimate price.

Kennedy was said to have threatened to "splinter the CIA into a million pieces and cast it into the wind." Kennedy wanted the CIA investigated. He wanted to neuter their unchecked authority and reckless operational behavior. Kennedy was also rumored to be in the process of forming a committee to investigate the CIA and its influence throughout the world.

Kennedy fired CIA Director Allen Dulles after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. This did not sit well with Dulles, nor loyalists who helped him gain the position. Kennedy had clearly made enemies within a sect of the CIA.

Arthur Schlesinger has been reported as saying that the Kennedys were "at war" with the national security state during his administration.

President Kennedy also implicitly understood the dangers of the Federal Reserve. Kennedy is said to have wanted to break away from the Federal Reserve system. On June 4th, 1963, President Kennedy signed into law presidential Executive Order number 11110, which amended Executive order 10289 of September 19th, 1951. Executive Order 11110 was said to give the treasury the power to create and issue currency, without having to go through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. The Treasury Department was given the new authority to issue silver certificates against any silver, silver bullion, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury. Kennedy was assassinated only five months later.

Coming from a wealthy family himself, Kennedy was well aware of the influence of money upon government. He was also knowledgeable on the fraternities and secret societies that formed amongst the affluent elite.

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. -President John F. Kennedy 4/27/61

It is well documented that President Kennedy also did not want to see an escalation of U.S. involvement in the Viet Nam War. Vice President Lyndon Johnson on the other hand, much like Dick Cheney, was tied to Brown & Root (affiliated with Halliburton), one of the largest defense companies in the world. B&R was Johnson's largest financial contributor. It was Johnson who helped Brown & Root grow in its early years by providing invaluable support in gaining huge defense contracts. With Kennedy out of the way, Johnson was free to escalate U.S. involvement in Viet Nam, making a fortune for B&R through base construction contracts. Ladybird Johnson has also long been rumored to have been a majority stockholder in Sea-Land, a Houston based shipping container company which profited heavily through the shipment of munitions and supplies for the war.

There are many reasons why the behind the scenes power elite wanted Kennedy dead.

  • Kennedy wanted to pull out of Viet Nam
  • He did not support the Bay of Pigs Invasion
  • He wanted to reorganize, or break up the CIA
  • He wanted to disrupt the Federal Reserve with silver backed currency

Many JFK researchers make the mistake of trying to separate the above issues, trying to place blame on one single faction, in their myopia missing the fact that all of the above reasons were indeed under one roof, under the auspices of an ultra-wealthy cabal with control over all of these situations.

Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy knew that he too might be a target, but instead he bravely sought the nomination for President, despite the danger it imposed upon him.

RFK was a threat because he was close to brother John and would more than likely continue his policies, threatening the Federal Reserve cartel, the CIA, and the growing military industrial complex (owned by the ultra-wealthy).

Mae Brussell once said that JFK put Bobby in charge of cleaning up the CIA, "the government behind my back."

With an intelligence network as vast as that of the U.S., it is impossible to not uncover the plots behind the cold-blooded murders of both JFK and RFK, unless of course there was U.S. intelligence involvement and a subsequent cover-up. For anyone to say, in each case, that a lone gunman was able to single-handedly conquer the superior safeguards and defensive protocols of the Secret Service and our government is absolutely ludicrous. That in itself is the wildest conspiracy theory of all.

The well documented fact that key Secret Service agents were ordered to leave the JFK Dallas motorcade, and the fact that RFK was shot at close range in a pantry pass-through while surrounded by Secret Service agents, leaves many to believe that members of the Secret Service were either infiltrated, or were in on both plots.

Two commissions were formed to investigate the assassination of President Kennedy. The first Warren Commission, like the recent 9/11 Commission, was chock full of people with compromised credentials. The Warren Commission made the ridiculous claim of a lone shooter, Lee Harvey Oswald, even though many witnesses testified to shots coming from the grassy knoll.

Most indicting of all was the Dallas motorcycle officer's radio mic that had the "on" switch stuck open, clearly registering multiple rapid-fire gunshots, too quick to come from a slow loading, bolt-action, carbine rifle from the far away book depository.

The second commission to look into the Kennedy assassination, the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), finally concluded that the FBI investigation and the Warren Commission Report were seriously flawed and that there had indeed been a conspiracy, one which more than likely involved multiple shooters. In 1979, the HSCA  concluded that at least four shots were fired and that there was a high probability that two assassins fired at Kennedy, catching him in a crossfire. They also concluded that it was likely a conspiracy, but that was as far as any further investigation would ever go.


The House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA), had officially indicated that a conspiracy was indeed involved, and yet no further investigation was ever forthcoming.

Most intriguing, if not very telling.

President John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, John F. Kennedy Jr.

  • RFK

  • JFK Jr

  • Wellstone

  • Carnahan

(More to come on

Political Pawns: The Enablers
LBJ, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, Obama

Once JFK was out of the way, all presidents since have been groomed for the office, with the one sole task of "keep the game running." Whether Republican or Democrat, the priority is to keep the system running smoothly.

Lyndon Baines Johnson

Nixon and George HW Bush have both been alleged to have been in Dallas on the day of President Kennedy’s assassination. LBJ had myriad connections and accomplices in the state. Texas Governor John Connelly certainly brought questions onto himself with his immortal words, “My God, they’re going to kill us all.” With that historical statement, Connelly made two curious distinctions.

1) He indicated foreknowledge by saying, “kill us all.” Why ever would Connelly think that they weren’t all to be killed in the first place?

2) He referenced a coup of more than one by saying “they.” How did he know there was more than one shooter, when the government’s own Warren Commission said it was Lee Harvey Oswald who was alleged to be the lone shooter?

Very curious words to be first out of the mouth under gunfire, rather than, "shit!" or "get down!" But Connelly's first thought was that "they" were going to kill "us all." He made a clear cut distinction regarding a perpetrator, rather than the act of assault itself.


First ever President from the Trilateral Commission...

A Bohemian Grove member for years...

Bush I
Bay of Pigs, JFK assassination, Iran Contra treason...

Mena CIA drug running, repeal of Glass-Steagal Act...

Bush II
9/11, Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, HAVA, repeal of Habeas Corpus...

Continuance of Bush privacy invasion policy, continues pre-emptive military strikes in the "War on Terror"...

Reagan-Bush: The Puppet & Puppeteer

  • Reagan assassination attempt (Bush-Hinckley tie)

  • Iran-Contra treason… CIA drug running...

  • Deregulation of radio, the foundation for right-wing talk radio...

(More to come...)

Military Industrial Complex Gone Wild

When you are outspending the rest of the world combined, the question has to be asked, why? For what justifiable reason?

The 2011 DOD budget will be $708-billion dollars. That is a HUGE number, especially considering the military spending graph we looked at earlier. Most people might think that if you were outspending your potential opponents on a scale of 2 to 1, you would be in very good shape as far as a formidable military deterrent, but when that number is at an overwhelming and daunting 6 to 1, that is outrageous behavior for any civilization and a clear sign of government defense spending gone completely awry.

The sad thing is, that 6 to 1 ratio versus Russia, is by far the lowest when compared with other nations. The ratio jumps to 7 to 1 against China and grows exponentially larger as the potential adversary gets smaller. That is without a doubt an excess of military spending that arguably warrants no justification.

In all of that, reportedly $56-billion is assigned for black projects that are kept from the American public, but how do we really know that is all there is when it comes to those secret buried programs?

Make no mistake about it, immense volumes of cash flow through the military industrial complex. That much is an understatement.

One thing that would amaze many is how much our government has invested in non-lethal weaponry. Our taxpayer money goes to developing weapons to defeat a civilian population. John B. Alexander was the overseer of the non-lethal weapons program through DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Don't be fooled into believing that non-lethal weaponry is to fight wars with. It is quite simply for the suppression and control of mass public gatherings and protests, an integral cog for controlling an unruly mass that might have a French-style revolution in mind.

Eisenhower, a five-star General, warned us of the Military Industrial Complex. This was indeed a remarkable event to take note of. Not only was Eisenhower an outgoing U.S. President, but perhaps most notably, he was a military "lifer." For a person of Ike's political position and military stature to issue such a dire warning speaks volumes as to the viability of the threat that he foresaw and gives credible merit to his warning.

Eisenhower said...

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense. We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security alone more than the net income of all United States cooperations -- corporations.

Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet, we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.

If we could only reign in the insatiable appetite of the defense industry and say no to endless war, think of the way society would improve for the better of all, poor and rich:

  • Provide free health care

  • Provide free education

  • Provide better food for schools

  • Provide food for children and the poor

  • Provide shelter for the homeless

  • Advance society faster technologically

  • Stimulate the economy

It is even suggested that we could forgive and cancel all third-world debt.

Some experts believe we could achieve all of this for between $200-billion to $300-billion annually over the next 10 years. Remember, this is throwing tens-of-BILLIONS of new dollars at programs that currently operate without these extra multi-billions.

This would leave our national defense spending at around $400-billion per year, still far outspending our adversaries.

For some arguably insane reason though, US military spending is through the roof. There are some however who believe this is exactly what the doctor ordered.

The Project For A New American Century

When George HW Bush was defeated by Bill Clinton, the right-wing agenda came to a screeching halt and Bush was unable to accomplish his publicly stated goal for a New World Order.

It was during the Clinton years that a group of far-right extremists would coalesce together, calling themselves the PNAC (Project for a New American Century). This group was allied with many right-wing think tanks. They believed that America was at the height of its power and that it needed to assert itself in the world and take control while we were the lone super-power.

During the last year of the George HW Bush administration, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, a far right neo-conservative penned a document titled, "1992 Defense Planning Guidance", later to become known as the Wolfowitz doctrine. In the paper, he called for a dramatic increase in U.S. defense spending. Most heinously of all, he wrote that the U.S. should consider initiating aggressive pre-emptive military action, an unheard of premise, at least publicly, under U.S. law. Wolfowitz went so far as to advocate the use of military force, even without allied support, for the sole purpose of preventing any future rivals to U.S. power, while securing world dominance over raw materials, most especially, Middle-eastern oil.

The PNAC three: Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz.

In September of 2000, the group released its manifesto entitled, "Rebuilding America's Defenses" In it they brazenly proposed an increase in defense spending by one hundred billion dollars. They also openly talked of denying others from gaining a strategic foothold in outer space. The main premise for this extremely far-right blueprint was to "boldly and purposefully promote American principles abroad," adopting a much more aggressive foreign policy, one which embraced American use of pre-emptive offensive force wherever deemed necessary. The document also stated that the U.S. should set about to "shape circumstances before crises arrived."

This is all clearly quite contrary to long established American principles and would more than likely have been met with fierce resistance from not only the American public, but politicians from both sides of the aisle in Congress, if they had embarked upon it without the extreme emotional prejudice of "a new Pear Harbor."

Such a key point was not lost on this group. Extreme doubt was cast as to how fast these aims could be achieved, even under a right-wing administration. They needed a catalyst that would force Congress and the public to go along with their plan for imperialism and power. They wrote the following in their manifesto for world dominance. "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor."

What an audacious comment to make. This is a conspicuously prescient remark that cannot be dismissed lightly. For such a calculated scheme to come together under coincidence is to forgo all sentient reasoning for ignorant naivety.

As convenience would have it, less than one year after the publication of this unethical manifesto, a select group of PNAC individuals were placed into offices of high power under the Bush II administration, and they conveniently received their new Pearl Harbor on September the 11th, 2001. The gateway of opportunity for their brazen plan for US domination was suddenly now open for exploitation. A coincidental result of the 9/11 attacks just so happened to help further their extreme far right agenda.

Who were some of the individuals that made up this infamous group of power? The list is a who's who of the Bush II administration, many of whom helped lead us into the wars of Afghanistan and Iraq.

PNAC Members In The Bush II Administration

Dick Cheney 

Vice President of the US

Donald Rumsfeld

Secretary of Defense

Paul Wolfowitz

Deputy Secretary of Defense (former)

Peter Rodman

Asst Secretary of Defense

Elliot Abrams

National Security Council

Richard Armitage

Deputy Secretary of State (former)

Robert B. Zoellick

Deputy Secretary of State

Eliot A. Cohen

Counselor to US State Dept

I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby

Chief of Staff for VP Cheney (former)

John Bolton

UN Ambassador

It's quite easy to understand how a focused collective group such as that, all sharing extremely influential positions of power and all with the same ideals, could use an event to lead this country in possibly the wrong direction, one that coincidentally coincides with the stated doctrine of their far right group.

Other influential PNAC members are conservative TV commentators William Kristol and William J. Bennett, presidential brother and governor of Florida, Jeb Bush, former vice president Dan Quayle and former presidential hopeful Steve Forbes, to name but just a few very high profile far-right figures.

It was the grand wisdom of this think-tank to see our nation begin the use of pre-emptive warfare, something which our country has never publicly stood for in the past.

With so many from this far-right group infiltrated and embedded into extremely high positions of power within the US government, it is somewhat understandable that so many have suspected and even openly accused this organization of, at the very least, either favoring complicity in the 9/11 attacks, or at the far worst, having a guiding hand in their fruition.

One can only hope and pray that there is a more plausible answer to this certainly questionable coincidence in timing for such an egregious act against our country.

Video: The Project For A New American Century
Video: The New American Century
Video: Wolfowitz chilling speech

(More to come...)

Bush Stolen Elections… The Coup: Bush-Cheney
2000 election: Florida, Katherine Harris, Supreme Court ...
2006 election: Ohio, Ken Blackwell, Diebold, Mike Connell...

  • 9/11 happened on Bush-Cheney watch
  • Afghan and Iraq wars were planned long before 9/11
  • Patriot Act
  • Military Commissions Act
  • HAVA

(More to come...)

The Excessive Use of Power: An Impatient Push for NWO
9/11, WTC collapse time, explosions, WTC 7, FDNY tapes, Bush classroom, Giuliani warned, Giuliani alliance, Cheney Pentagon stand down orders, Mineta testimony, anthrax attacks, etc...

The 9/11 Event

Those accepting the official story simply do not realize that there are numerous, outlandish, incongruities and coincidences to the 9/11 story that beg for more investigation. Those that are not part of the 9/11 truth movement naively think that the 9/11 Commission thoroughly investigated the worst attack ever on American soil. They couldn't be more mistaken.

Many of those who believe the official government version, have never looked seriously into the evidence from 9/11. In all fairness to the victims and their families, please review the following in consideration for a new 9/11 investigation:

First off, not only did Bush not want a 9/11 investigation, openly resisting the formation of an independent commission for 441 days, the Bush administration also placed a lot of restrictions on the investigation right from the start. If the truth was to be found, it would be exceedingly difficult with the following limitations placed upon the 9/11 Commission.

  • Very little funding provided to find answers.
  • Timetable placed, limiting amount of investigation.
  • Limited the scope and extent of the investigation.
  • Limited the number of Commission members to see evidence.

Who in their right mind limits the duration of a criminal investigation? To do so is the antithesis of a good investigation. If you want all the answers, you need two key things, time and the determined resolve to make the most of it. Limiting the time restricts one thing, the amount of information that can be uncovered in a short period. You're not going to find out as much as you would in a real investigation that had no time constraints.

Why in the world would you ever limit the scope and extent of the biggest ever criminal investigation in history? The crime of the century has been pulled off, so how do you pull back when it comes to investigating it? Why ever would you hold back? Without a dedicated resolve to find the truth, it certainly leaves room for many to wonder as to the quality of the effort.

Limiting the number of your investigators to see the evidence was another weird nuance that was special to the commission. Why handicap your investigative team by limiting certain members from the one thing that an investigator has to see or find in an investigation, evidence? What sense does that make? Some have full clearance while others do not? Seriously?? C'mon...

You either trust your team to do a thorough investigation, or you don't.  All members need to see all the evidence, period. So why didn't that happen?

9/11 Commission co-chair Thomas Kean told the National Press Club on the 2006 9/11 anniversary that the commission was "set up to fail right from the start." He cited the lack of funding and investigative time, plus extreme political duress, as major obstacles in their way.

But It's All Too Preposterous!

A large hurdle that the average American has to overcome is the fact that any nefarious organization or covert group within our own government would, or could, be complicit, or look the other way in such a plan, let alone actually conceive of such a heinous idea.

Would anyone in our government ever actually conceive of staging an event in order to further a political or military agenda?

Remember Operation Northwoods?

Remember the Gulf of Tonkin incident?

Remember the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993? The Yamzi Yousef story, where the FBI initiated the bomb plot and then reportedly provided the actual explosives for the bombing.

Needless to say, history does not always leave the best memories.

There have always been defense hawks on Capitol Hill who are constantly on the lookout for an event that they can use and manipulate in order to justify further defense spending, or advance specific geopolitical agendas. That is the unfortunate state of politics in Washington DC and big money defense contracts.

(1) World Trade Center Building 7 Implodes Just Like WTC 1 & 2

Not two, but three towers collapsed in less than :10 seconds on 9/11. The other tower, World Trade Center 7, the Salomon Building, was never hit by an airplane, yet dropped in perfect symmetrical fashion, much like towers one and two, falling neatly into its own footprint.

This building is the perfect example of a controlled demolition. It falls perfectly in free fall, with no resistance. For those that have never seen building 7 collapse, this should no doubt be highly intriguing at this point. The thing you may find even more interesting is that the 9/11 Commission said nothing about this building collapsing in its final report. Nothing whatsoever.

A 47-story building, not hit by an airplane, collapses just like the other two towers, in less than ten seconds, and those investigating didn't feel the need to address WTC 7 in their report? One might think they would, especially since there were so many important government agencies in that building, yet not one mention in the 9/11 Report. How weird is that?

(2) Dick Cheney Tracked Pentagon Attack Plane 50 Miles Out!

Probably as alarming as the collapse of WTC 7 are the actions of Dick Cheney after the second tower was hit. Cheney was rushed to the Presidential Emergency Operating Center (PEOC) by Secret Servicemen immediately following the attack on the second tower. What is particularly odd is what Cheney did once he got there.

DOT head Norman Mineta was also in the PEOC that morning. He testified under oath that Cheney was tracking flight 77 from well over 50 miles out, before it hit the Pentagon. According to Mineta's 9/11 Commission testimony:

"During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, 'The plane is 50 miles out.' 'The plane is 30 miles out.' And when it got down to 'The plane is 10 miles out' the young man said to the Vice President, 'Do the orders still stand.' And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, 'Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'"  -Testimony of U.S. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta before the 9/11 Commission. (5/23/03)

Even with 1960's missile technology, the military could have easily shot that airplane down from that distance. Easily. So why wasn't it then? Why did the young man question Cheney's order and why did Cheney get so upset when he was asked about it?

Was the order Cheney gave a stand-down order? Why was the plane never pursued or shot at, let alone shot down? Again, Cheney tracked it from the command center from well over 50 miles out!

How does the 9/11 Commission fulfill its investigative duty with no challenge or follow up to Norman Mineta's testimony regarding Cheney tracking the plane on radar?

(3) High-Tech Military Explosives Residue Found

A group of noted scientists and researchers has found conclusive evidence of explosive residue within four separate dust samples from the WTC site. The substance found was thermate, a high tech version of thermite, an advanced military explosive that requires a security clearance. Engineered by the military, thermate is combustible at much lower temperatures than thermite, plus it burns far hotter, making it an effective cutting charge for steel beams.

The scientists found not only spent thermate residue, but also active thermate, not yet ignited. Why there would be thermate mixed in with the WTC debris is a very good question to ask someone.

The thermate story has been out since 2009, but for some reason, those within the major mainstream corporate media never addressed it at all, even though many network anchors initially reported that the destruction looked exactly like a controlled demolition.

Each tower dropped in :10 seconds or less. Even though military thermate evidence has been found that supports the theory of a controlled demolition, the government continues to deny requests to re-open the investigation.


The government has failed to enlist or join in any collaborative efforts with those independent scientists who discovered the material, to officially test and verify the scientific thermate findings. That in itself is quite telling.

This one single piece of evidence all by itself ought to be enough to open a new 9/11 investigation. Finding a high-tech military grade explosive is clearly something to stand up and take note of.

For the record, NIST says that it did not bother to perform any tests at all for explosives residue.

So much for a thorough investigation.

(4) Many Of The Alleged Hijackers Are Still Alive

Many of the alleged 9/11 hijackers are still alive and well, living in the middle east. This has been well established already by the BBC and other foreign news media. Anywhere from six to nine are said to be alive. Many have been found by the media, which leads to the trillion-dollar question, if these Saudis didn't do it, then who did?

Many do not even know this fact and still think the original suspects are guilty to this very day. That isn't exactly setting the truth straight for the official record.

You would think that this would concern someone in the government. Aren't we trying to find all those responsible for the 9/11 event?

If these guys didn't pull off the 9/11 hijackings, then who did?

If not them, then who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks?

(5) The Right-Handed Fake Osama Video That Claims Credit For 9/11

One of the most glaring pieces of evidence pointing to a cover-up of 9/11 is the release of a particular video, so obviously fake, that one has to wonder about the people working at our intelligence agencies that sanctioned it.

The face alone ought to be enough to convince anyone that indeed this is a bad Halloween impersonation, however, the purported Osama also makes a major telltale gaffe in the video, revealing this calculated attempt at deception... the imposter eats, drinks, writes and gestures, all with his right hand. Again, this is an obvious key point since Osama is left-handed. (see: FBI Wanted Poster )

Pause the video at 32:44. Watch it again from 33:01 through 33:08. The guy in the video is clearly right-handed, not left.

How stupid can you be when trying to fake a video impersonation of Osama?

How stupid, or complicit, does this make the media look for selling this obvious video fake to the public? Out of all the news agencies, not one single person caught this? Not even one intrepid reporter?

NewsFocus has posted the fake Osama video online for downloading at the link pasted below. It is 32.6 MB in size will take some time to download, depending on your modem speed.

After watching the video, ask yourself how the media missed this obvious con job?

Is this blatant incompetence by every single media outlet, or is it collusion in a national cover-up?

It should be noted that immediately following 9/11, Bin Laden sent a message stating adamantly and unequivocally that he was not involved in the attacks.

So why is someone faking Osama videos to claim that he is responsible?

Why did the Bush administration pass off an obvious fake imposter to the media as the real Bin Laden? Was it because they purposefully wanted to fan the fears of the American people, so that the administration could bankroll their war agenda?

By the way, if you look at the FBI Most Wanted poster for Osama, you should note that he is not wanted in connection with 9/11. The FBI only wants him for other crimes, the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya.

No 9/11 hijackings are mentioned, as well as no World Trade Center attacks, and no Pentagon attack charges. None whatsoever.

FBI Most Wanted Terrorist Poster (Note Osama is listed as left handed)

FBI Most Wanted Fugitive Poster of Bin Laden

FBI Holds No 9/11 Charges Against Osama

When asked, the FBI says point blank that it has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

Nevertheless, it seems that someone is trying very hard to make that false case with the American people and the world, with the U.S. media acting as a witting pawn in it all.

Though many internationally believe that Osama is long since dead, it is quite clear that someone has gone out of their way to make people believe he is not.

You see, if "the boogey man" lives, then so also does war, along with its multi-trillion dollar industry of immoral war profits.

As Smedley D. Butler once wrote, "War Is A Racket."

(6) Conflicting Evidence Found

In New York City, a jet engine was found that is said to not be typical of a 757 aircraft.

In the Pentagon, a wheel assembly and a jet turbine were found that were also reported to not to be from a 757.

Where did these non-757 parts come from?

Did something else strike the WTC towers and the Pentagon?

Numerous military and aviation officials have said emphatically that a 757 could not have flown the impossible maneuvers that the attacking DC craft performed over the Pentagon. Air Traffic Control operators are on record as saying they thought they were witnessing a military aircraft on their screens, due to its precision high-speed aerobatic movement.

The existence of physical evidence that does not fit the perceived nature of the crime is troubling and begs for more investigation. To dismiss these pieces of evidence out of hand would be tantamount to ignorance or complicity. If these pieces don't add up or make sense with the official story, then we need to know why.

Re-Open The Investigation

Any one of these five reasons ought to be enough to warrant re-opening the 9/11 investigation. How these points can be accepted in their totality without a call for a new investigation is unconscionable.

These are merely the glaring omissions, only a few of the many incongruities and coincidences that we have been told to swallow as part of the official story.

Questions such as these should call for an immediate re-opening of the 9/11 case and begin an all new investigation into the event.

Other Tenable 9/11 Observations & Questions

Aside from the top reasons given for re-opening the 9/11 investigation, there are also many other irreconcilable issues to address when it comes to the official story. Combined with the first five reasons above for a new investigation, the following extra points from the event should lend further merit for consideration.

  • Impossible for buildings to fall that fast, unless controlled demo.
  • Kerosene and office furniture are incapable of creating temps to melt or soften steel. Yet we had rivers of molten steel for nearly two months after 9/11, even after being doused repeatedly with water.
  • No fires affected the lower floors of either WTC 1 or 2.
  • Not one, but three steel frame high rise buildings free-fell within seconds into their own footprints, for the first time ever in history.
  • Physically impossible for a hollow aluminum plane to fly through three rings of solid steel reinforced concrete at the the Pentagon.
  • Three rings of the Pentagon were breached. (Was this a missile?)
  • No wing impact or engine marks on the face of the Pentagon.
  • No large plane parts found at Pentagon or in Pennsylvania.
  • Debris field scattered in Pennsylvania over six to eight miles.
  • Four coincidental terrorist war games scheduled on the same day.
  • NORAD defeated three times. (assuming they took out flight 93)
  • DC emergency dispatch tapes and video are still classified.
  • The emergency fuel tanks were never reported to blow at WTC 7. What caused the collapse with only a few small fires burning?

Damning 9/11 Circumstantial Evidence To Consider

As if these questions of themselves aren't enough, we also have the following disturbing facts to reconcile, including elected officials who were arguably derelict in their duties on 9/11. Our top officials did not react as they were supposed to in regards to a national emergency, especially with the nation under attack. The inaction of each of these figures had a discernable effect on the reaction of our government during a time of attack on our country. (For one figure, it wasn't inaction as much as it was an admission that brought scrutiny in his direction.)

The fact that so many key high ranking officials are noted as being grossly neglect in their official duties to the nation, is what is suggestive to many from around the world of a powerful inner cabal within our government.

Please consider the following:

Fact: George W. Bush sat in a Florida classroom and was derelict of duty as Commander in Chief while we were under attack. He gave no orders to Chief of Staff Andrew Card. Bush said and did absolutely nothing. The leader of the free world had just been told that for the first time since our nation’s independence, the mainland of the United States of America was under attack, yet he just sat there. He even did a short photo-op with the teacher afterwards, so he was clearly in no hurry whatsoever to see if we were being attacked anywhere else, like maybe Chicago or Los Angeles, or perhaps even Washington DC.

Fact: Donald Rumsfeld left his post and was derelict of duty, going outside instead, to the Pentagon lawn, sure to be photographed to corroborate his critical absence from the command loop. Rumsfeld had no business being away from the war room, where his official duty was to direct an effective defense of the nation. In light of the military personnel there, the single presence of Donald Rumsfeld on the Pentagon lawn helping out with a stretcher did not add to the rescue effort, however his single detraction from the chain of command was an egregious breach of military protocol, directly impeding the proper defense of the country during an attack.

Fact: Dick Cheney was in the the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC) bunker beneath the White House on the morning of 9/11. Cheney was rushed there by Secret Service agents after the 2nd plane hit. DOT Secretary Norman Mineta testified before the 9/11 Commission that Cheney tracked the Pentagon attack plane from well over 50 miles out, before it had struck. Even with 1960's missile technology we could have blown that plane (missile) out of the air easily, but Cheney didn’t. When pressed by a young man as to whether the orders still stand, Cheney became visibly angry and whipped his neck around declaring, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” It wasn't too long after that the Pentagon was hit. (See video farther below)

Fact: Rudy Giuliani told ABC's Peter Jennings live on the air that he was told the World Trade Center was going to collapse, but he now steadfastly denies he was ever told this. Why would Giuliani publicly claim that he was told the buildings would collapse and then refute that admission later, as if he never said it? He plainly stated to ABC, "We were told the World Trade Center was going to collapse." This is an alarming statement since no one had any way to know the buildings would collapse, considering this had never ever happened before. In light of the fact that the fires burned only a short duration (20 minutes or less) and there were no fires below the 78th floor to undermine the entire structure, it is hard to understand how anyone could have possibly known the buildings were going to implode and collapse. One can only surmise this is the reason why Giuliani now vehemently denies being forewarned about the WTC destruction. (show video)

Who Profited From 9/11 And Its Initiated After-Effects?

The most common principle of all in the investigation of large crimes is to ask, who benefited? As Watergate informant 'Deep Throat' once told Washington Post investigative reporter Bob Woodward, "follow the money." That reasoning is most always still valid when it comes to high crimes, but not all nefarious endeavors are so easily tracked, especially in cases of state sponsored activity. Power and control are also an integral part of the equation.

So with these thoughts in mind, who truly did benefit from 9/11?

  • The United States (new strategic middle east foothold, with oil & gas)
  • The military industrial complex (hundreds of billions in war profits)
  • Department of Defense (budgets greatly increased)
  • U.S. intelligence services (budgets greatly increased)
  • PNAC (policies for U.S. world dominance furthered)
  • Larry Silverstein (received $4-billion in insurance money)
  • Put Option Investors (Alleged CIA investors made fortunes)
  • Bush family (Oil investments, Carlyle Group war profits)
  • Dick Cheney (Halliburton war profits)
  • Israel (U.S. fights its enemies for them)

And who were the biggest losers from 9/11?

  • Afghanistan people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)
  • Iraqi people (citizens murdered, country ravaged)
  • U.S. people (Constitutional rights taken with Patriot Act)

Those involved in any orchestrated profits from this deviously engineered tragedy clearly have no moral scruples, nor any human integrity. Their avarice will one day surely be their undoing.

Just How Far Would Someone Go?

Many falsely believe that factions within our government could never run amuck and pull off such outlandish feats of aggression for political or intelligence gain.

When people of power and great wealth collude together for empire and profit, beware, for big lies will be told in order to sell a false illusion, one which all but ensures the success of their plot and guarantees their profit.

Fortunately we have some damning instances, the ones that have been caught, where we now have official documentation on record, proving not only their existence, but of an even larger government role.


  • Gulf of Tonkin Attack: This was staged to falsely push the U.S. into the Viet Nam war, killing tens of thousands of Americans and Vietnamese.
  • Operation Northwoods: United States document that planned for the  shooting down a civilian U.S. airliner and blaming it on the Cubans so that we could go to war against them.
  • Iraq War Invasion: Bush and Cheney lied about weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq so that we could overthrow our own installed puppet, Saddam Hussein in a war for oil, basing rights, and the dollar.

Some might readily say that these attacks weren't planned against the U.S. which would be true, but that tends to easily dismiss the thousands of young men and women that we send to needlessly die for us in fabricated wars for empire and profit.

This is all done based on either a total political lie, or else a U.S. alphabet agency-backed coup. More often than not, a combination of both.

In these consciously manufactured, immoral plans, many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of innocent civilians are killed... murdered, due to an illegal war for profit and empire.

The fact is, as documented above, it is clearly very possible for factions within our government to misuse power and authority in order to support a contrary ideology, or the direct benefit of an elite order or a select few. With but a few lies exposed in the light for all to see, it makes you wonder how many lies and secrets we haven't caught on to yet.

To point out the obvious, we've used 9/11 as an excuse for illegal wars of aggression with Afghanistan and Iraq, based upon plans already drawn up before 9/11. As a result, the U.S. has obtained invaluable and long desired gas and pipeline routes that will reap profiteering oil corporations literally trillions in oil profits.

So to frivolously discount any inside government complicity or intelligence help, just because it sounds unbelievable, is foolish. As history has always shown, people will do anything for money.

Reflecting On 9/11

With the preceding points in mind, most by now should begin to understand the call from 51% of Americans who are already calling for a new 9/11 investigation. Yahoo! reports that the 9/11 topic has become the all-time top search ever in their short history. Many people in the United States and around the world are seeking the truth through internet news sites because they simply do not buy the official story, and they don't trust the mainstream corporate media when it comes to 9/11 truth.

It is absolutely impossible for "we the people" to accept the official 9/11 Report as the complete truth when the 9/11 Commission did not look at all the facts, nor the evidence in its entirety. It is readily apparent that a new investigation is very much necessary and justified in order to address legitimate questions and concerns that remain over 9/11 evidence. Not only do we owe it to ourselves to find the truth, we owe it to the surviving 9/11 family members for proper closure.

No true American should stand in opposition to the people of the United States concerning the pursuit of truth when it comes to unanswered questions dealing with 9/11. The fact that there are many important points overlooked by the previous 9/11 Commission is disturbing in itself, but to let them go without further scrutiny would be far worse.

The 9/11 event is a story that most Americans don't know as well as they might think, due in large part to the corporate media who have failed miserably in their duty to investigate and report. The story needs to come out, no matter where the chips fall.

The observations raised in this article are indeed legitimate concerns that need to be addressed and fully investigated to get the complete picture of what actually happened on 9/11. Considering the seriousness of the many questions still unanswered, anything less than a new 9/11 investigation would be morally negligent on our part, not to mention an inhumane response from an intelligent, civilized society.

This time, don't just ask for a new 9/11 investigation. This time, demand a real 9/11 investigation.

No matter where the evidence trail leads, it's time to finally answer the unanswered and bring all of those responsible to justice.

Seizing Full Control…

  • HAVA, (Clint Curtis/Congressman Tom Feeney)

  • Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, Homeland Security, TIA

  • SCOTUS ruling on political campaign contributions...

(More to come...)

Economic Collapse

The orchestration of the 2nd great depression, undoing all that labor has won,
destruction of the middle class...

Our vaunted and oft heralded system of capitalism has collapsed into ruin twice now in less than 80 years, 1929 and 2008.

The President that led us into the great depression was a Republican, Herbert Hoover. The President who led us out of it was a Democrat, Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

The President who led us into the latest economic collapse was a Republican, George W. Bush. The President now trying to lead us out is a Democrat, Barack H. Obama.

(More to come...)

Orchestrated Distractions…

Katrina… Flood walls were detonated… 3 large explosions (Gloria Guy)
Gulf oil spill… Halliburton worked on rig up to explosion
No more 9/11 thermate discussion… no more audit of Federal Reserve
Gulf coast property grab

(More to come...)

Divide And Conquer
Political division, racial division...

My kind of loyalty was loyalty to one's country, not to its institutions or its office holders. -Mark Twain

People need to understand that the real fight in this country isn't the sideshow going on between our awful two-party system in which we are politically enslaved. The real fight is class warfare between us and the uber-rich...

(More to come...)

What’s It All About? Class Warfare & World Domination

All in all, it's simply class warfare, period. The two-party political trap that this country is shackled with is being manipulated the last decade to foment division in this country, all the while the 1% that control it all make hay at our expense. The political sideshow that we have been subjected to is a circus and nothing more.

Professor Carroll Quigley said in his contemporary classic "Tragedy and Hope," that William C. Whitney and others of wealth in the late 19th century developed a plan whereby they would control both major political parties through financial contributions, and then have those parties alternate power so that the public would think it had a choice.

That some people are of unscrupulous and immoral behavior and actually took the time to think of such an idea is worrisome enough, but the most worrisome fact of the matter is, there are deep enough pockets out there that could easily fund such an endeavor. An enticing argument could certainly be made that someone already has, but again, the left-right divide is all nothing more than a sideshow, to keep us from a common focus, bad government, no matter the party.

Michael Ruppert explained it quite well when asked about democrats and republicans, "It's organized crime. You call the Republicans the Genovese and you call the Democrats the Gambinos."

Ruppert elaborated further, "The people at the top they treat it like a crap game, like it's their crap game, like they're making lots of money. Occasionally someone at the table shoots each other, but the moment anything threatens their crap game, they all unite to protect it."

We have been trained to look at politics as only left or right, rather than the entire overall picture of what's best for all of us. As a nation, we have essentially lost sight of the big picture.

As it stands now, a federally funded two-party system is not the best political model of representation for 300-million+ people of varying ethnicities and cultures. It cannot possibly be, yet... so far it seems, we've all been led along quite well enough into thinking that it is, haven't we?

People need to understand that the real fight in this country isn't the sideshow going on between our awful two-party system in which we are politically enslaved. The real fight is class warfare between the rest of us and the uber-rich, the 1% that own it all and pay little in taxes, hiding their assets while exploiting every single tax loophole and offshore shelter that they can.

Those in support of tax breaks for the rich should take a hard look at the August 2008 GAO report which states quite clearly that nearly two-thirds of U.S. companies and 68% of foreign corporations do not pay federal income taxes, according to a congressional report in August 2008. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) examined samples of corporate tax returns filed between 1998 and 2005. In that time period, an annual average of 1.3 million U.S. companies and 39,000 foreign companies doing business in the United States paid no income taxes - despite having a combined $2.5 trillion in revenue.

These corporate free loaders burden our tax-paid infrastructure by wearing down our roads with their massive delivery trucks, yet they essentially leave it up to us to pay the bill for our nation's highways and roads. They burden us with environmental pollution, but expect the American taxpayer to clean up after them for their repeated and disastrous offenses. They fight for our retail patronage as well as our tax money, then reap the benefits of wealth, yet pay no taxes back into a rigged system that is forced back upon the middle and lower classes, leaving us to pay for everything. Where is the fairness in that?

They deplete our raw materials for their own profits, all the while destroying our basic infrastructure, such as our roadways with their heavy trucks, or our environment with their toxic pollution.

There is class warfare in this country, make no mistake about it. Just as the super-rich tried to do-in FDR and establish a fascist regime in America, with the Morgan family, the DuPonts, the Remingtons and Prescott Bush's involvement, etc, etc, (see bonus army revolution and General Smedley D. Butler) they are now working to do it again.

“There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” - Warren Buffett, 112606 NY Times

If the "St. Ronnie" trickle down theory actually worked, then ask yourself why the hell we spiraled into an economic meltdown WITHIN seven to eight years after the Bush tax cuts for the 1% that own it all?? This matter of factly proves that giving tax breaks to the rich does not "trickle down" to the middle and lower classes. If it did, we wouldn't be in the economic mess that sprang from the final years of the Bush-Cheney administration.

This argument on taxing the upper class truly has nothing to do with the conservative far-right who support it. It could, for all intents and purposes, be liberals espousing the same theory, for there are rich progressives as well, but facts are what they are. The Reagan "trickle-down" theory simply does not work. The ultra-wealthy do nothing but pocket their profits and grow richer and far more powerful when given generous tax breaks from the government. This is proven historical fact, substantiated beyond a shadow of a doubt by IRS data. The richest 400 Americans actually doubled their incomes during the Bush-Cheney years, all the while their tax rate plummeted all the way from 29.4% down to 16.6%. In 2007, their average income was $344.8-million per year, up from $263.3-million from 2006!

Oh the horror and hardship. How ever do they pay their servants?

These ultra-wealthy elite received a 27 percent increase in their annual income. This is nine times the rate of increase for the bottom 90 percent. Here's an extra piece to chew on. Since 1992, the bottom 90 percent of Americans have had their incomes rise by a mere 13 percent, compared with an outlandish increase of 399 percent for the top 400, and yet in 2010, the Republicans are bashing the Obama administration for having the temerity to undo the sinful Bush-Cheney tax cuts for the rich.

Keep in mind that these are the same families that have changed the language of the "estate tax" to the "death tax." The ultra-wealthy want the middle and lower classes to falsely believe that there is a tax upon our death, when nothing of the sort is true. What is true is that there is a tax upon large lucrative estates of the wealthy, an attempt to keep the outrageous vast fortunes of this 1% in check, lest they become more powerful than the government. They have manipulated the language to get the middle and lower classes to say no to a tax that is meant only for the wealthy upper class. Not only are they dishonest and greedy, but conniving and immoral come to mind as well.

To quote the fictitious character Dr. Smith, from the 1960's TV show Lost In Space... "Oh the pain Will Robinson, Oh the pain."

The disparity of wealth in the world today is an aberration for a self proclaimed civilized, moral society. The divide that exists has grown ever wider between the rich and the poor. According to a new study, the Credit Suisse Research Institute in Zurich has found that  the number of global adults worth over $50 million each appears to be considerably greater than a decade ago. Even with the financial industry meltdown, Credit Suisse reports, “the past decade has been especially conducive to the establishment and preservation of large fortunes.”

The new Global Wealth Report crunched financial data from over 200 countries worldwide. The following is what they found...

  • There are roughly 4.4 billion adults combining for $194.5 trillion in world wealth.
  • The world’s richest 1 percent hold over 43 percent of the world’s wealth.
  • There are just over 1,000 billionaires worldwide.
  • There are another 80,000 individuals worth over $50 million each.
  • There are still another 24 million adults worth between $1 million and $50 million.

Conversely, on the disproportionate end, over 4.3 billion adults are not so fortunate.

  • Over 2/3rds of global adults have an average wealth of less than $10,000.
  • About 1.1 billion of these adults hold a net worth of less than $1,000.

Fact: No other nation on Earth has as much total wealth as that of the United States.

The U.S. has 41 percent, of the world’s millionaires, despite having only 5.2 percent of the world’s population. That's an astounding figure to think about.

This glaring disparity has also made the United States number one in the world for one other category, total household debt.

What is increasingly clear is that capitalism, in its present form, is a perversion against humanity, no better than the alleged oppressions of communism, or the fabricated false charges that are made against socialism. Our capitalism has sadly turned to fascism, with a fancy new name, "corporatism."

No one wants to admit we're under the trappings of fascism, so they try to wrap it up in a new less-Nazi associated term. Corporatism or fascism, whatever you want to call it, is a system that looks at "we the people" as merely labor and consumption.

Yes Dorothy, there is a huge distinction in class in the U.S. This isn't just class warfare, it's class Armageddon.

The New World Order: The Third Way

Global government is already here: the UN, the World Trade Organization, and the International Court.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair was the first to publicly embrace the new marketing term, "The Third Way," but many political contemporaries also took hold of the new NWO marketing phrase as well, such as then-President Clinton. It was Blair who wrote, "The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century" calling for a one world government.

The World Federalist Association (WFA) goal is also for a one world federal government. In 1994 it published "The Genius of Federation: Why World Federation Is the Answer to Global Problems."

In their treatise they say, "Let the U.N. establish new agencies such as the International Criminal Court... National sovereignty would be gradually eroded until it is no longer an issue. Eventually a world federation can be formally adopted with little resistance."

The WFA merged with the "Campaign for United Nations Reform" in November 2003, forming a new organization called "Citizens for Global Solutions." Their new motto is "Building a World Community Under Law."

Knock it all you want, but the quest for a one world government is underway and has been since your grandfather was little, very near the turn of the 20th century. The quest for one world government may be benign and just for some, but conversely is greatly biased for others who hold a continual thirst for exploiting wealth and power, such as would spring forth from such an unprecedented monolithic union.

The seeds were planted nearly a century ago, but through the years the evidence has come forth supporting the continued existence of an orchestrated endeavor for a one world government.

“We shall have one world government whether or not we like it. The only question is, whether world government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” -James Warburg – Council on Foreign Relations, 1950 before U.S. Senate.

One thing to understand is that a cabal this large of the wealthy and elite has obviously coalesced over the years due to tremendous ideological differences with our system of government. There are those of great wealth who seek nothing other than more wealth, power and/or acclaim for themselves. On the other hand, there are also those of wealth, like perhaps Bill Gates, who feel as though they are in a position to change the world for the better. Like everything in life, there are two sides to the coin. Two factions with the same goal, but not exactly for the same purpose.

Not all of the ultra-wealthy have such beneficent intentions. Some of those wealthy wish for a one world government run by the central banks, with total power and control over all. They have clearly duped the others into following along.

Many times the altruistic subset of rich can get caught up and entangled with the unscrupulous set and can be easily swayed. One area where this appears to have happened is the plan for a new world order, as mentioned by Paul Warburg. Many appear to be in support of the plan, a one world government ruled over by the wealthiest central bankers, however, not all realize the adverse consequences of such a potentially dangerous endeavor.

There are many arguments for why a one-world system is attractive and most are quite easily understandable, however, that ideology exists only in a perfect world, one in which we clearly do not yet exist. Proponents for the NWO would say that is because we have not yet created that order, but a common moral center, without personal financial gain, is needed first before such an idea can be a true altruistic plan for  success, as opposed to a nefarious plan of oppression.

While the intentions may be altruistic in their basic concept, there are many issues to be resolved that must contend with the concept of evil in a one world government. Capitalism, as we embrace it today, would seem to be a clear threat to that beneficent intent, if left unchecked in it’s present form. If the world were to ever evolve to one unified community, then the inherent nature of man must surely evolve also, with more compassion and humility, while losing its avarice.

With such a grandiose plan for international integration being so far along at this point, we can only pray that this coup is uncovered and stopped in time, before it is too late, or that those with the best of intentions from this group will take charge and steer this bold quest with compassion and integrity, rather than greed. So far, it appears our best hope is that a divide is created among the rich over the fulfillment of this long standing plan. A change in direction is needed for this impending revolutionary new world order. 

Here is what mega-billionaire David Rockefeller has said on the new world order:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." --David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991

Consider this statement which also comes from Mr. Rockefeller:

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." --David Rockefeller, UN 1994

As if that isn't enough, don't forget this much scrutinized quote:

“Some even believe we (Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” -David Rockefeller, 2002 Memoirs

What appears to be apparent is that those of the elite uber-wealthy have concocted a plan and are working toward a goal for global dominance. This was admitted as much in 1950 to members of the U.S. Senate by none other than Paul Warburg, a CFR member and one of the principal architects of the Federal Reserve.

People such as Rockefeller and Warburg make these admissions under the guise of a one world system, void of nationalism, one which they claim would be free of warfare. Keep in mind though that the act of war is to deter aggression or to conquer an opposing force. With the world under one rule of the mega-rich, why would war ever be needed again when the people of the world would already be under a single captive rule? Under a totalitarian one world rule, what hope does mankind have for not being bound into slavery according to social class?

(More to come...)


Just as this article began, I will once again remind the reader of the two most important thoughts to remember when assessing high crimes of the ultra-wealthy and power elite:

(1) "Follow the money," because (2) "money is power and power is control."

And remember one last thing. Once power is given, or seized, it is extremely hard to unrest without superior force and even greater power.

The truth is always a formidable foe, but it only registers when there are ears to hear and intellect to reason with. Sometime if the lie is loudest and more repetitive the truth can become obfuscated and lost in the chatter, unless those among the audience are willing to truly listen and distinguish fact from fiction. Agendas perpetuate myth, but the truth reflects reality and will always stand on its own without passion and emotion.

When united, the people have the superior force and the greater power, however, those at the top know and understand this all too well, which is why they do their best to keep their secrets hidden by blinding us with disinformation and deceit, and also keeping us divided in a combative two-party political system, all to safeguard their crimes while keeping the vast majority of the populace in the dark.

To quote the X-Files once again, "the truth is out there."


This article is not yet complete and is an ongoing work. Please check back periodically for further updates.

There are but two powers in the world, the sword and the mind.
In the long run, the sword is always beaten by the mind.

-Napoleon Bonaparte

Films That Every American Should See

America: From Freedom to Fascism  [ Really Must See ]

Murder, Spies And Voting Lies - Pt 1 | Pt2  [ Really Must See ]

American Assault  (Erosion of rights, the Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act)

The Century of Self - Pt1  |  Pt2  |  Pt3  |  Pt4

The Trap - Pt1  |  Pt2  |  Pt3

PsyWar [ Really Must See ]

The Corporation

The Core of Corruption

9/11 Press For Truth  [ Really Must See ]

An American Coup  [ Really Must See ]

Money, Banking and the Federal Reserve

9/11: Loose Change III Final Cut

Zero: An Investigation of 9/11

Capitalism: A Love Story  [ Really Must See ]



Hacking Democracy

OutFOXed: Rupert Murdoch's War On Journalism


People need to understand that the real fight in this country isn't the sideshow going on between our awful two-party system in which we are politically enslaved. The real fight is class warfare between us and the uber-rich...

The Absolute Power of the Federal Reserve

Alan Greenspan: There Is No Authority Above The Federal Reserve

This arrogant admission clearly admits who really runs the show.

The 1934 Coup Against FDR and the U.S.

The Forgotten Coup On America

This was very big news at the time, but was withheld from our history books.

More On The 1934 Coup On America

When the ultra-wealthy own the media, these things can be hidden.


The battle for your mind.


The problem today with society

You've got to get mad if you want justice


The Plan For World Domination

The New World Order

Deny it if you like, but the notion is clearly alive and well.

The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. --President John F. Kennedy 4/27/61

John F. Kennedy On Secret Societies

Eisenhower's Farewell Warning To The Nation

John Davidson Rockefeller and John D Rockefeller Jr


Rockefeller Family Tree

David Rockefeller Jr. 1941 - present
David Rockefeller Sr. 1915 - present
John Davidson Rockefeller III 1906 - 1978
John Davidson Rockefeller Jr. 1874 - 1960
John Davidson Rockefeller Sr. 1839 - 1937
William Avery Rockefeller 1810 - 1906

William Avery Rockefeller was said to be a "snake-oil" salesman, however his family would prosper far beyond him. It was John Davidson Rockefeller Sr. (1839-1937) who was America's first billionaire, but it was his son, John D. Rockefeller Jr. (1874-1960) who defined the family empire. The junior Rockefeller would eventually sire a daughter, Abby, as well as five sons, John D the III, Nelson, Laurance, Winthrop, and David. It is David Rockefeller (1915) who has carried the family legacy forward. He will leave it in the hands of his namesake, David Rockefeller Jr.

  • Force behind the Federal Reserve
  • Created the Trilateral Commission
  • Began business in oil but have migrated to banking.
  • One of the original forces behind the CFR, Council on Foreign Relations.

John Pierpont Morgan and JP Morgan Jr


Morgan Family Tree

Charles F. Morgan  - present
John A. Morgan  - present
Junius Spencer Morgan III 1892 - 1960
Henry S. Morgan 1900 - 1982
John Pierpont Morgan Jr. (Jack) 1867 - 1943
John Pierpont Morgan 1837 - 1913
Junius Spencer Morgan 1813 - 1890
Joseph Morgan 1780 - 1847
Joseph Morgan 1735 - 1813

On April 25, 1949, Life Magazine ran an article entitled, "Morgan The Great," where historian Frederick Lewis Allen reported that "certain chroniclers have arrived at the ingenious conclusion that the Morgan interests took advantage of the unsettled conditions during the autumn of 1907 to precipitate the panic, guiding it shrewdly as it progressed so that it would kill off rival banks and consolidate the preeminence of the banks within the Morgan orbit." [link]

Morgan has been described as "an old hand at creating artificial panics." Allen stated, "Such affairs were well co-coordinated. Senator Robert Owen, a co-author of the Federal Reserve Act, (who later deeply regretted his role), testified before a Congressional Committee that the bank he owned received from the National Bankers' Association what came to be know as the Panic Circular of 1893. It established: 'You will at once retire one-third of your circulation and call in one-half of your loans.'"  [link]

  • Instigated 1907 financial panic
  • Key figure in 1910 Jekyll Island cabal
  • Bought or infiltrated top 25 newspapers to takeover the press
  • The original force behind the CFR, Council on Foreign Relations.

"The Panic of 1907 was artificially triggered to elicit public acceptance of this idea. Snowballing bank runs began after J.P. Morgan spread a rumor about the insolvency of the Trust Company of America." He added, "Tragedy is the mother of new directions. The Panic of 1907 spawned the Federal Reserve." -James Perloff, The Shadows of Power

You are openly encouraged to save this webpage to your computer, or print it out as a reference, just in case it should ever be pulled from the internet.


More articles from the author… 

The Truth About The Federal Reserve


America Duped


America Stolen

American Assault (Including Video)

American Capitalism


American Media Coup


The Great Divide


The Absurdity of The Conspiracy Theory Fallacy


The Nature Of A Conspiracy Theory


The Truth About "Conspiracy Theory"

Socialism Is Not A Dirty Word

Lemmings & Leaders. Which Are You?

The New World Order

The Bilderberg Group

9/11 Truth

9/11 Facts

9/11 Investigation

9/11 Guide

A September Coup

Video To Edit And Incorporate…


Red flags to tip us off:


Republican versus Democrat is not what it's about.
There is a bigger agenda at work here.
Keep us divided so that we don't pay any attention to them.
Seize world control through the monetary system of the Central Banks.
The 1% wealthiest wage class warfare against middle class for a 21st century fascism.

United We Stand or Divided We Fall.
Which are you choosing?

From Freedom To Fascism

Film producer Aaron Russo also had it "right on the money."

Aaron Russo interview by Alex Jones
After rebuffing CFR recruitment by Rockefeller, Russo sadly died from cancer in 2007.

Note: On October 23, 2007, talk show host Alex Jones declared that Aaron privately told him that he'd been threatened and thought his cancer was the result of an attack.

Interview with Film Producer Aaron Russo
Aaron Russo, "Mad As Hell"
Freedom to Fascism

Throughout history, it has been the inaction of those who could have acted; the indifference of those who should have known better; the silence of the voice of justice when it mattered most; that has made it possible for evil to triumph.
-Haile Selassie

SAVING AMERICA: Necessary Steps To Reclaim Our Constitution
"We The people" Need To Insist Upon Restoring The Vision Of Our Forefathers
NewsFocus - 122609
  • Election Reform - Get rid of Political Action Committees (PACs) and corporate donations.
  • Media Reform Break up media monopolies and encourage diversity of news and opinion.
  • Take over the Federal Reserve Return power to print money to U.S. Government.
  • Balance the Courts Don't lean left or right, but strike a fair balance in our courts.
  • Tax Reform Make the rich pay their share accordingly, as we do, with no more loopholes.
  • PATRIOT Act Reform Re-establish the Constitution & Bill of Rights for "We the People."
  • Reign in the Intel Alphabet Agencies (Hold accountable, CIA, NSA, etc.)

If we don't act soon, it may be too late to reclaim the country we once knew.

Those that have all the power are counting on you
to be complacent, unmotivated and ignorant.

Wake up and Step up!

We want our rights back. We want our country back.

There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part; you can't even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all! -Mario Savio Dec 2, 1964

Muse Hits The Nail On The Head
The English rock band Muse apparently understands full well the dire problems that currently exist in the world concerning the greater "powers that be" and their attempt at a one world government and New World Order. The group wrote and recorded a song called "Uprising" for their 2009 Album titled "The Resistance." The single was released on September 9th, 2009 and hit number one on the Billboard Alternative Music charts, staying there for 17 weeks.
The Uprising
by Muse

Paranoia is in bloom,
The PR transmissions will resume
They'll try to push drugs that keep us all dumbed down
And hope that we will never see the truth around
(so come on)

Another promise, another seed
Another packaged lie to keep us trapped in greed
And all the Green belts wrapped around our minds
And endless red tape to keep the truth confined
(so come on)

They will not force us
They will stop degrading us
They will not control us
We will be victorious
(so come on)

Interchanging mind control
Come let the revolution takes its toll
If you could flick the switch and open your third eye
You'd see that we should never be afraid to die
(so come on)

Rise up and take the power back
It's time the fat cats had a heart attack
They know that their time's coming to an end
We have to unify and watch our flag ascend

They will not force us
They will stop degrading us
They will not enslave us
We will be victorious

Muse - "Uprising

Oppression of the people as the powers that be fight for their New World Order

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
Edmund Burke

How The System Works

This is why they talk about population control. Too many people are too hard to control.

On The Rich Oligarchs of This World:

We are not their slaves, nor are we servants to their institutions. We are not beneath the upper class, as they would have us believe. As humans, we are their equal.

They are nothing without us, for it is from us that they have labor and markets, and most importantly their wealth. They have no real wealth without us. We tire of dying in manufactured wars for their prosperity. Their crimes against mankind, instigated for the sake of their own personal wealth, will be exposed and will no longer be tolerated.

They should have quit while they were ahead. They had a good thing going, but they were too greedy. They stepped too far with 9/11 and moved too fast with their plans for the New World Order. There are those among their cabal who are now rightfully scared. Thankfully there are also military leaders who are seeing the light. The people of the world are waking up, and the ultra-wealthy elite know it. "We the people" will rise up and we will take them down. Their families will weep and be forever humiliated by the shame of their patriarch's greed and evil.

The people out number the elite six billion to one! Make no mistake about it, one day the masses will rise up against their tyranny, and their oppressors will bow down to "we the people." These soulless ultra-wealthy parasites of mankind have overstepped the decency of humanity, and for that they will surely pay when they are brought to justice in an inevitable day of reckoning. Whether it is 10 years from now, or even 50 years from now, it will happen. The people will not be oppressed.

While they have taken many from us, such as JFK, RFK and MLK, they only make us stronger and far more determined. To borrow a line from a contemporary American sci-fi movie classic, with slight modification, "You may strike us down, but we will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine."

God didn't let his people be oppressed in Egypt. One thing is clear from the actions of those of unfathomable wealth, they do not worship the same God that we do. Theirs is an occult deception. They are fools to believe anything less. Their time has been marked and it is coming to an end soon. It has been prophesied about, it has been written... it is inevitable.

A Message To The New World Order

"We The People" Say No To Your Plan For World Domination To Enrich Yourselves


During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.

--George Orwell      

Jesse Ventura On Riz Khan

Ventura speaks his mind and speaks with truth for All Americans.

Ed Note: Don't be a lemming. Do not take this author's word for it. Research for yourself and find out the truth. Think on your own. Find alternative press outside the corporate media. Don't be caught up in left versus right. Reason the facts. Big money controls the world and wants to fool you.

For the record: My life has been threatened once already through a calculated attempt to force me into a freeway accident. (Two eyewitnesses were driving directly behind me and saw the encounter as it unfolded.) Those with secrets to hide have developed many 'accidents' to take out those who would rat them out, such as, stroke, heart attack, cancer, airplane crash, house fire, murder from crazed off the street lunatic, and even suicide. To be clear, I would never commit suicide, as they have alleged for heroes such as Hunter S. Thompson, Steve Kangas, and many others. I am a most careful person with eyes wide open.

Thanks for reading.


About The Author:
Tim Watts is a veteran San Francisco broadcaster with 25 years experience in the industry as an on-air talent, Program Director, and consultant. He is the creator and sole author of the websites NewsFocus.org, and TheAmericanTruthNetwork.com. He has been writing about U.S. corruption over the last decade, while also investigating 9/11 from the moment that the first tower fell. He has documented his 9/11 research on a website called A September Coup